Prakash Gullapudi, Sajan Ritvik, Reshma Gayathri G, Gutjahr Georg, S Varsha V, Narmadha M P, Bendapudi Perraju
Department of Neonatology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Ernakulam, IND.
Department of Pharmacy Practice, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Ernakulam, IND.
Cureus. 2025 Apr 3;17(4):e81660. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81660. eCollection 2025 Apr.
Background Neonatal sepsis is a root cause, among others, of mortality and morbidity among neonates in low-middle-income countries (LMICs). Blood culture remains the gold standard diagnostic tool in diagnosing sepsis; however, it may take 48 to 72 hours to be reported negative. Hence, there is a demand for a quicker alternative to blood cultures. C-reactive protein (CRP) is a potential candidate useful in ruling out sepsis and can be a potential substitute for blood cultures. This prospective study aims to identify whether serial negative CRPs in a suspected case of sepsis can predict negative blood culture and aid in the safe, early discontinuation of antibiotics. Methods The study included babies for whom antibiotics were started on suspicion of sepsis. Two CRP tests, 24 hours apart, were negative. Blood cultures were evaluated for growth at 48 hours and 5 days. The cost incurred with additional antibiotics after two negative CRPs was estimated. Results Among 100 babies enrolled (n=100), 90 (n=90) were suspected of early-onset and 10 (n=10) were suspected of late-onset sepsis. The median gestational age was 34 weeks (interquartile range (IQR): 31.75-35). The median first and second CRP values are 0.2 (IQR: 0.1-0.31) and 1.2 mg/dl (IQR: 0.4-2.02), respectively. All blood cultures (n = 100) were negative, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.96 to 1. Conclusion Two negative CRPs 24 hours apart are sufficient to rule out sepsis with high confidence and predict a negative blood culture for microbial growth. Thus, antibiotics can be stopped following two negative CRPs.
新生儿败血症是中低收入国家(LMICs)新生儿死亡和发病的主要原因之一。血培养仍然是诊断败血症的金标准诊断工具;然而,报告血培养结果为阴性可能需要48至72小时。因此,需要一种比血培养更快的替代方法。C反应蛋白(CRP)是一种有助于排除败血症的潜在指标,可能成为血培养的潜在替代方法。这项前瞻性研究旨在确定在疑似败血症病例中,连续两次CRP结果为阴性是否能够预测血培养结果为阴性,并有助于安全、早期停用抗生素。
该研究纳入了因疑似败血症而开始使用抗生素的婴儿。两次CRP检测间隔24小时,结果均为阴性。在48小时和5天时评估血培养是否有细菌生长。估计两次CRP结果为阴性后额外使用抗生素的费用。
在纳入的100名婴儿中(n = 100),90名(n = 90)疑似早发型败血症,10名(n = 10)疑似晚发型败血症。中位胎龄为34周(四分位间距(IQR):31.75 - 35)。第一次和第二次CRP的中位值分别为0.2(IQR:0.1 - 0.31)和1.2mg/dl(IQR:0.4 - 2.02)。所有血培养(n = 100)结果均为阴性,95%置信区间为0.96至1。
间隔24小时的两次CRP结果为阴性足以高度自信地排除败血症,并预测血培养无微生物生长。因此,在两次CRP结果为阴性后可以停用抗生素。