Vogel Erin A, Romm Katelyn F, Berg Carla J
TSET Health Promotion Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Cannabis. 2024 Jun 26;7(2):11-23. doi: 10.26828/cannabis/2024/000217. eCollection 2024.
Sexual minority young adults (SMYAs) experience discrimination and have high cannabis use prevalence. Discrimination may be associated with cannabis use, including hazardous use and co-use with tobacco, depending on emotion regulation and gender.
Fall 2020 survey data assessed discrimination, use frequency of emotion regulation strategies (i.e., cognitive reappraisal, expressive suppression), current cannabis use, hazardous use, and cannabis-tobacco dual use among SMYAs (age 18-34) in 6 United States metropolitan areas (women: n=450, =24.1, SD=4.7, 69.6% bisexual, 18.2% lesbian/gay, 12.2% other; men: n=254, =24.7, SD=4.5, 33.5% bisexual, 54.3% gay, 12.2% other). Multivariable logistic regression examined the moderating roles of cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression on associations of discrimination with cannabis use outcomes, stratified by gender and adjusted for age, race and ethnicity, and employment.
Among SMYA women, 89.5% experienced any discrimination; 53.1% reported current cannabis use, of whom 49.4% and 47.7% reported hazardous use and cannabis-tobacco dual use, respectively. Adjusting for sociodemographics, experiencing greater discrimination was associated with greater odds of hazardous cannabis use (aOR=1.08, 95% CI [1.02, 1.15]) and cannabis-tobacco dual use (aOR=1.04, 95% CI [1.01, 1.08]) among SMYA women with greater use of expressive suppression. Among SMYA men, 83.9% experienced any discrimination; 49.2% reported current cannabis use, of whom 55.2% and 44.0% reported hazardous use and cannabis-tobacco dual use. Discrimination and emotion regulation were unrelated to cannabis use outcomes among men. Given high rates of discrimination experiences among SMYAs, emotion regulation skills training may empower SMYAs, particularly women, to cope with discrimination without using cannabis.
性少数青年成年人(SMYAs)遭受歧视,且大麻使用率很高。歧视可能与大麻使用有关,包括危险使用以及与烟草同时使用,这取决于情绪调节和性别。
2020年秋季的调查数据评估了美国6个大都市地区年龄在18至34岁之间的SMYAs中的歧视情况、情绪调节策略(即认知重评、表达抑制)的使用频率、当前大麻使用情况、危险使用情况以及大麻与烟草同时使用的情况(女性:n = 450,平均年龄 = 24.1,标准差 = 4.7,双性恋占69.6%,女同性恋/男同性恋占18.2%,其他占12.2%;男性:n = 254,平均年龄 = 24.7,标准差 = 4.5,双性恋占33.5%,男同性恋占54.3%,其他占12.2%)。多变量逻辑回归分析研究了认知重评和表达抑制对歧视与大麻使用结果之间关联的调节作用,按性别分层,并对年龄、种族和族裔以及就业情况进行了调整。
在SMYA女性中,89.5%经历过任何形式的歧视;53.1%报告当前使用大麻,其中49.4%和47.7%分别报告有危险使用和大麻与烟草同时使用的情况。在对社会人口统计学因素进行调整后,经历更多歧视与在更多使用表达抑制的SMYA女性中危险大麻使用(调整后的比值比[aOR]=1.08,95%置信区间[CI][1.02, 1.15])和大麻与烟草同时使用(aOR = 1.04,95% CI[1.01, 1.08])的更高几率相关。在SMYA男性中,83.9%经历过任何形式的歧视;49.2%报告当前使用大麻,其中55.2%和44.0%分别报告有危险使用和大麻与烟草同时使用的情况。歧视和情绪调节与男性的大麻使用结果无关。鉴于SMYAs中歧视经历的高发生率,情绪调节技能培训可能使SMYAs,特别是女性,有能力在不使用大麻的情况下应对歧视。