Suppr超能文献

使用定量参数对CT定义的慢性阻塞性肺疾病亚型进行影像学表型评估。

Imaging Phenotypes Assessment by Using Quantitative Parameters for CT-Defined Subtypes of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

作者信息

Chen Wufei, Zhu Jing, Ni Jixiang, Li Xiang, Li Yu, Yin Wen, Zhu Shan, Xiao Yang, Wang Ying, Huang Hui, Hu Yi

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, People's Republic of China.

Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2025 Apr 28;20:1279-1286. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S505092. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To explore the quantitative imaging phenotype differences for CT-defined subtypes classified by the Fleischner Society in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 228 COPD patients who underwent non-enhanced chest CT screening from 2018 to 2024 were included. All patients were divided into type-A (Absent emphysema that no or mild emphysema, Goddard score ≤8, regardless of bronchial wall thickening), type-E (Emphysema that significant emphysema, Goddard score >8, without bronchial wall thickening), and type-M (Mixed emphysema and bronchial wall thickening that both significant emphysema, Goddard score >8, and bronchial wall thickening ≥ grade 1 in ≥1 lung lobe). Imaging phenotype parameters included lung airspace analysis (LAA) and LAA size analysis (LAASA) in emphysema, airway wall, lung vessels and interstitial lung disease (ILD) extracted by a COPD-specific analysis software were analysis among three groups.

RESULTS

Quantitative assessment of emphysema among three image phenotypes showed significant differences in full emphysema and full emphysema ratio based on LAA among three groups (P < 0.05). The areas of consolidation, ground-glass opacity, and reticular patterns were significantly larger in type-M than the other two types (P < 0.05). Quantitative assessment of small airways disease and small vessel parameters found smaller lumen-volume and larger wall-volume in whole lung level in the emphysema phenotype of type-M (P < 0.05) were found in the small vessel count in distance of 6 mm and 9mm from the pleura were significant differences among three groups (P < 0.05). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the higher proportion of full emphysema ratio and wall-volume, a proportion of smaller lumen-volume, and a more noticeable interstitial lung alterations were associated with type-M.

CONCLUSION

A quantitative CT evaluation can further delineate the imaging phenotypes characteristics thereby in guiding to early diagnosis, severity assessment, and therapeutic recommendations in COPD patients.

摘要

目的

探讨慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中,按 Fleischner 学会分类的 CT 定义亚型的定量成像表型差异。

患者与方法

纳入 2018 年至 2024 年期间接受非增强胸部 CT 筛查的 228 例 COPD 患者。所有患者被分为 A 型(无肺气肿,即无或轻度肺气肿,戈达德评分≤8,无论支气管壁增厚情况)、E 型(肺气肿,即显著肺气肿,戈达德评分>8,无支气管壁增厚)和 M 型(混合性肺气肿和支气管壁增厚,即显著肺气肿,戈达德评分>8,且≥1 个肺叶的支气管壁增厚≥1 级)。成像表型参数包括通过 COPD 特异性分析软件提取的肺气肿、气道壁、肺血管和间质性肺疾病(ILD)中的肺气腔分析(LAA)和 LAA 大小分析(LAASA),并在三组之间进行分析。

结果

三种图像表型之间肺气肿的定量评估显示,基于 LAA 的全小叶型肺气肿和全小叶型肺气肿比例在三组之间存在显著差异(P<0.05)。M 型的实变、磨玻璃影和网状影面积显著大于其他两种类型(P<0.05)。对小气道疾病和小血管参数的定量评估发现,M 型肺气肿表型在全肺水平的管腔容积较小,壁容积较大(P<0.05),在距胸膜 6mm 和 9mm 处的小血管计数在三组之间存在显著差异(P<0.05)。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,全小叶型肺气肿比例和壁容积比例较高、管腔容积比例较小以及间质性肺改变更明显与 M 型相关。

结论

定量 CT 评估可进一步描绘成像表型特征,从而指导 COPD 患者的早期诊断、严重程度评估和治疗建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5ee/12047287/9a49f4b2c9a8/COPD-20-1279-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验