Zhang Peiyu, Shi Jingyu
Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Shanghai Pudong New Area Mental Health Center, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Department of Medical Humanities and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2025 Apr 29;18:1075-1084. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S499710. eCollection 2025.
Little research has focused on identifying the dynamic relationship and core features of cognitive emotion regulation strategies (CERS) that critically contribute to the onset and maintenance of NSSI. This study aims to investigate the CERS network structure in Chinese adolescents with NSSI through network analysis, identifying the core strategies within this network.
A total of 2711 Chinese adolescents (50.5% female, mean age = 12.89 ± 0.73 years) were assessed using the CERQ. Independent -tests were conducted to compare CERS scores between adolescents with and without NSSI. Network analysis was performed to identify core CERS and to explore differences in the networks between the two groups.
A total of 1065 adolescents (39.28%) reported engaging in NSSI at least once within the past six months. Among adolescents with NSSI, catastrophizing (strength = 1.32, betweenness = 1.98, closeness = 0.45) and rumination (strength = 1.18, betweenness = 1.10, closeness = 2.02) emerged as the most central CERS. In contrast, among adolescents without NSSI, catastrophizing (strength = 1.79, betweenness = 1.00, closeness = 0.08), rumination (strength = 0.34, betweenness = 1.00, closeness = 1.02), and positive reappraisal (strength = 0.57, betweenness = 1.50, closeness = 1.50) were identified as central CERS. Significant differences in network structure, global strength, and centrality were observed between the two groups, reflecting distinct patterns of CERS.
NSSI is associated with tightly connected, rigid CERS networks. Targeted interventions should focus on reducing catastrophizing and enhancing positive reappraisal to disrupt these rigid cognitive emotion regulation patterns, ultimately mitigating the risk of NSSI.
很少有研究聚焦于识别对非自杀性自伤(NSSI)的发生和维持有重要影响的认知情绪调节策略(CERS)的动态关系和核心特征。本研究旨在通过网络分析调查有NSSI的中国青少年的CERS网络结构,识别该网络中的核心策略。
使用认知情绪调节问卷(CERQ)对总共2711名中国青少年(50.5%为女性,平均年龄 = 12.89 ± 0.73岁)进行评估。进行独立样本t检验以比较有和没有NSSI的青少年之间的CERS得分。进行网络分析以识别核心CERS,并探索两组之间网络的差异。
共有1065名青少年(39.28%)报告在过去六个月内至少有过一次NSSI。在有NSSI的青少年中,灾难化思维(强度 = 1.32,中介中心性 = 1.98,接近中心性 = 0.45)和沉思(强度 = 1.18,中介中心性 = 1.10,接近中心性 = 2.02)成为最核心的CERS。相比之下,在没有NSSI的青少年中,灾难化思维(强度 = 1.79,中介中心性 = 1.00,接近中心性 = 0.08)、沉思(强度 = 0.34,中介中心性 = 1.00,接近中心性 = 1.02)和积极重新评价(强度 = 0.57,中介中心性 = 1.50,接近中心性 = 1.50)被确定为核心CERS。两组之间在网络结构、全局强度和中心性方面观察到显著差异,反映了CERS的不同模式。
NSSI与紧密相连、僵化的CERS网络相关。有针对性的干预应侧重于减少灾难化思维并增强积极重新评价,以打破这些僵化的认知情绪调节模式,最终降低NSSI的风险。