Anderson Timothy S, Ayanian John Z, Herzig Shoshana J, Souza Jeffrey, Landon Bruce E
Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs (VA) Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Jul;73(7):2106-2116. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19496. Epub 2025 May 2.
Timely primary care follow-up after hospitalization is recommended to monitor recovery and coordinate care. Whether follow-up differs for vulnerable populations, such as those with frailty and those discharged to skilled nursing facilities (SNF) prior to returning home, is not known.
Retrospective cohort study using a 100% sample of traditional Medicare beneficiaries discharged from hospital to home or from hospital to SNF and then home, between 2010 and 2022. The primary outcome was the receipt of a primary care visit within 30 days of return to home, measured overall and stratified by disposition (discharged home vs. to SNF then home) and by frailty (defined by a claims-based frailty index). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate changes in outcomes over time, overall and stratified by disposition and frailty.
The cohort included 94,248,326 discharges (80.1% age ≥ 65 years, 55.1% female, 36.7% frail) of which 21.5% were discharged to SNF and then home. Between 2010 and 2022, primary care follow-up increased from 51.5% to 57.5% for patients discharged directly home and from 24.3% to 28.4% for patients discharged to SNF then home. In adjusted analyses, compared to those discharged directly home, patients discharged to SNF and then home had an 8.2% point (pp) (95% CI, -8.5 to -7.9) lower predicted probability of ambulatory follow-up in 2022. Among patients discharged directly home, no difference was evident in follow-up between frail and non-frail patients (54.6% vs. 54.1%); difference 0.4 pp (95% CI, -0.1 to 1.0). In contrast, among patients discharged to SNF then home, frail patients had a lower predicted probability of follow-up (42.8% vs. 48.9%); difference - 6.1 pp (95% CI, -7.0 to -5.2).
Frail patients and patients requiring a short-term SNF stay after hospitalization are less likely to receive timely follow-up upon return to home than other patient groups.
建议在住院后及时进行初级保健随访,以监测康复情况并协调护理。对于脆弱人群,如身体虚弱者以及在回家前被送往专业护理机构(SNF)的患者,随访情况是否有所不同尚不清楚。
采用回顾性队列研究,对2010年至2022年间从医院出院回家或从医院转至SNF然后回家的传统医疗保险受益人的100%样本进行研究。主要结局是回家后30天内接受初级保健就诊的情况,总体测量并按出院去向(直接出院回家与先转至SNF再回家)和身体虚弱程度(根据基于索赔的虚弱指数定义)进行分层。使用多变量逻辑回归模型估计总体以及按出院去向和身体虚弱程度分层的结局随时间的变化。
该队列包括94248326次出院(80.1%年龄≥65岁,55.1%为女性,36.7%身体虚弱),其中21.5%先转至SNF再回家。2010年至2022年间,直接出院回家的患者初级保健随访率从51.5%升至57.5%,先转至SNF再回家的患者从24.3%升至28.4%。在调整分析中,与直接出院回家的患者相比,先转至SNF再回家的患者在2022年进行门诊随访的预测概率低8.2个百分点(pp)(95%CI,-8.5至-7.9)。在直接出院回家的患者中,虚弱和非虚弱患者的随访情况无明显差异(54.6%对54.1%);差异为0.4 pp(95%CI,-0.1至1.0)。相比之下,在先转至SNF再回家的患者中,虚弱患者的随访预测概率较低(42.8%对48.9%);差异为-6.1 pp(95%CI,-7.0至-5.2)。
与其他患者群体相比,身体虚弱的患者以及住院后需要短期入住SNF的患者回家后接受及时随访的可能性较小。