• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用参数化工作模型的双重稳健方差估计

Double robust variance estimation with parametric working models.

作者信息

Shook-Sa Bonnie E, Zivich Paul N, Lee Chanhwa, Xue Keyi, Ross Rachael K, Edwards Jessie K, Stringer Jeffrey S A, Cole Stephen R

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.

Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.

出版信息

Biometrics. 2025 Apr 2;81(2). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujaf054.

DOI:10.1093/biomtc/ujaf054
PMID:40322849
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12050975/
Abstract

Doubly robust estimators have gained popularity in the field of causal inference due to their ability to provide consistent point estimates when either an outcome or an exposure model is correctly specified. However, for nonrandomized exposures, the influence function based variance estimator frequently used with doubly robust estimators of the average causal effect is only consistent when both working models (ie, outcome and exposure models) are correctly specified. Here, the empirical sandwich variance estimator and the nonparametric bootstrap are demonstrated to be doubly robust variance estimators. That is, they are expected to provide valid estimates of the variance leading to nominal confidence interval coverage when only 1 working model is correctly specified. Simulation studies illustrate the properties of the influence function based, empirical sandwich, and nonparametric bootstrap variance estimators in the setting where parametric working models are assumed. Estimators are applied to data from the Improving Pregnancy Outcomes with Progesterone (IPOP) study to estimate the effect of maternal anemia on birth weight among women with HIV.

摘要

双稳健估计量因其在结果模型或暴露模型正确设定时能够提供一致的点估计,而在因果推断领域受到欢迎。然而,对于非随机暴露,常用于平均因果效应双稳健估计量的基于影响函数的方差估计量仅在两个工作模型(即结果模型和暴露模型)都正确设定时才是一致的。在此,经验三明治方差估计量和非参数自助法被证明是双稳健方差估计量。也就是说,当只有一个工作模型正确设定时,预期它们能提供有效的方差估计,从而得到名义置信区间覆盖率。模拟研究说明了在假设参数化工作模型的情况下,基于影响函数、经验三明治和非参数自助法方差估计量的性质。这些估计量被应用于孕酮改善妊娠结局(IPOP)研究的数据,以估计艾滋病毒感染女性中母亲贫血对出生体重的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b2c/12050975/3f362a277805/ujaf054fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b2c/12050975/4cc7e7989a92/ujaf054fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b2c/12050975/94ec68eb7857/ujaf054fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b2c/12050975/3f362a277805/ujaf054fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b2c/12050975/4cc7e7989a92/ujaf054fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b2c/12050975/94ec68eb7857/ujaf054fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b2c/12050975/3f362a277805/ujaf054fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Double robust variance estimation with parametric working models.使用参数化工作模型的双重稳健方差估计
Biometrics. 2025 Apr 2;81(2). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujaf054.
2
Propensity weighting plus adjustment in proportional hazards model is not doubly robust.倾向评分加权加上比例风险模型中的调整不是双重稳健的。
Biometrics. 2024 Jul 1;80(3). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujae069.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
On variance estimation of target population created by inverse probability weighting.基于逆概率加权法的目标人群方差估计
J Biopharm Stat. 2024 Aug;34(5):661-679. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2023.2244593. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
5
How to quantify between-study heterogeneity in single-arm evidence synthesis?-It depends!如何在单臂证据综合中量化研究间异质性?这要看情况!
Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 5;14(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s13643-025-02831-1.
6
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
7
Machine learning outcome regression improves doubly robust estimation of average causal effects.机器学习结果回归改进了平均因果效应的双重稳健估计。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Sep;29(9):1120-1133. doi: 10.1002/pds.5074. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
8
Doubly robust estimators for generalizing treatment effects on survival outcomes from randomized controlled trials to a target population.用于将随机对照试验中生存结局的治疗效果推广到目标人群的双重稳健估计量。
J Causal Inference. 2022;10(1):415-440. doi: 10.1515/jci-2022-0004. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
9
Progestogens for preventing miscarriage: a network meta-analysis.孕激素预防流产的作用:网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD013792. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013792.pub2.
10
On variance estimation of the inverse probability-of-treatment weighting estimator: A tutorial for different types of propensity score weights.逆处理概率加权估计量的方差估计:不同类型倾向评分权重的教程。
Stat Med. 2024 Jun 15;43(13):2672-2694. doi: 10.1002/sim.10078. Epub 2024 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance of Cross-Validated Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation.交叉验证的靶向最大似然估计的性能
Stat Med. 2025 Jul;44(15-17):e70185. doi: 10.1002/sim.70185.

本文引用的文献

1
EXPOSURE EFFECTS ON COUNT OUTCOMES WITH OBSERVATIONAL DATA, WITH APPLICATION TO INCARCERATED WOMEN.观测数据中暴露对计数结果的影响及其在被监禁女性中的应用
Ann Appl Stat. 2024 Sep;18(3):2147-2165. doi: 10.1214/24-aoas1874. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
2
Inverse probability of treatment weighting with generalized linear outcome models for doubly robust estimation.使用广义线性结局模型进行双重稳健估计的治疗权重逆概率法。
Stat Med. 2024 Feb 10;43(3):534-547. doi: 10.1002/sim.9969. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
3
Covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials with missing covariate and outcome data.
存在协变量和结局数据缺失的随机临床试验中的协变量调整。
Stat Med. 2023 Sep 30;42(22):3919-3935. doi: 10.1002/sim.9840. Epub 2023 Jul 2.
4
Application of targeted maximum likelihood estimation in public health and epidemiological studies: a systematic review.靶向极大似然估计在公共卫生和流行病学研究中的应用:系统评价。
Ann Epidemiol. 2023 Oct;86:34-48.e28. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2023.06.004. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
5
Weekly 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate to prevent preterm birth among women living with HIV: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.每周给予 17α-羟基黄体酮治疗预防 HIV 感染孕妇早产:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet HIV. 2021 Oct;8(10):e605-e613. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(21)00150-8. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
6
Challenges in Obtaining Valid Causal Effect Estimates with Machine Learning Algorithms.使用机器学习算法获取有效因果效应估计值面临的挑战。
Am J Epidemiol. 2023 Sep 1;192(9). doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab201. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
7
The Calculus of M-Estimation in R with geex.使用geex在R中进行M估计的计算
J Stat Softw. 2020 Feb;92(2). doi: 10.18637/jss.v092.i02. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
8
Analysis of covariance in randomized trials: More precision and valid confidence intervals, without model assumptions.随机试验中的协方差分析:更高的精度和有效的置信区间,无需模型假设。
Biometrics. 2019 Dec;75(4):1391-1400. doi: 10.1111/biom.13062. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
9
Double Robust Efficient Estimators of Longitudinal Treatment Effects: Comparative Performance in Simulations and a Case Study.纵向治疗效果的双重稳健有效估计量:模拟中的比较性能及一个案例研究
Int J Biostat. 2019 Feb 26;15(2):/j/ijb.2019.15.issue-2/ijb-2017-0054/ijb-2017-0054.xml. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2017-0054.
10
Targeted maximum likelihood estimation for a binary treatment: A tutorial.针对二项治疗的目标极大似然估计:教程。
Stat Med. 2018 Jul 20;37(16):2530-2546. doi: 10.1002/sim.7628. Epub 2018 Apr 23.