Suppr超能文献

拓宽诊断视野:系列阴性C反应蛋白在预测疑似新生儿败血症血培养阴性中的特异性

Broadening Diagnostic Horizons: Specificity of Serial Negative CRPs in Predicting Blood Culture Negativity in Suspected Neonatal Sepsis.

作者信息

Prakash Gullapudi, Sajan Ritvik, Reshma Gayathri G, Gutjahr Georg, S Varsha V, Narmadha M P, Bendapudi Perraju

机构信息

Department of Neonatology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Ernakulam, IND.

Department of Pharmacy Practice, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Ernakulam, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Apr 3;17(4):e81660. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81660. eCollection 2025 Apr.

Abstract

Background Neonatal sepsis is a root cause, among others, of mortality and morbidity among neonates in low-middle-income countries (LMICs). Blood culture remains the gold standard diagnostic tool in diagnosing sepsis; however, it may take 48 to 72 hours to be reported negative. Hence, there is a demand for a quicker alternative to blood cultures. C-reactive protein (CRP) is a potential candidate useful in ruling out sepsis and can be a potential substitute for blood cultures. This prospective study aims to identify whether serial negative CRPs in a suspected case of sepsis can predict negative blood culture and aid in the safe, early discontinuation of antibiotics. Methods The study included babies for whom antibiotics were started on suspicion of sepsis. Two CRP tests, 24 hours apart, were negative. Blood cultures were evaluated for growth at 48 hours and 5 days. The cost incurred with additional antibiotics after two negative CRPs was estimated. Results Among 100 babies enrolled (n=100), 90 (n=90) were suspected of early-onset and 10 (n=10) were suspected of late-onset sepsis. The median gestational age was 34 weeks (interquartile range (IQR): 31.75-35). The median first and second CRP values are 0.2 (IQR: 0.1-0.31) and 1.2 mg/dl (IQR: 0.4-2.02), respectively. All blood cultures (n = 100) were negative, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.96 to 1. Conclusion Two negative CRPs 24 hours apart are sufficient to rule out sepsis with high confidence and predict a negative blood culture for microbial growth. Thus, antibiotics can be stopped following two negative CRPs.

摘要

背景

新生儿败血症是中低收入国家(LMICs)新生儿死亡和发病的主要原因之一。血培养仍然是诊断败血症的金标准诊断工具;然而,报告血培养结果为阴性可能需要48至72小时。因此,需要一种比血培养更快的替代方法。C反应蛋白(CRP)是一种有助于排除败血症的潜在指标,可能成为血培养的潜在替代方法。这项前瞻性研究旨在确定在疑似败血症病例中,连续两次CRP结果为阴性是否能够预测血培养结果为阴性,并有助于安全、早期停用抗生素。

方法

该研究纳入了因疑似败血症而开始使用抗生素的婴儿。两次CRP检测间隔24小时,结果均为阴性。在48小时和5天时评估血培养是否有细菌生长。估计两次CRP结果为阴性后额外使用抗生素的费用。

结果

在纳入的100名婴儿中(n = 100),90名(n = 90)疑似早发型败血症,10名(n = 10)疑似晚发型败血症。中位胎龄为34周(四分位间距(IQR):31.75 - 35)。第一次和第二次CRP的中位值分别为0.2(IQR:0.1 - 0.31)和1.2mg/dl(IQR:0.4 - 2.02)。所有血培养(n = 100)结果均为阴性,95%置信区间为0.96至1。

结论

间隔24小时的两次CRP结果为阴性足以高度自信地排除败血症,并预测血培养无微生物生长。因此,在两次CRP结果为阴性后可以停用抗生素。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Insight Into Neonatal Sepsis: An Overview.新生儿败血症概述
Cureus. 2023 Sep 19;15(9):e45530. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45530. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
CRP and High-Sensitivity CRP: "What's in a Name?".CRP与高敏CRP:“名称有何含义?”
J Appl Lab Med. 2022 Oct 29;7(6):1255-1258. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfac076.
4
Diagnosis of Neonatal Sepsis: The Role of Inflammatory Markers.新生儿败血症的诊断:炎症标志物的作用
Front Pediatr. 2022 Mar 8;10:840288. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.840288. eCollection 2022.
6
Diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: the past, present and future.新生儿败血症的诊断:过去、现在和未来。
Pediatr Res. 2022 Jan;91(2):337-350. doi: 10.1038/s41390-021-01696-z. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
7
[Utility of C-reactive protein in early neonatal sepsis].[C反应蛋白在新生儿早期败血症中的应用]
Rev Chilena Infectol. 2021 Apr;38(2):169-177. doi: 10.4067/S0716-10182021000200169.
9
C-reactive protein for diagnosing late-onset infection in newborn infants.用于诊断新生儿晚发型感染的C反应蛋白
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 14;1(1):CD012126. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012126.pub2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验