Digestive Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Department of Experimental Medicine, Università degli studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Oncologist. 2019 Feb;24(2):185-192. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0072. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
In the phase III CORRECT trial, regorafenib significantly improved survival in treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The CONSIGN study was designed to further characterize regorafenib safety and allow patients access to regorafenib before market authorization.
This prospective, single-arm study enrolled patients in 25 countries at 186 sites. Patients with treatment-refractory mCRC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≤1 received regorafenib 160 mg once daily for the first 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle. The primary endpoint was safety. Progression-free survival (PFS) per investigator assessment was the only efficacy evaluation.
In total, 2,872 patients were assigned to treatment and 2,864 were treated. Median age was 62 years, ECOG PS 0/1 was 47%/53%, and 74% had received at least three prior regimens for metastatic disease. Median treatment duration was three cycles. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) led to dose reduction in 46% of patients. Regorafenib-related TEAEs led to treatment discontinuation in 9%. Grade 5 regorafenib-related TEAEs occurred in <1%. The most common grade ≥3 regorafenib-related TEAEs were hypertension (15%), hand-foot skin reaction (14%), fatigue (13%), diarrhea (5%), and hypophosphatemia (5%). Treatment-emergent grade 3-4 laboratory toxicities included alanine aminotransferase (6%), aspartate aminotransferase (7%), and bilirubin (13%). Ongoing monitoring identified one nonfatal case of regorafenib-related severe drug-induced liver injury per DILI Working Group criteria. Median PFS (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 2.7 months (2.6-2.7).
In CONSIGN, the frequency and severity of TEAEs were consistent with the known safety profile of regorafenib. PFS was similar to reports of phase III trials. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01538680.
Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who fail treatment with standard therapies, including chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies targeting vascular endothelial growth factor or epidermal growth factor receptor, have few treatment options. The multikinase inhibitor regorafenib was shown to improve survival in patients with treatment-refractory mCRC in the phase III CORRECT ( = 760) and CONCUR ( = 204) trials. However, safety data on regorafenib for mCRC in a larger number of patients were not available. The CONSIGN trial, carried out prospectively in more than 2,800 patients across 25 countries, confirmed the safety profile of regorafenib from the phase III trials and reinforced the importance of using treatment modifications to manage adverse events.
在 CORRECT 三期试验中,regorafenib 显著改善了治疗耐药转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者的生存。CONSIGN 研究旨在进一步描述 regorafenib 的安全性,并允许患者在获得市场授权之前使用 regorafenib。
这项前瞻性、单臂研究在 186 个地点的 25 个国家招募了患者。治疗耐药的 mCRC 患者和东部合作肿瘤学组体能状态(ECOG PS)≤1 患者接受regorafenib 160mg,每日一次,每 4 周周期的前 3 周。主要终点是安全性。研究者评估的无进展生存期(PFS)是唯一的疗效评价。
共 2872 例患者被分配接受治疗,2864 例患者接受了治疗。中位年龄为 62 岁,ECOG PS 0/1 为 47%/53%,74%的患者接受过至少三种转移性疾病的治疗方案。中位治疗持续时间为 3 个周期。治疗出现的不良事件(TEAEs)导致 46%的患者减少剂量。regorafenib 相关的 TEAEs 导致 9%的患者停药。<1%的患者发生 5 级 regorafenib 相关 TEAEs。最常见的≥3 级 regorafenib 相关 TEAEs 为高血压(15%)、手足皮肤反应(14%)、疲劳(13%)、腹泻(5%)和低磷血症(5%)。治疗出现的 3-4 级实验室毒性包括丙氨酸氨基转移酶(6%)、天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(7%)和胆红素(13%)。持续监测发现按照 DILI 工作组标准,一例非致命性的与 regorafenib 相关的严重药物性肝损伤病例。中位 PFS(95%置信区间[CI])为 2.7 个月(2.6-2.7)。
在 CONSIGN 中,TEAEs 的频率和严重程度与已知的 regorafenib 安全性特征一致。PFS 与三期试验报告相似。ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT01538680。
标准治疗(包括化疗和针对血管内皮生长因子或表皮生长因子受体的单克隆抗体)耐药的转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者治疗选择有限。多激酶抑制剂regorafenib 已被证明可改善治疗耐药的 mCRC 患者的生存,在 CORRECT 三期(=760)和 CONCUR 二期(=204)试验中。然而,尚无更多患者接受 regorafenib 治疗 mCRC 的安全性数据。CONSIGN 研究在 25 个国家的 2800 多名患者中前瞻性进行,证实了三期试验中 regorafenib 的安全性,并强调了使用治疗修改来管理不良事件的重要性。