• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤患者未在最近医院接受治疗与院内死亡率的关联:地理空间和社会经济因素分析

The Association of Not Being Treated at the Nearest Hospital on Trauma In-Hospital Mortality: A Geospatial and Socioeconomic Factors Analysis.

作者信息

Ordoñez-Arenas Laura, Orozco Nicolas, Bolaños John, Sánchez Álvaro Ignacio, Gutiérrez María Isabel, Puyana Juan Carlos, García-Marín Alberto

机构信息

Centro de Investigaciones Clínicas, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.

Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Icesi, Cali, Colombia.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2025 Jun;49(6):1654-1664. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12607. Epub 2025 May 2.

DOI:10.1002/wjs.12607
PMID:40318080
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Trauma mortality is strongly influenced by the distance between the trauma site and the hospital, as longer prehospital times delay definitive care and increase the risk of death. In cities like Cali, Colombia, with high rates of penetrating trauma due to systemic violence, geographic and socioeconomic disparities further hinder access to timely care. This study examines the association of not being treated at the nearest hospital on trauma in-hospital mortality, accounting for geographic and socioeconomic factors.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study included 554 adults with moderate-to-severe trauma treated at three trauma centers in Cali, Colombia, between December 2012 and June 2013. Trauma sites were geocoded to calculate distances to the nearest hospital, with "nonproximal care" (NC) defined as treatment at a facility other than the closest one. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated mortality risk and predictors of NC care, whereas geospatial analyses examined socioeconomic associations using the multidimensional poverty index (MPI).

RESULTS

NC care was identified in 47.8% of patients, who were more likely male, uninsured, or subsidized and sustained gunshot injuries. NC care was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (25.5% vs. 18.0%, p = 0.02). Adjusted analyses identified NC care (OR: 1.815, 95% CI: 1.052-3.173), higher injury severity score, and physiologic impairment as predictors of mortality. Socioeconomic and geographic disparities were evident, with high MPI linked to NC care.

CONCLUSIONS

NC care is significantly associated with increased trauma mortality, compounded by socioeconomic and geographic inequities. Enhancing regionalized trauma systems, transportation networks, and equitable healthcare access is essential to reduce disparities and improve outcomes.

摘要

背景

创伤死亡率受创伤地点与医院之间距离的强烈影响,因为较长的院前时间会延迟确定性治疗并增加死亡风险。在哥伦比亚的卡利等城市,由于系统性暴力导致穿透性创伤发生率较高,地理和社会经济差异进一步阻碍了及时获得治疗的机会。本研究探讨了不在最近的医院接受治疗与创伤住院死亡率之间的关联,并考虑了地理和社会经济因素。

方法

一项前瞻性队列研究纳入了2012年12月至2013年6月期间在哥伦比亚卡利的三个创伤中心接受治疗的554名中重度创伤成人。对创伤地点进行地理编码以计算到最近医院的距离,“非近端治疗”(NC)定义为在距离最近医院以外的机构接受治疗。多变量逻辑回归评估死亡率风险和NC治疗的预测因素,而地理空间分析使用多维贫困指数(MPI)检查社会经济关联。

结果

47.8%的患者接受了NC治疗,这些患者更可能是男性、未参保或享受补贴的人群,并且遭受枪伤。NC治疗与较高的住院死亡率相关(25.5%对18.0%,p = 0.02)。调整分析确定NC治疗(比值比:1.815,95%置信区间:1.052 - 3.173)、较高的损伤严重程度评分和生理损伤是死亡率的预测因素。社会经济和地理差异明显,高MPI与NC治疗相关。

结论

NC治疗与创伤死亡率增加显著相关,社会经济和地理不平等使其更加复杂。加强区域化创伤系统、交通网络和公平的医疗服务可及性对于减少差异和改善治疗结果至关重要。

相似文献

1
The Association of Not Being Treated at the Nearest Hospital on Trauma In-Hospital Mortality: A Geospatial and Socioeconomic Factors Analysis.创伤患者未在最近医院接受治疗与院内死亡率的关联:地理空间和社会经济因素分析
World J Surg. 2025 Jun;49(6):1654-1664. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12607. Epub 2025 May 2.
2
Hospital Volume and Social Determinants of Health Do Not Impact Outcomes in Fenestrated Visceral Segment Endovascular Aortic Repair for Patients Treated at VQI Centers.医院手术量和健康的社会决定因素对在VQI中心接受治疗的患者进行开窗内脏段血管腔内主动脉修复术的预后没有影响。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2025 Aug;59(6):584-593. doi: 10.1177/15385744251330017. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
7
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
8
Is level 1 trauma care necessary for all severely injured older patients? Evaluating undertriage and feasibility of care in major and non-major trauma centres in the Netherlands.所有严重受伤的老年患者都需要一级创伤护理吗?评估荷兰主要和非主要创伤中心的分诊不足及护理可行性。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Jun 16;51(1):230. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02897-5.
9
Bimodal, But Not the Same: Persistent Late Peaks in Trauma Mortality.双峰模式,但不尽相同:创伤死亡率中持续存在的晚期峰值
World J Surg. 2025 Jun;49(6):1643-1653. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12592. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
10
SARS-CoV-2-neutralising monoclonal antibodies for treatment of COVID-19.用于治疗 COVID-19 的 SARS-CoV-2 中和单克隆抗体。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 2;9(9):CD013825. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013825.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Trauma center vs. nearest non-trauma center: direct transport or bypass approach for out-of-hospital traumatic cardiac arrest.创伤中心与最近的非创伤中心:院外创伤性心脏骤停的直接转运或绕行策略
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025 Feb 11;33(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13049-025-01335-0.
2
Prehospital Trauma Care.院前创伤护理
Surg Clin North Am. 2024 Apr;104(2):267-277. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2023.10.005. Epub 2023 Nov 18.
3
Does the implementation of a trauma system affect injury-related morbidity and economic outcomes? A systematic review.
创伤系统的实施是否会影响与损伤相关的发病率和经济结果?系统评价。
Emerg Med J. 2024 Jun 20;41(7):409-414. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2023-213782.
4
Geospatial Analysis of Social Vulnerability, Race, and Firearm Violence in Chicago.芝加哥社会脆弱性、种族和枪支暴力的地理空间分析。
J Surg Res. 2024 Feb;294:66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.08.058. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
5
Brief Comparative Analysis of Trauma Care Specialties in Europe and the United States.欧洲和美国创伤护理专业的简要比较分析。
Mil Med. 2023 Nov 3;188(11-12):305-309. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usad164.
6
Social Determinants of Health in Trauma.创伤中的健康社会决定因素。
Am Surg. 2023 Aug;89(8):3597-3599. doi: 10.1177/00031348231160845. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
7
Performance of the Paediatric Trauma Score on survival prediction of injured children at a major trauma centre: A retrospective Colombian cohort, 2011-2019.儿科创伤评分对一家大型创伤中心受伤儿童生存预测的性能:一项2011 - 2019年哥伦比亚回顾性队列研究
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Jun 29;13:100312. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100312. eCollection 2022 Sep.
8
How trauma patients die in low resource settings: Identifying early targets for trauma quality improvement.在资源匮乏环境下创伤患者的死亡原因:确定创伤质量改进的早期目标。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023 Feb 1;94(2):288-294. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003768. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
9
Role of mHealth applications for emergency medical system activation in reducing mortality in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol.移动医疗应用程序在降低中低收入国家急救医疗系统死亡率中的作用:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 23;12(2):e051792. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051792.
10
Global, regional, and national mortality among young people aged 10-24 years, 1950-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.全球、区域和国家范围内 1950 年至 2019 年 10-24 岁青少年的死亡率:2019 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2021 Oct 30;398(10311):1593-1618. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01546-4. Epub 2021 Oct 28.