Suppr超能文献

“你的整个生活都被颠覆了”:一项反思性主题分析,确定了针对癌症护理者进行定性研究的设计与实施的建议。

"Your whole life is turned upside down": a reflexive thematic analysis identifying recommendations for designing and conducting qualitative research with cancer caregivers.

作者信息

Collins Katelyn E, Crawford-Williams Fiona, Sibthorpe Chris, Goodwin Belinda C, Johnston Elizabeth A

机构信息

School of Psychology and Wellbeing, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Springfield, Queensland, Australia.

Viertel Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2025 May 6;33(6):453. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09493-8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

There is an increasing need to improve access to person-centered support for cancer caregivers. Qualitative research methods can gather rich insights into the lived experiences of cancer caregivers, providing important information about their unique needs, preferences, and experiences in accessing support for themselves.

METHODS

This secondary analysis of a qualitative interview study with cancer caregivers aimed to understand how the design and conduct of interviews can be optimized to center caregivers' voices and lived experiences. Data from 20 semi-structured interviews with cancer caregivers were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis to explore underlying patterns in how the interviews were conducted and how caregivers shared their needs and experiences.

RESULTS

Three themes were developed: (1) cancer caregivers' health and wellbeing was inherently linked to the survivor's health and wellbeing, (2) question wording and design can perpetuate the "patient focus" that cancer caregivers experience in other settings, and (3) participating in qualitative research can be a meaningful experience for caregivers and provide an avenue to connect them with community-based support.

CONCLUSIONS

Researchers should include interview questions which explore dyadic interactions between caregivers and survivors, as well as caregivers' individual experiences. Practicing reflexivity can increase researchers' awareness of implicit biases that inform the design and conduct of their research, such as questions that inadvertently shift the focus to the patient rather than the caregiver. Finally, with deeply personal information often disclosed during qualitative interviews, researchers should be equipped to respond with empathy and connect caregivers to professional support as needed.

摘要

目的

改善癌症护理者获得以患者为中心的支持的机会的需求日益增加。定性研究方法可以深入了解癌症护理者的生活经历,提供有关他们独特需求、偏好以及他们为自己寻求支持的经历的重要信息。

方法

这项对癌症护理者进行的定性访谈研究的二次分析旨在了解如何优化访谈的设计和实施,以使护理者的声音和生活经历成为核心。对来自20名癌症护理者的半结构化访谈数据进行反思性主题分析,以探索访谈实施方式以及护理者如何分享他们的需求和经历中的潜在模式。

结果

形成了三个主题:(1)癌症护理者的健康和幸福与幸存者的健康和幸福有着内在联系;(2)问题的措辞和设计可能会延续癌症护理者在其他环境中所经历的“以患者为中心”的情况;(3)参与定性研究对护理者来说可能是一次有意义的经历,并为他们与基于社区的支持建立联系提供了一条途径。

结论

研究人员应纳入探索护理者与幸存者之间二元互动以及护理者个人经历的访谈问题。进行反思可以提高研究人员对影响其研究设计和实施的隐性偏见的认识,例如那些无意中将焦点转移到患者而非护理者身上的问题。最后,由于在定性访谈中常常会披露非常个人化的信息,研究人员应具备以同理心做出回应的能力,并根据需要将护理者与专业支持联系起来。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c0/12055614/af1daf4ab34c/520_2025_9493_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验