Suppr超能文献

南印度社区中最常见可识别气味的鉴定

Identification of the Most Common Odours Recognizable in the South Indian Community.

作者信息

Menon Unnikrishnan, Gopalakrishnan Suja, Rajnarayan Sadhana, Rajesh Nandini Lekha, Korambra Neha Pramodan, Saraswathy L, Lalithambika C V, Hari Harsha

机构信息

Department of ENT, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham University, AIMS Ponekkara P O, Kochi, 682041 Kerala India.

Department of Physiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham University, Kochi, Kerala India.

出版信息

Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 May;77(5):2131-2136. doi: 10.1007/s12070-025-05486-5. Epub 2025 Apr 22.

Abstract

The testing of the olfactory sense has gained importance after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Internationally used kits such as the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) is not appropriate for all populations. From an Indian perspective, there is need for a simple, easily available, kit that can test the sense of smell in local populations; in the present case, the south Indian. With this aim, the objective of this study was to create a set of the most commonly recognized odorants in the accessible population of a cross-section of the community in Kochi, a metropolitan city in Kerala, south India. An initial list was created with the help of responses to a questionnaire disseminated amongst a random cross-section of people domiciled in south India. The result was a set of nearly 600 substances, from which the top 16 were selected, for a pilot. This was done to calculate sample size and assess the feasibility of the study in the community. Both the studies were published in the Kerala Sate ENT journal. 500 persons with no self-reported smell disorders were tested. Coffee, Camphor, Clove, Garlic, and Naphthalene were the top five odorants identified by the subjects. Some of these are peculiar to the place, in terms of familiarity and availability. This study highlights the difference in recognizability of odorants in a specific place. We hope to utilize the results for the creation of an actual olfactory kit for use by the medical community.

摘要

在新冠疫情爆发后,嗅觉测试变得愈发重要。国际上常用的测试工具,如宾夕法尼亚大学嗅觉识别测试(UPSIT)并不适用于所有人群。从印度的角度来看,需要一种简单、易于获取的工具包,能够对当地人群,在本案例中即南印度人群的嗅觉进行测试。出于这一目的,本研究的目标是在印度南部喀拉拉邦首府科钦市的一个社区横断面的可及人群中,找出一组最常被识别的气味物质。通过对一份在南印度随机抽取的人群中分发的问卷的回复,初步列出了一份清单。结果得到了一组近600种物质,从中挑选出前16种进行试点。这样做是为了计算样本量并评估该研究在社区中的可行性。这两项研究都发表在了《喀拉拉邦耳鼻喉科杂志》上。对500名自称没有嗅觉障碍的人进行了测试。咖啡、樟脑、丁香、大蒜和萘是受试者识别出的前五种气味物质。其中一些在熟悉程度和可得性方面是该地区特有的。这项研究突出了特定地点气味物质可识别性的差异。我们希望利用这些结果来制作一个供医学界使用的实际嗅觉测试工具包。

相似文献

1
Identification of the Most Common Odours Recognizable in the South Indian Community.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 May;77(5):2131-2136. doi: 10.1007/s12070-025-05486-5. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
2
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
3
Inhaled mannitol for cystic fibrosis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 9;2(2):CD008649. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008649.pub3.
4
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
6
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
8
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 14;9(9):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub6.
9
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub4.
10
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub7.

本文引用的文献

1
Rapid olfactory decline during aging predicts dementia and GMV loss in AD brain regions.
Alzheimers Dement. 2023 Apr;19(4):1479-1490. doi: 10.1002/alz.12717. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
2
The perception of odor pleasantness is shared across cultures.
Curr Biol. 2022 May 9;32(9):2061-2066.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.02.062. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
3
Cultural Adaptation of Sniffin' Sticks Smell Identification Test: The Malaysian Version.
Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Jul;32(111):213-222. doi: 10.22038/ijorl.2019.34346.2138.
4
Risk Factors for Patient-Reported Olfactory Dysfunction After Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Hypophysectomy.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Jul 1;146(7):621-629. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.0673.
5
How to assess olfactory performance with the Sniffin' Sticks test(®).
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2016 Jun;133(3):203-6. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
6
Development of Taiwan Smell Identification Test: a quick office-based smell screening test for Taiwanese.
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2015 Mar-Apr;29(2):e50-4. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2015.29.4174.
7
Hyposmia: an underestimated and frequent adverse effect of chemotherapy.
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Oct;23(10):3053-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2675-z. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
8
Aging in the olfactory system.
Trends Neurosci. 2014 Feb;37(2):77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2013.11.004. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
10
A new cultural adaptation of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test.
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013 Jan;68(1):65-8. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2013(01)oa10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验