• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠癌筛查健康信念模型量表土耳其语版本的效度与信度

Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the health belief model scale for colorectal cancer screening.

作者信息

Koçoğlu Ferdane, Teleş Mesut, Kocaöz Semra

机构信息

Zübeyde Hanım Faculty of Health Sciences, Nursing Department, Department of Public Health Nursing, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University, Derbent Campus, Niğde, 51200, Türkiye.

Zübeyde Hanım Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Health Management, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University, Niğde, Türkiye.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2025 May 22;25(1):1887. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23127-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-025-23127-y
PMID:40405162
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer ranks second among the most prevalent and deadly cancer types for both sexes. Despite having a high mortality rate, colorectal cancer is simultaneously identifiable and preventable through early diagnosis. This study was intended to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Health Belief Model Scale for Colorectal Cancer Screening.

METHODS

This methodological study evaluated the 45-item five-point Likert-type Health Belief Model Scale for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Data collection forms were administered via convenience sampling to 649 participants selected from individuals seeking health services at primary healthcare institutions. The scale's reliability and validity were evaluated via item analyses, content and construct validities, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, the Spearman-Brown formula, and test-retest reliability coefficients. The data set was randomly divided into two subsamples. EFA, reliability analyses (Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, Spearman-Brown Coefficient) and item-total statistics were conducted in sample 1 (n = 324). CFA was conducted in sample 2 (n = 325). Item and scale means and, discriminant validity were calculated and tested using the total sample (N = 649).

RESULTS

According to the resulting four-dimensional structure, the factor loads of the subscale items were 0.48-0.89, and subscales explained 49% of the total variance. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the subscales were 0.804-0.923. The confirmatory factor analysis revealed good fit indices (χ/df = 2.05; RMSEA = 0.06; CFI = 0.95; IFI = 0.95; GFI = 0.80; RMR = 0.08; NFI = 0.91). The subscale means ranged from 2.23 ± 0.72 to 3.60 ± 0.70 while the item means ranged from 1.95 ± 0.81 to 3.80 ± 0.91.

CONCLUSION

The Turkish version of the Health Belief Model Scale for Colorectal Cancer Screening is a valid and reliable measuring tool for Turkish people. Except for barrier scale items, those with low means suggest opportunities for improvement. This scale can be applied in Turkey when measuring individuals' health belief perceptions regarding colorectal cancer screening.

摘要

背景

结直肠癌在男女最常见和致命的癌症类型中排名第二。尽管死亡率很高,但结直肠癌可通过早期诊断同时被识别和预防。本研究旨在评估土耳其语版结直肠癌筛查健康信念模型量表的有效性和可靠性。

方法

本方法学研究评估了包含45个条目的五点李克特式结直肠癌筛查健康信念模型量表。数据收集表通过便利抽样的方式发放给从初级医疗机构寻求医疗服务的个体中选取的649名参与者。通过项目分析、内容效度和结构效度、探索性和验证性因素分析、克朗巴哈系数、麦克唐纳欧米伽系数、斯皮尔曼 - 布朗公式以及重测信度系数来评估该量表的信度和效度。数据集被随机分为两个子样本。在样本1(n = 324)中进行探索性因素分析、信度分析(克朗巴哈系数、麦克唐纳欧米伽系数、斯皮尔曼 - 布朗系数)和项目 - 总分统计。在样本2(n = 325)中进行验证性因素分析。使用总样本(N = 649)计算并检验项目和量表均值以及区分效度。

结果

根据得出的四维结构,子量表条目的因子载荷为0.48 - 0.89,子量表解释了总方差的49%。子量表的克朗巴哈系数为0.804 - 0.923。验证性因素分析显示拟合指数良好(χ/df = 2.05;RMSEA = 0.06;CFI = 0.95;IFI = 0.95;GFI = 0.80;RMR = 0.08;NFI = 0.91)。子量表均值范围为2.23 ± 0.72至3.60 ± 0.70,而项目均值范围为1.95 ± 0.81至3.80 ± 0.91。

结论

土耳其语版结直肠癌筛查健康信念模型量表是一种针对土耳其人群的有效且可靠的测量工具。除了障碍量表项目外,均值较低的项目表明有改进的机会。该量表可在土耳其用于测量个体对结直肠癌筛查的健康信念认知。

相似文献

1
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the health belief model scale for colorectal cancer screening.结直肠癌筛查健康信念模型量表土耳其语版本的效度与信度
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 22;25(1):1887. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23127-y.
2
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Implementation Leadership Scale in the context of nurses.护士情境下实施领导力量表土耳其语版的有效性和信度。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 5;24(1):1347. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11721-6.
3
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the General Work Stress Scale.《一般工作压力量表》土耳其语版本的有效性和可靠性。
J Nurs Manag. 2021 May;29(4):710-720. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13211. Epub 2020 Nov 29.
4
Adaptation of the Problem Areas in Diabetes-Teen Scale into Turkish and examination of its psychometric properties: a validity and reliability study.将青少年糖尿病问题领域量表改编为土耳其语并检验其心理测量学特性:一项有效性和信度研究。
Turk J Pediatr. 2024 Nov 16;66(5):588-598. doi: 10.24953/turkjpediatr.2024.4535.
5
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the readiness for hospital discharge scale/short form.土耳其语版准备出院量表/简表的有效性和可靠性。
J Nurs Manag. 2018 Apr;26(3):295-301. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12547. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
6
Adaptation of the disease-related apathy scale in adults with epilepsy into Turkish: A methodological study.将成人癫痫患者疾病相关冷漠量表改编为土耳其语:一项方法学研究。
Epilepsia Open. 2025 Feb;10(1):210-221. doi: 10.1002/epi4.13094. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
7
Public Stigma of Stroke Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study.中风公众污名量表:土耳其语版的效度与信度研究
Int J Nurs Pract. 2025 Feb;31(1):e70003. doi: 10.1111/ijn.70003.
8
Development of a gestational diabetes risk assessment scale: a validity and reliability study.妊娠期糖尿病风险评估量表的研制:一项效度和信度研究。
Turk J Med Sci. 2023 Oct 12;53(6):1852-1862. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5755. eCollection 2023.
9
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia Knowledge Scale (BPSD-T): A Psychometric Evaluation Among Caregivers.痴呆行为和心理症状知识量表土耳其语版(BPSD-T)的效度和信度:护理人员的心理测量学评估
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2024;35(4):295-305. doi: 10.5080/u27614.
10
The psychometric properties and validity of the Turkish version of the Body Image in Pregnancy Scale (BIPS-Turkish).《孕期身体意象量表(BIPS-土耳其语版)》土耳其语版的心理测量学特性和有效性。
Women Health. 2022 Jan;62(1):21-36. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2021.2008584. Epub 2021 Dec 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Translation, cultural adaptation, and psychometric testing of the Supportive care needs survey for partners and caregivers for Swedish family members of persons diagnosed with colorectal cancer.支持性护理需求调查(用于伴侣和照护者)在瑞典结直肠癌患者家庭成员中的翻译、文化调适和心理测量学测试。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Oct 11;7(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00636-1.
2
Factors influencing organised faecal occult blood test screening participation in culturally and linguistically diverse populations: a scoping review.影响文化和语言多样化人群参与有组织粪便潜血试验筛查的因素:范围综述。
Public Health. 2023 Jun;219:67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.03.022. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
3
Cancer Screening Test Use-U.S., 2019.
癌症筛查测试的使用情况-美国,2019 年。
Am J Prev Med. 2022 Sep;63(3):431-439. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.02.018. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
4
Colorectal cancer screening behaviors.结直肠癌筛查行为
PeerJ. 2021 Mar 8;9:e10951. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10951. eCollection 2021.
5
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
6
Validity and Reliability of the Instruments to Measure Colorectal Cancer Screening Benefits and Barriers-Turkish Version.测量结直肠癌筛查益处与障碍的工具的有效性和可靠性——土耳其语版本
Cancer Nurs. 2022;45(2):E364-E373. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000921.
7
Factors affecting patient adherence to publicly funded colorectal cancer screening programmes: a systematic review.影响患者遵医嘱参与公共资金资助的结直肠癌筛查项目的因素:系统评价。
Public Health. 2021 Jan;190:67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.10.025. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
8
The health belief model and colorectal cancer screening in the general population: A systematic review.健康信念模型与普通人群的结直肠癌筛查:一项系统综述。
Prev Med Rep. 2020 Oct 6;20:101223. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101223. eCollection 2020 Dec.
9
Aspects of colorectal cancer screening, methods, age and gender.结直肠癌筛查的相关方面、方法、年龄和性别。
J Intern Med. 2021 Apr;289(4):493-507. doi: 10.1111/joim.13171. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
10
A Qualitative Analysis of Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening among Korean Americans.韩裔美国人结直肠癌筛查障碍的定性分析。
J Cancer Educ. 2021 Apr;36(2):261-270. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-01621-3.