• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺癌筛查外展效果:乳腺 X 光具体提醒与综合预防服务生日信。

Breast cancer screening outreach effectiveness: Mammogram-specific reminders vs. comprehensive preventive services birthday letters.

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101, USA.

Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth, 1 Rope Ferry Rd, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2017 Sep;102:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.06.028. Epub 2017 Jun 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.06.028
PMID:28655547
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5638650/
Abstract

We compared the effectiveness of two outreach strategies on timely mammography adherence: a mammogram-specific reminder letter (sent just before a woman was due) to a birthday letter (addresses multiple preventive services and not timed around due dates). We evaluated screening mammography adherence following 79,848 mammogram-specific and 151,626 birthday letters mailed between 2002 and 2012 to women aged 40-74years enrolled in Kaiser Permanente Washington. Screening mammogram adherence was specifically tied to due date and was evaluated separately by age group and up-to-date or overdue status at the time of mailing. We used generalized estimating equations to account for correlation between repeated observations, to model the odds of screening mammography adherence by letter type. Among women up-to-date, adherence following birthday letters was 22-76% lower compared to the mammogram-specific reminders, with the greatest decreases in adherence in women aged 70-74. Birthday letters were more effective at activating screening uptake among some subgroups of overdue women aged 50-69 and most overdue women aged 70-74, but universally low adherence rates were observed in overdue women. Increasing number of recommended services for women aged 50-74 who were up-to-date resulted in 12-17% lower mammography adherence, but had no effect in women aged 40-49 or in overdue women. Birthday letters are less effective than mammogram-specific reminder letters at prompting women to undergo timely breast cancer screening, particularly among women up-to-date with screening. Birthday letters may be effective at increasing overall preventive care; however, supplemental outreach may be needed around the due date to increase timely preventive services receipt.

摘要

我们比较了两种外展策略对及时进行乳房 X 光检查的效果:一是专门针对乳房 X 光检查的提醒信(在女性即将进行检查之前发送),二是生日信(涵盖多种预防服务,且不围绕截止日期安排)。我们评估了 2002 年至 2012 年间向参加 Kaiser Permanente Washington 的 40-74 岁女性邮寄的 79848 封专门针对乳房 X 光检查的提醒信和 151626 封生日信后的筛查乳房 X 光检查依从性。筛查乳房 X 光检查的依从性与截止日期直接相关,并根据年龄组和邮寄时的最新或逾期状态分别进行评估。我们使用广义估计方程来考虑重复观察之间的相关性,根据信件类型来建立筛查乳房 X 光检查依从性的比值比模型。在最新的女性中,与专门针对乳房 X 光检查的提醒信相比,生日信后进行筛查乳房 X 光检查的依从性低 22%-76%,70-74 岁的女性依从性降幅最大。生日信在某些年龄在 50-69 岁且逾期的女性亚组和大多数年龄在 70-74 岁且逾期的女性中更能有效激活筛查参与度,但在逾期女性中普遍观察到依从率较低的情况。对于最新的年龄在 50-74 岁的女性,建议增加推荐服务的数量会导致乳房 X 光检查的依从性降低 12%-17%,但对年龄在 40-49 岁的女性或逾期女性没有影响。与专门针对乳房 X 光检查的提醒信相比,生日信在促使女性及时进行乳腺癌筛查方面的效果较差,特别是对于最新的筛查女性。生日信可能在增加整体预防保健方面有效;然而,可能需要在截止日期前后进行额外的外展活动,以增加及时接受预防服务的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4844/5638650/c2931b64f6d6/nihms910330f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4844/5638650/bbc38c1685e0/nihms910330f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4844/5638650/eab23e755dcc/nihms910330f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4844/5638650/c2931b64f6d6/nihms910330f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4844/5638650/bbc38c1685e0/nihms910330f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4844/5638650/eab23e755dcc/nihms910330f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4844/5638650/c2931b64f6d6/nihms910330f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Breast cancer screening outreach effectiveness: Mammogram-specific reminders vs. comprehensive preventive services birthday letters.乳腺癌筛查外展效果:乳腺 X 光具体提醒与综合预防服务生日信。
Prev Med. 2017 Sep;102:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.06.028. Epub 2017 Jun 24.
2
Comparative effectiveness of mailed reminder letters on mammography screening compliance.邮寄提醒信对乳腺 X 光筛查依从性的比较效果。
Prev Med. 2012 Aug;55(2):127-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.05.009. Epub 2012 May 22.
3
Comparative effectiveness of two outreach strategies for cervical cancer screening.两种宫颈癌筛查外展策略的比较效果
Prev Med. 2016 May;86:19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.01.016. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
4
Signed family physician reminder letters to women overdue for screening mammography: A randomized clinical trial.给未按时进行乳腺钼靶筛查的女性的家庭医生签署提醒信:一项随机临床试验。
J Med Screen. 2018 Sep;25(3):149-154. doi: 10.1177/0969141317719921. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
5
Mailed Letter Versus Phone Call to Increase Uptake of Cancer Screening: A Pragmatic, Randomized Trial.邮寄信件与电话通知对提高癌症筛查参与度的效果比较:一项实用随机试验。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 Nov-Dec;31(6):857-868. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.06.170369.
6
Implementation and process evaluation of three interventions to promote screening mammograms delivered for 4 years in a large primary care population.在一大群初级保健人群中实施并进行过程评估的三种促进乳腺钼靶筛查干预措施,为期4年。
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Sep;7(3):547-556. doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0497-x.
7
Women's views on reminder letters for screening mammography: Mixed methods study of women from 23 family health networks.女性对乳腺钼靶筛查提醒信的看法:对来自23个家庭健康网络的女性进行的混合方法研究
Can Fam Physician. 2009 Jun;55(6):622-3.e1-4.
8
A 4-year randomized trial comparing three outreach interventions to promote screening mammograms.一项为期 4 年的随机试验,比较了三种外展干预措施以促进乳房 X 光筛查。
Transl Behav Med. 2019 Mar 1;9(2):328-335. doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby031.
9
Women's Behaviors Toward Mammogram and Pap Test: Opportunities to Increase Cervical Cancer Screening Participation Rates among Older Women.女性对乳房 X 光检查和巴氏涂片检查的行为:提高老年女性宫颈癌筛查参与率的机会。
Womens Health Issues. 2018 Jan-Feb;28(1):42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2017.10.010. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
10
Effect of a multimodal reminder program on repeat mammogram screening.多模式提醒计划对重复乳房X光检查筛查的影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Aug;37(2):94-101. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.03.022.

引用本文的文献

1
Breast Cancer Screening During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States: Results From Real-World Health Records Data.美国 COVID-19 大流行期间的乳腺癌筛查:来自真实世界健康记录数据的结果。
Ann Fam Med. 2024 May-Jun;22(3):208-214. doi: 10.1370/afm.3098.
2
Integrated interventions and supporting activities to increase uptake of multiple cancer screenings: conceptual framework, determinants of implementation success, measurement challenges, and research priorities.增加多种癌症筛查接受度的综合干预措施及支持活动:概念框架、实施成功的决定因素、测量挑战及研究重点
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Oct 5;3(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00353-8.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Latina and Black/African American Women's Perspectives on Cancer Screening and Cancer Screening Reminders.拉丁裔及黑人/非裔美国女性对癌症筛查及癌症筛查提醒的看法。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2016 Nov 18. doi: 10.1007/s40615-016-0304-2.
2
Comparative effectiveness of two outreach strategies for cervical cancer screening.两种宫颈癌筛查外展策略的比较效果
Prev Med. 2016 May;86:19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.01.016. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
3
The Effect of the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations on Mammography Rates.
Closing the Gap: A Comparison of Engagement Interventions to Achieve Equitable Breast Cancer Screening in Rural Illinois.
弥合差距:比较在伊利诺伊州农村实现公平乳腺癌筛查的参与干预措施。
Popul Health Manag. 2022 Apr;25(2):244-253. doi: 10.1089/pop.2021.0382.
4
Does mailing unsolicited HPV self-sampling kits to women overdue for cervical cancer screening impact uptake of other preventive health services in a United States integrated delivery system?向逾期未接受宫颈癌筛查的女性邮寄 HPV 自我采样试剂盒是否会影响美国综合医疗服务体系中其他预防保健服务的利用率?
Prev Med. 2022 Jan;154:106896. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106896. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
5
Behavioral interventions to improve population health outreach for hepatitis C screening: randomized clinical trial.行为干预措施提高丙型肝炎筛查的人群健康服务效果:随机临床试验。
BMJ. 2021 May 18;373:n1022. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1022.
6
Social media and mobile health technology for cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.社交媒体和移动医疗技术在癌症筛查中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 5;10(2):e035411. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035411.
7
Improving the promise of embedded pragmatic trials: Surmountable barriers encountered in an evaluation of home-based HPV self-sampling to increase cervical cancer screening in overdue women.提升嵌入式实用试验的前景:在一项基于家庭的人乳头瘤病毒自我采样评估中遇到的可克服障碍,该评估旨在增加逾期妇女的宫颈癌筛查。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 Jul 19;15:100413. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100413. eCollection 2019 Sep.
2009年美国预防服务工作组乳腺癌筛查建议对乳房X光检查率的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug;51(4):1533-45. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12445. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
4
Opioid abuse in the United States and Department of Health and Human Services actions to address opioid-drug-related overdoses and deaths.美国的阿片类药物滥用情况以及美国卫生与公众服务部为应对与阿片类药物相关的过量用药和死亡所采取的行动。
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2015 Jun;29(2):133-9. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2015.1037530.
5
The HMO Research Network Virtual Data Warehouse: A Public Data Model to Support Collaboration.健康维护组织研究网络虚拟数据仓库:支持协作的公共数据模型。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Mar 24;2(1):1049. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1049. eCollection 2014.
6
Mammography rates 3 years after the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force Guidelines changes.2009 年美国预防服务工作组指南更改后 3 年的乳房 X 线照片检查率。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 20;33(9):1067-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.9848. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
7
Improving breast and colon cancer screening rates: a comparison of letters, automated phone calls, or both.提高乳腺癌和结肠癌筛查率:信件、自动电话或两者联用的比较
J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;28(1):46-54. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.01.140174.
8
Examining connections between screening for breast, cervical and prostate cancer and colorectal cancer screening.研究乳腺癌、宫颈癌和前列腺癌筛查与结直肠癌筛查之间的关联。
Colorectal Cancer. 2014 Jun;3(3):253-263. doi: 10.2217/crc.14.18.
9
Longitudinal predictors of colorectal cancer screening among participants in a randomized controlled trial.一项随机对照试验参与者中结直肠癌筛查的纵向预测因素
Prev Med. 2014 Sep;66:123-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.06.013. Epub 2014 Jun 15.
10
Use of interactive voice response to improve colorectal cancer screening.利用交互式语音应答提高结直肠癌筛查率。
Med Care. 2014 Jun;52(6):496-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000116.