Suppr超能文献

创伤系统的实施是否会影响与损伤相关的发病率和经济结果?系统评价。

Does the implementation of a trauma system affect injury-related morbidity and economic outcomes? A systematic review.

机构信息

International Health Systems Group, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

NIHR Global Health Research Group on Acquired Brain and Spine Injury, Division of Academic Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2024 Jun 20;41(7):409-414. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2023-213782.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Trauma accounts for a huge burden of disease worldwide. Trauma systems have been implemented in multiple countries across the globe, aiming to link and optimise multiple aspects of the trauma care pathway, and while they have been shown to reduce overall mortality, much less is known about their cost-effectiveness and impact on morbidity.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review to explore the impact the implementation of a trauma system has on morbidity, quality of life and economic outcomes, in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. All comparator study types published since 2000 were included, both retrospective and prospective in nature, and no limits were placed on language. Data were reported as a narrative review.

RESULTS

Seven articles were identified that met the inclusion criteria, all of which reported a pre-trauma and post-trauma system implementation comparison in high-income settings. The overall study quality was poor, with all studies demonstrating a severe risk of bias. Five studies reported across multiple types of trauma patients, the majority describing a positive impact across a variety of morbidity and health economic outcomes following trauma system implementation. Two studies focused specifically on traumatic brain injury and did not demonstrate any impact on morbidity outcomes.

DISCUSSION

There is currently limited and poor quality evidence that assesses the impact that trauma systems have on morbidity, quality of life and economic outcomes. While trauma systems have a fundamental role to play in high-quality trauma care, morbidity and disability data can have large economic and cultural consequences, even if mortality rates have improved. The sociocultural and political context of the surrounding healthcare infrastructure must be better understood before implementing any trauma system, particularly in resource-poor and fragile settings.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022348529 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

摘要

背景

创伤在全球范围内造成了巨大的疾病负担。全球多个国家都实施了创伤系统,旨在连接和优化创伤护理途径的多个方面,虽然这些系统已被证明可以降低总体死亡率,但对于它们的成本效益和对发病率的影响了解甚少。

方法

我们按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目的指南进行了系统评价,以探讨实施创伤系统对发病率、生活质量和经济结果的影响。纳入了自 2000 年以来发表的所有比较研究类型,包括回顾性和前瞻性研究,并且对语言没有限制。数据以叙述性综述的形式报告。

结果

确定了符合纳入标准的 7 篇文章,这些文章均在高收入环境中报告了创伤前和创伤系统实施后的比较。总体研究质量较差,所有研究均显示存在严重的偏倚风险。五项研究报告了多种类型的创伤患者,大多数描述了创伤系统实施后多种发病率和健康经济结果的积极影响。两项研究专门针对创伤性脑损伤,并未显示发病率结果有任何影响。

讨论

目前评估创伤系统对发病率、生活质量和经济结果影响的证据有限且质量较差。虽然创伤系统在高质量创伤护理中发挥着重要作用,但发病率和残疾数据可能会产生巨大的经济和文化后果,即使死亡率有所改善。在实施任何创伤系统之前,必须更好地了解周围医疗保健基础设施的社会文化和政治背景,特别是在资源匮乏和脆弱的环境中。

前瞻性注册编号

CRD42022348529 证据水平:III 级。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31fd/11228185/765df4057b92/emermed-2023-213782f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验