• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国城乡差异对艾滋病病毒预防信息传播的启示。

Differences Between Rural and Urban America that Inform HIV Prevention Messaging.

作者信息

Williams Pamela A, Uhrig Jennifer D, Zulkiewicz Brittany A, Johnson Mihaela, Anderson Stefanie K E, August Euna M

机构信息

RTI International, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, PO Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709 - 2194, USA.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

AIDS Behav. 2025 May 6. doi: 10.1007/s10461-025-04710-1.

DOI:10.1007/s10461-025-04710-1
PMID:40327269
Abstract

HIV prevention efforts have traditionally focused on urban areas, yet about one-fourth of new HIV diagnoses in the U.S. are in non-urban areas. This study explored rural and urban differences in perceived HIV risk; perceived HIV stigma; and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) awareness, attitudes, beliefs, communication behaviors, and use to inform the development of communication messages to promote informed decision-making among available HIV prevention options, including PrEP. We conducted interviews, preceded by a brief survey, with 255 adults in 5 rural and 6 urban locations throughout the U.S. with high HIV burden. Participants from rural areas more frequently described their risk of getting HIV as low compared with those from urban areas, although partly due to differences in gender/sexual identity and sexual risk. Participants from rural areas more frequently reported perceived stigma around getting tested for HIV, taking PrEP to prevent HIV, or having HIV and less frequently reported having heard of PrEP and having a healthcare provider talk with them about PrEP compared with those from urban areas. No participants from rural areas reported using PrEP, although 48% of those with HIV-negative or unknown status were at substantial risk based on reported risk factors. Our findings highlight notable differences in perceived HIV risk; perceived HIV stigma; and PrEP awareness, attitudes, beliefs, communication behaviors, and use between individuals residing in rural and urban areas, suggesting that HIV prevention messaging needs to be tailored for rural audiences to support receptivity.

摘要

传统上,艾滋病病毒(HIV)预防工作主要集中在城市地区,但在美国,约四分之一的新增HIV诊断病例发生在非城市地区。本研究探讨了农村和城市地区在感知到的HIV风险、感知到的HIV污名化以及暴露前预防(PrEP)知晓率、态度、信念、沟通行为和使用情况方面的差异,以为制定沟通信息提供参考,从而促进在包括PrEP在内的现有HIV预防选项中做出明智决策。我们在美国5个农村和6个城市的高HIV负担地区,对255名成年人进行了访谈,访谈前先进行了简短调查。与城市地区的参与者相比,农村地区的参与者更频繁地将自己感染HIV的风险描述为低,不过部分原因是性别/性身份和性风险方面的差异。与城市地区的参与者相比,农村地区的参与者更频繁地报告在接受HIV检测、服用PrEP预防HIV或感染HIV方面存在感知到的污名化,并且更少报告听说过PrEP以及有医疗服务提供者与他们谈论过PrEP。农村地区没有参与者报告使用过PrEP,尽管根据报告的风险因素,48%的HIV阴性或状况不明者处于高风险状态。我们的研究结果突出了农村和城市地区居民在感知到的HIV风险、感知到的HIV污名化以及PrEP知晓率、态度、信念、沟通行为和使用情况方面的显著差异,这表明HIV预防信息需要针对农村受众进行量身定制,以提高接受度。

相似文献

1
Differences Between Rural and Urban America that Inform HIV Prevention Messaging.美国城乡差异对艾滋病病毒预防信息传播的启示。
AIDS Behav. 2025 May 6. doi: 10.1007/s10461-025-04710-1.
2
Inequities in HIV prevention among trans and/or non-binary people: a cross-sectional survey analysis of PrEP and PEP awareness and use in Spain.跨性别者和/或非二元性别者在艾滋病预防方面的不平等:西班牙暴露前预防(PrEP)和暴露后预防(PEP)知晓率及使用情况的横断面调查分析
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jul 7;24(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02574-4.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Weekly Text Messages to Support Adherence to Oral Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Cisgender Men Who Have Sex With Men (MSM) and Transgender Women: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Nested in PrEP Brasil Study.通过每周发送短信支持男同性恋者、双性恋者以及其他与男性发生性关系的顺性别男性(MSM)和跨性别女性坚持口服暴露前预防药物(PrEP):嵌套于巴西PrEP研究中的试点随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 18;27:e72360. doi: 10.2196/72360.
5
Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Mobile HIV Prevention App to Increase HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing and Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Initiation Among Rural Men Who Have Sex With Men in the Southern United States: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.评估一款移动艾滋病预防应用程序在美国南部农村男男性行为者中提高艾滋病病毒和性传播感染检测率以及启动暴露前预防的效果:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jul 23;14:e69540. doi: 10.2196/69540.
6
Multilevel Intervention to Support Tailored and Responsive HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Care in Rural North Carolina: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.北卡罗来纳州农村地区支持定制化和响应式HIV暴露前预防护理的多层次干预:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Mar 21;14:e68085. doi: 10.2196/68085.
7
Rural and urban differences in HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) awareness and acceptability among Black cisgender women living in the U.S. South.美国南部黑人顺性别女性中,城乡地区对艾滋病病毒暴露前预防(PrEP)的认知与接受程度差异
AIDS Care. 2025 Apr 14:1-9. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2025.2487218.
8
Preexposure Prophylaxis to Prevent HIV Acquisition: Perceptions among Sexual and Gender Minority Individuals in North Carolina.暴露前预防以防止感染艾滋病毒:北卡罗来纳州性少数群体和性别少数群体的认知情况
South Med J. 2025 Jul;118(7):357-364. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001852.
9
Interest in and Willingness to Use PrEP: A Cross-Sectional Study of Individuals with Problematic Substance Use Residing in a High HIV Prevalence Jurisdiction.对 PrEP 的兴趣和使用意愿:居住在 HIV 高流行地区的有问题物质使用个体的横断面研究。
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Oct;53(9):3687-3698. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-02936-z. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
10
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训

本文引用的文献

1
Facilitators and Barriers of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Uptake Among Rural Men who have Sex with Men Living in the Midwestern U.S.促进和阻碍美国中西部农村地区男男性行为者使用暴露前预防(PrEP)的因素
Arch Sex Behav. 2020 Aug;49(6):2179-2191. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01654-6. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
2
Reported preexposure prophylaxis use among male sex partners of HIV-positive men: 2016-2018.报告称,2016-2018 年间,HIV 阳性男性的男性性伴侣中有使用暴露前预防措施。
AIDS. 2020 Jun 1;34(7):1081-1087. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002517.
3
Temporal Trends and Sociodemographic Correlates of PrEP Uptake in Tennessee, 2017.
田纳西州 2017 年普及型预防治疗(PrEP)的采用率的时间趋势和社会人口学相关性。
AIDS Behav. 2019 Oct;23(Suppl 3):304-312. doi: 10.1007/s10461-019-02657-8.
4
Correlates Associated With Willingness to Start Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Among Young Black Men Who Have Sex With Men (MSM) in Jackson, Mississippi.密西西比州杰克逊市与愿意开始使用暴露前预防措施的年轻男男性行为者(MSM)相关的因素。
Fam Community Health. 2019 Jul/Sep;42(3):189-196. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0000000000000225.
5
Prevalence and Correlates of PrEP Awareness and Use Among Black Men Who Have Sex with Men and Women (MSMW) in the United States.美国男男性行为者和女性(MSMW)中,关于 PrEP 知晓率和使用率的流行状况及相关因素。
AIDS Behav. 2019 Oct;23(10):2694-2705. doi: 10.1007/s10461-019-02446-3.
6
Knowledge, interest, and anticipated barriers of pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake and adherence among gay, bisexual, and men who have sex with men who are incarcerated.在押男同性恋、双性恋和与男性发生性关系的男性对暴露前预防措施的了解、兴趣和预期障碍及其坚持情况。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 7;13(12):e0205593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205593. eCollection 2018.
7
HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis and Women: Survey of the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs in an Urban Obstetrics/Gynecology Clinic.HIV 暴露前预防与女性:对一家城市妇产科诊所的知识、态度和信念的调查。
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2018 Dec;32(12):490-494. doi: 10.1089/apc.2018.0030. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
8
HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Stigma as a Multidimensional Barrier to Uptake Among Women Who Attend Planned Parenthood.HIV 暴露前预防污名是阻碍参加计划生育的妇女接受预防的一个多维度障碍。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018 Sep 1;79(1):46-53. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001762.
9
Facilitators and Barriers to Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Willingness Among Young Men Who Have Sex with Men Who Use Geosocial Networking Applications in California.加利福尼亚州使用地理社交网络应用程序的男男性行为者中暴露前预防意愿的促进因素和障碍
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2017 Dec;31(12):517-527. doi: 10.1089/apc.2017.0082.
10
Barriers to Access and Adoption of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for the Prevention of HIV Among Men Who Have Sex With Men (MSM) in a Relatively Rural State.在一个相对农村地区的州,男男性行为者(MSM)在获取和采用暴露前预防措施以预防艾滋病毒方面存在的障碍。
AIDS Educ Prev. 2017 Aug;29(4):315-329. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2017.29.4.315.