• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comment on: "A review and meta-analysis: comparing the efficacy of robot-assisted and open radical cystectomy in elderly bladder cancer patients".

作者信息

Hu Zong-Jian, Yang Li

机构信息

Department of Urology, The Second Hospital and Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730030, China.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2025 May 6;19(1):199. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02376-4.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-025-02376-4
PMID:40327216
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Comment on: "A review and meta-analysis: comparing the efficacy of robot-assisted and open radical cystectomy in elderly bladder cancer patients".评论：“一项综述与荟萃分析：比较机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术在老年膀胱癌患者中的疗效”
J Robot Surg. 2025 May 6;19(1):199. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02376-4.
2
A review and meta-analysis: comparing the efficacy of robot-assisted and open radical cystectomy in elderly bladder cancer patients.一项综述与荟萃分析：比较机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术在老年膀胱癌患者中的疗效
J Robot Surg. 2025 Apr 22;19(1):168. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02323-3.
3
Comparison of perioperative complications and health-related quality of life between robot-assisted and open radical cystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助与开放性根治性膀胱切除术围手术期并发症和健康相关生活质量的比较：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Urol. 2019 Aug;26(8):760-774. doi: 10.1111/iju.14005. Epub 2019 May 13.
4
Comparison of Extracorporeal and Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion after Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后体外和体内尿流改道的比较：一项荟萃分析。
Am J Mens Health. 2024 Sep-Oct;18(5):15579883241274866. doi: 10.1177/15579883241274866.
5
Cost comparison between open radical cystectomy, laparoscopic radical cystectomy, and robot-assisted radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer: a systematic review of segmental costs.膀胱癌患者行开放性根治性膀胱切除术、腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术和机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的成本比较：分段成本的系统评价。
BMC Urol. 2019 Nov 8;19(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0533-x.
6
Robotic Assisted Radical Cystectomy vs Open Radical Cystectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术的比较：系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Urol. 2019 Apr;201(4):715-720. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.10.006.
7
Inpatient Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted versus Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: A National Inpatient Sample Database Study.机器人辅助与腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌的住院患者结局：一项全国住院患者样本数据库研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 29;13(3):772. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030772.
8
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy vs open radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌患者的比较：系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Aug 5;21(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03132-4.
9
Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.开放性根治性膀胱切除术与机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术的比较：一项随机临床试验。
Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1042-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.043. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
10
Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy Versus Open Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Perioperative, Oncological, and Quality of Life Outcomes Using Randomized Controlled Trials.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术的比较：使用随机对照试验的围手术期、肿瘤学和生活质量结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol. 2023 Oct;84(4):393-405. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.004. Epub 2023 May 9.

本文引用的文献

1
A review and meta-analysis: comparing the efficacy of robot-assisted and open radical cystectomy in elderly bladder cancer patients.一项综述与荟萃分析：比较机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术在老年膀胱癌患者中的疗效
J Robot Surg. 2025 Apr 22;19(1):168. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02323-3.
2
Age above 70 years and Charlson Comorbidity Index higher than 3 are associated with reduced survival probabilities after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Data from a contemporary series of 334 consecutive patients.年龄大于 70 岁和 Charlson 合并症指数大于 3 与膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术后生存概率降低相关。来自 334 例连续患者的当代系列数据。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2021 Mar 18;93(1):15-20. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2021.1.15.
3
Perioperative outcomes and safety of robotic vs open cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 12,640 cases.
机器人与开放膀胱切除术的围手术期结局和安全性：12640 例病例的系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Urol. 2021 Jun;39(6):1733-1746. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03385-8. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
4
Predictors of Recurrence, and Progression-Free and Overall Survival following Open versus Robotic Radical Cystectomy: Analysis from the RAZOR Trial with a 3-Year Followup.开放与机器人根治性膀胱切除术术后复发、无进展和总生存的预测因素：RAZOR 试验的 3 年随访分析。
J Urol. 2020 Mar;203(3):522-529. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000565. Epub 2019 Sep 24.