Berhane Haben, Maroun Anthony, Dushfunian David, Baraboo Justin, Martinez Gabriela, Jacobson Tyler, Bagci Ulas, Allen Bradley D, Markl Michael
Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 737 N Michigan Ave, Ste 1600, Chicago, IL 60611.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, McCormick School of Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Ill.
Radiology. 2025 May;315(2):e240714. doi: 10.1148/radiol.240714.
Background Four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI provides assessment of thoracic aorta hemodynamic measures that are increasingly recognized as important biomarkers for risk assessment. However, long acquisition times and cumbersome data analysis limit widespread availability. Purpose To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of a generative artificial intelligence (AI) approach (fluid physics-informed cycle generative adversarial network [FPI-CycleGAN]) in quantifying aorta hemodynamics directly from anatomic input as an alternative to 4D flow MRI. Materials and Methods Patients were retrospectively identified from a dataset of clinical cardiothoracic MRI examinations performed between November 2011 and July 2020. All patients underwent aortic 4D flow MRI, which served as a reference standard for training and testing of FPI-CycleGANs. A three-dimensional (3D) segmentation of the aortic geometry was used as the only input to predict systolic aortic hemodynamics, with separate networks for bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) (994 in the training set and 248 in the test set) and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) (419 in the training set and 104 in the test set). Voxel-by-voxel and regional analyses were used to quantify and compare (AI vs the reference standard, 4D flow) systolic velocity vector fields, peak velocity, wall shear stress (WSS), and classification of aortic valve stenosis. Results In total, 1765 patients (median age, 53 years [IQR, 41-63 years]; 1242 patients had BAV and 523 had TAV) were included. Mean AI computation time was 0.15 second ± 0.11 (SD), and total training was 1500 and 3600 minutes for the TAV and BAV networks, respectively. The FPI-CycleGAN predicted systolic 3D velocity vector fields accurately, with low bias (<0.01 m/sec) and excellent limits of agreements (±0.06-0.08 m/sec). For peak velocities and WSS, there was strong agreement between FPI-CycleGAN and 4D flow ( = 0.930-0.957 [ < .001], with relative differences of 6.2%-9.8%). AI accurately classified aortic valve stenosis severity in 85.8% of patients (302 of 352) (κ = 0.80 [95% CI: 0.71, 0.89]). The FPI-CycleGAN was robust to one- and two-voxel dilation and erosion (bias, -0.05 to 0.1 m/sec) and ±5° rotation (bias, -0.02 to 0.03 m/sec) of the input data. The application of the trained FPI-CycleGAN in an external test set with contrast-enhanced MR angiography ( = 60 patients) as AI input data demonstrated strong to excellent performance for peak velocities and WSS ( = 0.944-0.965 [ < .001], with relative differences of 6.2%-9.2%). Conclusion Aorta 3D hemodynamics can be derived from anatomic input in less than 1 second using an FPI-CycleGAN and demonstrate strong agreement with in vivo 4D flow MRI systolic hemodynamics. © RSNA, 2025
背景 四维(4D)血流磁共振成像(MRI)可评估胸主动脉血流动力学指标,这些指标越来越被认为是风险评估的重要生物标志物。然而,较长的采集时间和繁琐的数据分析限制了其广泛应用。目的 评估生成式人工智能(AI)方法(流体物理信息循环生成对抗网络 [FPI-CycleGAN])直接从解剖学输入量化主动脉血流动力学的可行性和准确性,作为4D血流MRI的替代方法。材料与方法 从2011年11月至2020年7月进行的临床心胸MRI检查数据集中回顾性识别患者。所有患者均接受主动脉4D血流MRI检查,作为FPI-CycleGAN训练和测试的参考标准。主动脉几何结构的三维(3D)分割用作预测收缩期主动脉血流动力学的唯一输入,针对二叶式主动脉瓣(BAV)(训练集994例,测试集248例)和三叶式主动脉瓣(TAV)(训练集419例,测试集104例)分别构建网络。采用逐体素和区域分析来量化和比较(AI与参考标准4D血流)收缩期速度矢量场、峰值速度、壁面切应力(WSS)以及主动脉瓣狭窄的分类。结果 共纳入1765例患者(中位年龄53岁 [四分位间距,41 - 63岁];1242例患者为BAV,523例患者为TAV)。AI平均计算时间为0.15秒±0.11(标准差),TAV和BAV网络的总训练时间分别为1500分钟和3600分钟。FPI-CycleGAN准确预测了收缩期3D速度矢量场,偏差低(<0.01米/秒)且一致性界限出色(±0.06 - 0.08米/秒)。对于峰值速度和WSS,FPI-CycleGAN与4D血流之间具有高度一致性( = 0.930 - 0.957 [ <.001],相对差异为6.2% - 9.8%)。AI在85.8%的患者(352例中的302例)中准确分类了主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度(κ = 0.80 [95%置信区间:0.71, 0.89])。FPI-CycleGAN对输入数据的单像素和双像素扩张及侵蚀(偏差,-0.05至0.1米/秒)以及±5°旋转(偏差,-0.02至0.03米/秒)具有鲁棒性。将训练好的FPI-CycleGAN应用于以对比增强磁共振血管造影( = 60例患者)作为AI输入数据的外部测试集,结果显示在峰值速度和WSS方面表现为强至优( = 0.944 - 0.965 [ <.001],相对差异为6.2% - 9.2%)。结论 使用FPI-CycleGAN可在不到1秒的时间内从解剖学输入得出主动脉3D血流动力学,并且与体内4D血流MRI收缩期血流动力学表现出高度一致性。© RSNA,2025