• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助微创冠状动脉血运重建:中期结果

Robotic Assisted Minimally Invasive Coronary Revascularisation: Midterm Results.

作者信息

Arslanhan Gökhan, Özcan Zeynep Sıla, Şenay Şahin, Baştopçu Murat, Karaağaç Anıl, Koçyiğit Muharrem, Değirmencioğlu Aleks, Alis Deniz, Alhan Cem

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Anesthesiology, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Med Robot. 2025 Jun;21(3):e70071. doi: 10.1002/rcs.70071.

DOI:10.1002/rcs.70071
PMID:40323097
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12051729/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robotic assistance has many advantages in minimally invasive coronary bypass surgery, such as the harvest of a longer portion of the LIMA in addition to the avoidance of sternotomy, thus offering a less invasive approach for multivessel revascularisation. We present the midterm clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted minimally invasive coronary bypass (RA-CABG) cases at our centre.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty consecutive patients who underwent RA-CABG with preoperative computed tomography angiography guidance were studied. Robotic LIMA harvesting was performed. The main outcome measure of the study was the midterm survival and incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) up to 5 years.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 19.8 months. In the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, 1-year survival was 99.1% and 5-year survival was 97.5%. 1-year freedom from MACE was 97.3% and 5-year freedom from MACE was 95%.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic-assisted minimally invasive coronary bypass surgery has safe midterm outcomes and can be performed with excellent results.

摘要

背景

机器人辅助在微创冠状动脉搭桥手术中具有诸多优势,例如能够获取更长的左乳内动脉,同时避免开胸,从而为多支血管血运重建提供了一种侵入性较小的方法。我们展示了本中心机器人辅助微创冠状动脉搭桥术(RA-CABG)病例的中期临床结果。

方法

对150例在术前计算机断层扫描血管造影引导下接受RA-CABG的连续患者进行研究。进行了机器人辅助的左乳内动脉采集。该研究的主要结局指标是长达5年的中期生存率和主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的发生率。

结果

中位随访时间为19.8个月。在Kaplan-Meier生存分析中,1年生存率为99.1%,5年生存率为97.5%。1年无MACE生存率为97.3%,5年无MACE生存率为95%。

结论

机器人辅助微创冠状动脉搭桥手术具有安全的中期结果,并且可以取得优异的效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06fe/12051729/64a3dbee5501/RCS-21-e70071-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06fe/12051729/18dcb6cbe13e/RCS-21-e70071-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06fe/12051729/c4207bb7016c/RCS-21-e70071-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06fe/12051729/b553dcd0d30e/RCS-21-e70071-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06fe/12051729/0f3d5edbf369/RCS-21-e70071-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06fe/12051729/25b0f5439362/RCS-21-e70071-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06fe/12051729/e126a5868f1d/RCS-21-e70071-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06fe/12051729/64a3dbee5501/RCS-21-e70071-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06fe/12051729/18dcb6cbe13e/RCS-21-e70071-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06fe/12051729/c4207bb7016c/RCS-21-e70071-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06fe/12051729/b553dcd0d30e/RCS-21-e70071-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06fe/12051729/0f3d5edbf369/RCS-21-e70071-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06fe/12051729/25b0f5439362/RCS-21-e70071-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06fe/12051729/e126a5868f1d/RCS-21-e70071-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06fe/12051729/64a3dbee5501/RCS-21-e70071-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Robotic Assisted Minimally Invasive Coronary Revascularisation: Midterm Results.机器人辅助微创冠状动脉血运重建:中期结果
Int J Med Robot. 2025 Jun;21(3):e70071. doi: 10.1002/rcs.70071.
2
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术的有限胸骨切开术与全胸骨切开术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 10;4(4):CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub2.
3
Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review.微创直接冠状动脉旁路移植术:一项系统评价。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2004 Jun;45(3):255-64.
4
Early outcomes and follow-up of robotic-assisted multivessel coronary artery bypass with in situ bilateral internal thoracic artery: Report of 221 patients in a single center.机器人辅助原位双侧胸廓内动脉多支冠状动脉搭桥术的早期结果及随访:单中心221例患者报告
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Jun 16. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.06.008.
5
Coronary artery stents: a rapid systematic review and economic evaluation.冠状动脉支架:一项快速系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(35):iii-iv, 1-242. doi: 10.3310/hta8350.
6
Mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis of individual patient data.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗支架置入治疗冠状动脉疾病的死亡率:一项个体患者数据的合并分析。
Lancet. 2018 Mar 10;391(10124):939-948. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30423-9. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
7
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease.基于运动的冠心病心脏康复。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 6;11(11):CD001800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub4.
8
Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 64-slice or higher computed tomography angiography as an alternative to invasive coronary angiography in the investigation of coronary artery disease.64层及以上计算机断层扫描血管造影术作为冠状动脉疾病检查中侵入性冠状动脉造影替代方法的临床有效性和成本效益的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2008 May;12(17):iii-iv, ix-143. doi: 10.3310/hta12170.
9
A systematic review of the safety and efficacy of distal coronary artery anastomotic devices in MIDCAB and TECAB surgery.微创冠状动脉旁路移植术(MIDCAB)和全内镜冠状动脉搭桥术(TECAB)中冠状动脉远端吻合装置安全性和有效性的系统评价。
Perfusion. 2016 Oct;31(7):537-43. doi: 10.1177/0267659115618004. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
10
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术的有限与全胸骨切开术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Dec 6;12(12):CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Multivessel Coronary Bypass Guided by Computerized Tomography.计算机断层扫描引导下的机器人辅助微创多支冠状动脉旁路移植术。
Innovations (Phila). 2024 Jan-Feb;19(1):30-38. doi: 10.1177/15569845231213038. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
2
Long-term clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgical coronary artery revascularisation.机器人辅助手术冠状动脉血运重建的长期临床结果。
EuroIntervention. 2024 Jan 1;20(1):45-55. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00373.
3
Robotic-assisted versus conventional off-pump coronary surgery in women: A propensity-matched study.
女性机器人辅助与传统非体外循环冠状动脉手术:一项倾向匹配研究。
J Card Surg. 2022 Nov;37(11):3525-3535. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16878. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
4
Long-term results of robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting with composite arterial grafts for multiple coronary anastomoses: 10-year experience.机器人辅助冠状动脉旁路移植术联合复合动脉移植物进行多支冠状动脉吻合术的 10 年结果。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Feb;17(1):63-71. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01391-z. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
5
The learning curve of robotic coronary arterial bypass surgery: A report from the STS database.机器人冠状动脉旁路移植术的学习曲线:来自 STS 数据库的报告。
J Card Surg. 2021 Nov;36(11):4178-4186. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15945. Epub 2021 Aug 29.
6
Safe implementation of robotic-assisted minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass: application of learning curves and cumulative sum analysis.机器人辅助微创直接冠状动脉旁路移植术的安全实施:学习曲线和累积和分析的应用
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Jul;13(7):4260-4270. doi: 10.21037/jtd-21-775.
7
Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass in High-Risk Patients with Multivessel Disease.微创直接冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗多支血管病变高危患者。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Oct;69(7):607-613. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1723845. Epub 2021 May 27.
8
Clinical outcomes of multivessel coronary artery disease patients revascularized by robot-assisted vs conventional standard coronary artery bypass graft surgeries in real-world practice.机器人辅助与传统标准冠状动脉旁路移植术在真实世界实践中治疗多支冠状动脉疾病患者的临床结局。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jan 22;100(3):e23830. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023830.
9
Analysis of sternal healing after median sternotomy in low risk patients at midterm follow-up: retrospective cohort study from two centres.低风险患者正中开胸术后中期随访时胸骨愈合情况分析:来自两个中心的回顾性队列研究
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Nov 11;14(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s13019-019-1000-1.
10
Complete Coronary Revascularization via Left Anterior Thoracotomy.经左前开胸术完成冠状动脉血运重建
Innovations (Phila). 2019 Aug;14(4):330-341. doi: 10.1177/1556984519849126. Epub 2019 May 20.