Postma Julie, Parker Molly, Hurst Sheila, Romo Juliana, Graves Janessa M
College of Nursing, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA.
School of Health Sciences, Gonzaga University, Spokane, WA, USA.
J Agromedicine. 2025 Oct;30(4):789-800. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2025.2498342. Epub 2025 May 3.
The purpose of this study was to 1) explore perceptions of air quality (AQ) monitoring, hazard communication, health impacts of smoke exposure, protective controls and training needs among agricultural supervisors in alignment with the major elements of the wildfire smoke rule, and 2) compare survey responses by the language in which the survey was completed to identify training needs by group.
Bilingual personnel administered a 29-question survey in Spanish and English to agricultural supervisors and crew chiefs at two industry trainings in Washington (WA) State (12/2023, 1/2024). Data were analyzed in SPSS. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data with chi-squared tests for group comparisons by language.
A total of 116 surveys were collected, with 61% completed in Spanish. Almost one-fifth (18%) of respondents reported "hypertension/cardiovascular disease" as a condition that impacts their own health, and 19% reported "asthma/respiratory disease." Of respondents, 80% agreed they have been exposed to wildfire smoke at work, and 77% reported they supervised workers who have been exposed to smoke. A significantly greater proportion of completers in Spanish (90%) reported being concerned with their own health and their workers' health in relation to smoke exposure than those completing in English (64%). Most (81%) respondents agreed they can recognize signs/symptoms when a worker is not feeling well due to smoke exposure, but only 63% reported having had training on managing workers with smoke-related symptoms. N95 masks were identified as the most realistic protective control to implement when wildfire smoke is present. There were significant differences by language group regarding what resources respondents identified as accurate for AQ monitoring at work. Most respondents (79%) had heard of the wildfire smoke rule in Washington.
Wildfire smoke is an occupational health threat for outdoors workers that is expected to increase. Supervisors who work in agricultural workplaces are required by law in Washington, Oregon, and California to monitor AQ, manage workers' symptoms, and implement protective controls at certain AQ thresholds. Study findings identify gaps in these areas and will support ongoing training of a critical subsector of the agricultural workforce.
本研究的目的是:1)根据野火烟雾规则的主要要素,探讨农业监管人员对空气质量(AQ)监测、危害沟通、烟雾暴露对健康的影响、防护措施和培训需求的看法;2)比较以完成调查问卷的语言分类的调查回复,以确定不同群体的培训需求。
双语工作人员在华盛顿州的两次行业培训(2023年12月、2024年1月)中,用西班牙语和英语向农业监管人员和组长发放了一份包含29个问题的调查问卷。数据在SPSS中进行分析。描述性统计用于汇总数据,并使用卡方检验按语言进行组间比较。
共收集到116份调查问卷,其中61%是用西班牙语完成的。近五分之一(18%)的受访者表示“高血压/心血管疾病”是影响自身健康的一种疾病,19%的受访者表示是“哮喘/呼吸道疾病”。在受访者中,80%的人同意他们在工作中接触过野火烟雾,77%的人报告说他们监督过接触过烟雾的工人。与用英语完成调查问卷的人(64%)相比,用西班牙语完成调查问卷的人中,有更大比例(90%)的人表示担心自己和工人与烟雾暴露相关的健康问题。大多数(81%)受访者同意,当工人因烟雾暴露而感觉不适时,他们能够识别出症状,但只有63%的人报告接受过管理有烟雾相关症状工人的培训。N95口罩被认为是野火烟雾出现时最切实可行的防护措施。在受访者认为工作场所AQ监测的准确资源方面,不同语言组存在显著差异。大多数受访者(79%)听说过华盛顿州的野火烟雾规则。
野火烟雾是户外工作者面临的职业健康威胁,且这种威胁预计会增加。在华盛顿州、俄勒冈州和加利福尼亚州,法律要求在农业工作场所工作的监管人员监测空气质量、管理工人症状,并在特定空气质量阈值下实施防护措施。研究结果揭示了这些领域的差距,并将为农业劳动力关键子部门的持续培训提供支持。