Suppr超能文献

从多方声音中,我们提出一个问题:基于人群的定性癌症研究的社区共同设计。

From many voices, one question: Community co-design of a population-based qualitative cancer research study.

机构信息

Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Aug 26;19(8):e0309361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309361. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study formed the development stage of a population-based survey aiming to: (i) understand the needs and experiences of people affected by cancer in Queensland, Australia and (ii) recruit a pool of participants for ongoing cancer survivorship research. The current study aimed to co-design and test a single qualitative survey question and study invitation materials to maximise acceptability of, and participation in, the survey and future research.

METHODS

Fifty-two community members, including cancer survivors and caregivers, participated across 15 co-design workshops and 20 pretest interviews. During workshops, participants generated and refined ideas for an open-ended survey question and provided feedback on a study invitation letter. The use of a single, open-ended question aims to minimise participant burden while collecting rich information about needs and experiences. The research team then shortlisted the question ideas and revised study invitation materials based on workshop feedback. Next, using interviews, community members were asked to respond to a shortlisted question to test its interpretability and relevance and to review revised invitation materials. Content analysis of participant feedback was used to identify principles for designing study materials.

RESULTS

Principles for designing qualitative survey questions were identified from participant feedback, including define the question timeframe and scope; provide reassurance that responses are valid and valued; and use simple wording. Principles for designing study invitation materials were also identified, including communicate empathy and sensitivity; facilitate reciprocal benefit; and include a 'human element'. The qualitative survey question and study invitation materials created using these principles were considered relevant and acceptable for use in a population-based survey.

CONCLUSIONS

Through community consultation and co-design, this study identified principles for designing qualitative data collection and invitation materials for use in cancer survivorship research. These principles can be applied by other researchers to develop study materials that are sensitive to the needs and preferences of community members.

摘要

目的

本研究构成了一项基于人群的调查的发展阶段,旨在:(i)了解澳大利亚昆士兰州受癌症影响人群的需求和体验;(ii)为正在进行的癌症生存者研究招募参与者。本研究旨在共同设计和测试一个单一的定性调查问题和研究邀请材料,以最大限度地提高调查和未来研究的可接受性和参与度。

方法

52 名社区成员,包括癌症幸存者和护理人员,参加了 15 次共同设计研讨会和 20 次预测试访谈。在研讨会上,参与者提出并完善了一个开放式调查问题的想法,并对研究邀请信提供了反馈。使用单一的开放式问题旨在在收集有关需求和体验的丰富信息的同时,尽量减少参与者的负担。研究团队根据研讨会的反馈意见,筛选出问题想法并修改研究邀请材料。接下来,通过访谈,要求社区成员对一个被提名的问题做出回应,以测试其可理解性和相关性,并审查修订后的邀请材料。对参与者反馈的内容分析用于确定设计研究材料的原则。

结果

从参与者的反馈中确定了设计定性调查问题的原则,包括:定义问题的时间范围和范围;提供回应有效的保证和重视;使用简单的措辞。还确定了设计研究邀请材料的原则,包括:传达同理心和敏感性;促进互惠互利;并包括“人性化元素”。使用这些原则创建的定性调查问题和研究邀请材料被认为在基于人群的调查中是相关和可接受的。

结论

通过社区咨询和共同设计,本研究确定了用于癌症生存者研究的定性数据收集和邀请材料的设计原则。这些原则可被其他研究人员应用于开发对社区成员的需求和偏好敏感的研究材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4099/11346942/4e0da0914f0e/pone.0309361.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验