• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保险过渡护理管理计划与及时出院后随访的变化。

Medicare Transitional Care Management Program and Changes in Timely Postdischarge Follow-Up.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Division of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Apr 5;5(4):e240417. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0417.

DOI:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0417
PMID:38607641
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11065163/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

In 2013, Medicare implemented payments for transitional care management (TCM) services, which provide increased reimbursement to clinicians providing ambulatory care to patients after discharge from medical facilities to the community.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the introduction of TCM payments was associated with an increase in timely postdischarge follow-up.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional interrupted time-series study assessed quarterly postdischarge visit rates before (2010-2012) and after (2013-2019) TCM implementation 100% sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries discharged to the community after a hospital or skilled nursing facility stay. Data analyses were performed February 1 to December 15, 2023.

EXPOSURE

Implementation of payments for TCM.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Timely postdischarge primary care follow-up, defined as receipt of a primary care ambulatory visit within 14 days of discharge. Secondary outcomes included receipt of a TCM visit and specialty care follow-up.

RESULTS

The study sample comprised 79 125 965 eligible discharges. Of these, 55.4% were female; 1.5% were Asian, 12.1% Black, 5.6% Hispanic, and 79.0% were White individuals; and 79.6% were beneficiaries aged 65 years and older. Timely primary care follow-up increased from 31.5% in 2010 to 38.8% in 2019 (absolute increase 7.3%), whereas specialist follow-up increased from 27.6% to 30.8% (absolute increase 3.2%). By 2019, 11.3% of eligible patients received TCM services. Interrupted time-series analyses demonstrated an increased slope of timely primary care follow-up after the introduction of TCM services (pre-TCM slope, 0.12% per quarter vs post-TCM slope, 0.29% per quarter; difference, 0.13%; 95% CI, 0.02% to 0.22%). Receipt of timely follow-up increased for all demographic groups; however, Black, Hispanic, and Medicaid dual-eligible patients and patients residing in urban areas and counties with high-level social deprivation were less likely to receive follow-up during the study period. These disparities widened for Black patients (difference-in-differences in pre-TCM vs post-TCM slope, -0.14%; 95% CI, -0.25% to -0.2%) and patients who were Medicaid dual-eligible (difference-in-differences pre-TCM vs post-TCM slope, -0.21%; 95% CI, -0.35% to -0.07%).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that Medicare's introduction of payments for TCM services was associated with a persistent increase in the rate of timely postdischarge primary care but did not narrow demographic or socioeconomic disparities. Most beneficiaries did not receive timely primary care follow-up.

摘要

重要性:2013 年,医疗保险开始支付过渡性护理管理(TCM)服务费用,这为向从医疗机构出院到社区的患者提供门诊护理的临床医生增加了报销。

目的:确定 TCM 支付的引入是否与出院后及时随访的增加有关。

设计、设置和参与者:这项横断面中断时间序列研究评估了医疗保险按服务收费受益人的出院后季度随访率,这些患者在出院前(2010-2012 年)和之后(2013-2019 年)接受了 TCM 服务。该研究的样本包括 100%接受过住院或熟练护理机构治疗后出院到社区的医疗保险按服务收费受益人群。数据分析于 2023 年 2 月 1 日至 12 月 15 日进行。

暴露:TCM 服务支付的实施。

主要结果和测量:及时进行出院后的初级保健随访,定义为在出院后 14 天内接受初级保健门诊就诊。次要结果包括接受 TCM 就诊和专科护理随访。

结果:研究样本包括 79125965 名符合条件的出院患者。其中,55.4%为女性;1.5%为亚洲人,12.1%为黑人,5.6%为西班牙裔,79.0%为白人;79.6%为 65 岁及以上的受益人。及时进行初级保健随访的比例从 2010 年的 31.5%增加到 2019 年的 38.8%(绝对增加 7.3%),而专科随访的比例从 27.6%增加到 30.8%(绝对增加 3.2%)。到 2019 年,11.3%的符合条件的患者接受了 TCM 服务。中断时间序列分析显示,在引入 TCM 服务后,及时进行初级保健随访的斜率增加(TCM 服务前斜率为每季度 0.12%,TCM 服务后斜率为每季度 0.29%;差异为 0.13%;95%置信区间为 0.02%至 0.22%)。所有人群的及时随访率都有所增加;然而,黑人、西班牙裔和医疗补助双重合格患者以及居住在城市地区和社会剥夺程度较高的县的患者在研究期间不太可能接受随访。对于黑人患者(TCM 服务前与后斜率的差异,-0.14%;95%置信区间,-0.25%至-0.2%)和医疗补助双重合格患者(TCM 服务前与后斜率的差异,-0.21%;95%置信区间,-0.35%至-0.07%),这些差异有所扩大。

结论:这些发现表明,医疗保险引入 TCM 服务支付与及时出院后初级保健率的持续增加有关,但并未缩小人口统计学或社会经济差距。大多数受益人没有得到及时的初级保健随访。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f225/11065163/b8989db467c5/jamahealthforum-e240417-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f225/11065163/02b7e4c6c88c/jamahealthforum-e240417-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f225/11065163/b8989db467c5/jamahealthforum-e240417-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f225/11065163/02b7e4c6c88c/jamahealthforum-e240417-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f225/11065163/b8989db467c5/jamahealthforum-e240417-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Medicare Transitional Care Management Program and Changes in Timely Postdischarge Follow-Up.医疗保险过渡护理管理计划与及时出院后随访的变化。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Apr 5;5(4):e240417. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0417.
2
Changes in Health Care Costs and Mortality Associated With Transitional Care Management Services After a Discharge Among Medicare Beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人出院后与过渡性护理管理服务相关的医疗保健成本和死亡率变化
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Sep 1;178(9):1165-1171. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.2572.
3
Assessment of Receipt of the First Home Health Care Visit After Hospital Discharge Among Older Adults.评估老年人出院后首次家庭医疗保健访问的情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2015470. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15470.
4
Receipt of Timely Primary Care Services Following Post-Acute Skilled Nursing Facility Care.急性后熟练护理设施护理后及时获得初级保健服务。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Mar;22(3):701-705.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.09.016. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
5
Ambulatory Follow-up and Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries After Emergency Department Discharge.医保受益人的急诊出院后门诊随访和结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2019878. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19878.
6
Assessment of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's Increase in Fees for Primary Care and Access to Care for Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries.评估《患者保护与平价医疗法案》对双重保险受益人的初级保健费用和获得医疗服务的影响。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2033424. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.33424.
7
Follow-up Post-discharge and Readmission Disparities Among Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries, 2018.2018 年 Medicare 按服务收费受益人的出院后随访和再入院差异。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Sep;37(12):3020-3028. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07488-3.
8
Savings and outcomes under Medicare's bundled payments initiative for skilled nursing facilities.医疗保险熟练护理设施捆绑支付计划下的储蓄和结果。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Dec;69(12):3422-3434. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17409. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
9
Trends and Disparities in Ambulatory Follow-Up After Cardiovascular Hospitalizations : A Retrospective Cohort Study.心血管住院后门诊随访的趋势和差异:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2024 Sep;177(9):1190-1198. doi: 10.7326/M23-3475. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
10
Disparities in Postdischarge Ambulatory Care Follow-Up Among Medicaid Beneficiaries With Diabetes, Hospitalized for Heart Failure.糖尿病 Medicaid 受益人心力衰竭住院患者出院后门诊医疗随访的差异。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Jun 20;12(12):e029094. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.029094. Epub 2023 Jun 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Gaps in Primary Care Follow-Up After Hospital Discharge Among Medicare Beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人出院后初级保健随访存在的差距。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Jul;73(7):2106-2116. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19496. Epub 2025 May 2.
2
Medicare transitional care management services' association with readmissions and mortality.医疗保险过渡性护理管理服务与再入院及死亡率的关联。
Health Aff Sch. 2024 Oct 28;2(11):qxae135. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae135. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Association between medication complexity and follow-up care attendance: insights from a retrospective multicenter cohort study across 1,223 Chinese hospitals.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Barriers to Timely Medical Care Among Adults in the US, 1999 to 2018.1999 年至 2018 年美国成年人及时获得医疗服务障碍的种族和民族差异趋势。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Oct 7;3(10):e223856. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.3856.
2
Quality of race and ethnicity data in Medicare.医疗保险中种族和族裔数据的质量。
Healthc (Amst). 2022 Dec;10(4):100662. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2022.100662. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
3
Association of Early Physician Follow-up With Readmission Among Patients Hospitalized for Acute Myocardial Infarction, Congestive Heart Failure, or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
药物治疗复杂性与后续护理就诊率之间的关联:来自一项对1223家中国医院的回顾性多中心队列研究的见解。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jul 29;15:1448986. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1448986. eCollection 2024.
4
Trends and Disparities in Ambulatory Follow-Up After Cardiovascular Hospitalizations : A Retrospective Cohort Study.心血管住院后门诊随访的趋势和差异:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2024 Sep;177(9):1190-1198. doi: 10.7326/M23-3475. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
急性心肌梗死、充血性心力衰竭或慢性阻塞性肺疾病住院患者的早期医生随访与再入院的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2222056. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.22056.
4
Rural-Urban Disparities in Outcomes of Myocardial Infarction, Heart Failure, and Stroke in the United States.美国心肌梗死、心力衰竭和中风结局的城乡差异。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jan 25;79(3):267-279. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.10.045.
5
Trends in Differences in Health Status and Health Care Access and Affordability by Race and Ethnicity in the United States, 1999-2018.1999-2018 年美国种族和民族之间健康状况和医疗保健可及性及可负担性差异的趋势。
JAMA. 2021 Aug 17;326(7):637-648. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.9907.
6
Birds of a feather flock together: Comparing controlled pre-post designs.物以类聚,人以群分:比较对照前后测设计。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct;56(5):942-952. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13697. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
7
Trends in telehealth and in-person transitional care management visits during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间远程医疗和门诊过渡性护理管理就诊的趋势。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Oct;69(10):2745-2751. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17329. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
8
Medicare's Care Management Codes Might Not Support Primary Care As Expected.医疗保险的护理管理代码可能无法如预期那样支持初级护理。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 May;39(5):828-836. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00329.
9
Trends Among Rural and Urban Medicare Beneficiaries in Care Delivery and Outcomes for Acute Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attacks, 2008-2017.2008-2017 年农村和城市医疗保险受益人急性中风和短暂性脑缺血发作的护理提供和结果的趋势。
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Jul 1;77(7):863-871. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.0770.
10
Mortality and Hospitalizations for Dually Enrolled and Nondually Enrolled Medicare Beneficiaries Aged 65 Years or Older, 2004 to 2017.2004 年至 2017 年,65 岁及以上同时参加医疗保险和医疗补助计划(Medicare)和仅参加医疗保险的受益人的死亡率和住院率。
JAMA. 2020 Mar 10;323(10):961-969. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1021.