Regan Timothy, Devkota Janardan, McQuoid Julia, Lopez-Paguyo Kekoa, Nguyen Nhung, Meacham Meredith C, Ling Pamela M, Thrul Johannes
Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences.
Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2025 May 5. doi: 10.1037/pha0000775.
Knowledge regarding in-the-moment antecedents of cannabis use is lacking. We examined internal (e.g., mood, cravings) and external (e.g., locations, people) antecedents of cannabis use among young adults regularly using both cannabis and tobacco. Over 30 days, 36 young adults ( = 24.2 years, 33% female, 8% nonbinary, 61% sexual minority, 44% Non-Hispanic White) completed multiple daily Ecological Momentary Assessment surveys, totaling 1,632 prompts. Generalized estimating equations estimated population-averaged relationships between the presence of antecedents and cannabis use outcomes (use vs. nonuse). Overall cannabis use was likelier at neutral ranges of affect (a = 0.95; 95% CI [0.91, 1.00]) and affective arousal (a = 1.52; 95% CI [0.91, 1.00], see Footnote 1), higher cannabis craving (a = 1.52; 95% CI [1.31, 1.76]), and substance intoxication (a = 1.25; 95% CI [1.01, 1.55]). Overall use was likelier at home (a = 1.97; 95% CI [1.16, 3.37]), and less likely in a place where cannabis smoking was forbidden (a = 0.46; 95% CI [0.25, 0.85]) or more people were present (a = 0.91; 95% CI [0.87, 0.96]). Other antecedents of use were seeing cannabis product packaging (a = 1.91; 95% CI [1.07, 3.39]) and experiencing racial/ethnic-based discrimination (a = 2.26; 95% CI [1.39, 3.69]). Future digital interventions for cannabis use will benefit from (a) testing real-time interactions between internal and external antecedents and (b) triggering interventions while users are at home alone, after discrimination experiences, and/or when feeling mild, neutral affect. . (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
目前尚缺乏关于大麻使用即时前因的知识。我们研究了经常同时使用大麻和烟草的年轻人中,大麻使用的内部(如情绪、渴望)和外部(如地点、人物)前因。在30多天的时间里,36名年轻人(平均年龄 = 24.2岁,33%为女性,8%为非二元性别,61%为性少数群体,44%为非西班牙裔白人)完成了多次每日生态瞬时评估调查,总计1632次提示。广义估计方程估计了前因的存在与大麻使用结果(使用与未使用)之间的总体平均关系。在中性情绪范围(α = 0.95;95%置信区间[0.91, 1.00])和情感唤醒状态(α = 1.52;95%置信区间[0.91, 1.00],见脚注1)、更高的大麻渴望程度(α = 1.52;95%置信区间[1.31, 1.76])以及物质中毒状态(α = 1.25;95%置信区间[1.01, 1.55])下,总体大麻使用的可能性更高。总体使用在在家时更有可能(α = 1.97;95%置信区间[1.16, 3.37]),而在禁止吸食大麻的地方(α = 0.46;95%置信区间[0.25, 0.85])或有更多人在场时(α = 0.91;95%置信区间[0.87, 0.96])可能性较小。其他使用的前因包括看到大麻产品包装(α = 1.91;95%置信区间[1.07, 3.39])以及经历基于种族/民族的歧视(α = 2.26;95%置信区间[1.39, 3.69])。未来针对大麻使用的数字干预措施将受益于:(a)测试内部和外部前因之间的实时相互作用;(b)在用户独自在家时、经历歧视后以及/或者感到轻度、中性情绪时触发干预措施。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2025美国心理学会,保留所有权利)