Naru Faran Shoaib, Long Janet C, Churruca Kate, Sarkies Mitchell, Braithwaite Jeffrey
Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Jun;31(4):e70113. doi: 10.1111/jep.70113.
To document the challenges experienced and adaptations made during a simulated hospital disaster, and consider the implications of the observations for hospital disaster preparedness.
Nonparticipant observational assessment.
Nonparticipant observations of an exercise simulating a disaster were undertaken by two researchers. The researchers shadowed triage team members, complementing this with observations of the Hospital-Emergency-Operations-Centre, theaters, wards, and Emergency Department subsections such as Resuscitation, Acute, Minor-Injuries-Clinic, Children's emergency, and Mental health. Field notes were coded line-by-line through an inductive thematic analysis, which synthesized both challenges and observed adaptations to those challenges.
The major challenges observed were deaths due to lack of critical care equipment, management of high number of minor injuries, lack of situational awareness, shortage of orderlies, and difficulties in patient tracking and bed allocations. Observed adaptations included pediatricians' treatment of adult patients with minor injuries, fast-tracking triage through ranking, manual ventilation during transfers, and batching of patients requiring imaging to utilize limited orderlies for transfers.
This observational study distills both challenges that clinicians may face in real disasters, and the improvisations that they can make to manage mass casualties. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PROFESSIONS: Research findings hold promising potential in enhancing clinicians' disaster preparedness by articulating specific interventions on mass-casualty management within limited resources.
Unforeseen challenges arise when clinicians are confronted with disaster casualties. This study addresses that problem by not only preempting such challenges, but by also discussing practical solutions. The findings can enable a positive impact on clinicians' readiness for mass casualty influx.
The 21-item checklist of the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR).
Although this study was not focused on a patient population, our research institute incorporates healthcare consumers' advice in all our work.
记录在模拟医院灾难期间所经历的挑战及做出的调整,并思考这些观察结果对医院灾难准备工作的影响。
非参与性观察评估。
两名研究人员对模拟灾难的演习进行非参与性观察。研究人员跟随分诊团队成员,并辅以对医院应急行动中心、手术室、病房以及急诊科各科室(如复苏室、急症科、轻伤诊所、儿童急诊科和精神科)的观察。通过归纳主题分析对实地记录逐行编码,该分析综合了挑战以及针对这些挑战所观察到的调整措施。
观察到的主要挑战包括因缺乏重症护理设备导致的死亡、大量轻伤患者的管理、态势感知不足、护工短缺以及患者追踪和床位分配困难。观察到的调整措施包括儿科医生治疗轻伤成年患者、通过分级进行快速分诊、转运过程中手动通气,以及将需要成像检查的患者集中安排以利用有限的护工进行转运。
这项观察性研究提炼出了临床医生在实际灾难中可能面临的挑战,以及他们为应对大规模伤亡所采取的临时措施。对临床职业的启示:研究结果通过阐明在资源有限的情况下对大规模伤亡管理的具体干预措施,在增强临床医生的灾难准备方面具有广阔的潜力。
临床医生在面对灾难伤亡时会出现一些不可预见的挑战。本研究不仅预先考虑了此类挑战,还讨论了实际解决方案,从而解决了这一问题。研究结果能够对临床医生应对大规模伤亡涌入的准备工作产生积极影响。
采用定性研究报告标准(SRQR)的21项清单。
尽管本研究并非聚焦于患者群体,但我们的研究机构在所有工作中都纳入了医疗消费者的建议。