Suppr超能文献

乳腺癌筛查自我报告的检查指征的准确性。

Accuracy of self-reported exam indications for breast cancer screening.

作者信息

Bowles Erin J Aiello, Gao Hongyuan, Fleckenstein Lynn E, Bravo Perla, Nash Michael G, Comstock Bryan, Neslund-Dudas Chris, Mou Jin, Kessler Larry G

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.

Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.

出版信息

JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2025 Apr 30;9(3). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkaf046.

Abstract

We validated updated National Health Interview Survey questions on mammography indications compared with electronic health records (EHRs). We asked 244 Kaiser Permanente Washington members ages 40-74 years and eligible for breast cancer screening to self-report their most recent mammogram reason by using a series of new hierarchical yes/no questions. We first asked if they had the mammogram because of a health problem, then as a follow-up test, and last for screening. We compared self-reported reasons with 2 EHR datasets: procedure/diagnostic codes and radiologist-defined indications. Self-reported exams for a health problem had 89.2% agreement with codes and 92.2% agreement with radiologist-defined indications. Self-reported exams for follow-up had 87.5% agreement with codes and 89.3% agreement with radiologist-defined indications. Self-reported exams for screening had 91.4% agreement with codes and 95.7% agreement with radiologist-defined indications. Self-reported mammogram indications have good agreement with procedure/diagnostic codes and radiologist-reported indications, when asked using this novel hierarchical approach.

摘要

我们将更新后的美国国家健康访谈调查中关于乳房X光检查适应症的问题与电子健康记录(EHR)进行了验证。我们询问了244名年龄在40 - 74岁之间且符合乳腺癌筛查条件的凯撒永久医疗集团华盛顿分部成员,通过一系列新的分层是/否问题来自我报告其最近一次乳房X光检查的原因。我们首先询问他们进行乳房X光检查是否是因为健康问题,其次作为后续检查,最后是为了筛查。我们将自我报告的原因与两个电子健康记录数据集进行了比较:程序/诊断代码和放射科医生定义的适应症。因健康问题自我报告的检查与代码的一致性为89.2%,与放射科医生定义的适应症的一致性为92.2%。自我报告的后续检查与代码的一致性为87.5%,与放射科医生定义的适应症的一致性为89.3%。自我报告的筛查检查与代码的一致性为91.4%,与放射科医生定义的适应症的一致性为95.7%。当使用这种新颖的分层方法进行询问时,自我报告的乳房X光检查适应症与程序/诊断代码以及放射科医生报告的适应症具有良好的一致性。

相似文献

3
Breast cancer screening in Saudi Arabia: free but almost no takers.沙特阿拉伯的乳腺癌筛查:免费但几乎无人参与。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 16;10(3):e0119051. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119051. eCollection 2015.
9
An Exploration of Changes in the Measurement of Mammography in the National Health Interview Survey.国家健康访谈调查中乳房 X 光摄影测量变化的探索。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 Nov;26(11):1611-1618. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0213. Epub 2017 Sep 8.

本文引用的文献

8
Lack of validity of self-reported mammography data.自我报告的乳房X光检查数据缺乏有效性。
Fam Med Community Health. 2019 Jan 29;7(1):e000096. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2018-000096. eCollection 2019.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验