Matthews Alexander Handel, Evans Jonathan Peter, Evans Jonathan Thomas, Lamb Sarah, Price Andrew James, Gray William, Briggs Tim, Toms Andrew D
Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
Getting It Right First Time Programme, NHS England, London, UK.
BMJ Open. 2025 May 6;15(5):e085201. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085201.
Patients undergoing revision total knee replacement (RevKR) surgery often have difficulties mobilising and increasingly rely on family support. Evolving practice in England aims to manage these patients in specialised centres with the intention of improving outcomes. This practice will result in longer travel distances and times in this frailer group of patients. We want to examine the types of distances and travel times patients can be expected to travel for this complex orthopaedic surgery and to explore concerns of how these impact patient outcomes.
Retrospective observational study from the Hospital Episode Statistics. Multivariable adjusted logistic regression models were used to investigate the relationship between patient travel distances and times with perioperative outcomes.
Patients presenting to tertiary referral centres between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2019. A tertiary referral centre was defined as a trust performing >49 revisions in the year prior.
Adult patients undergoing RevKR procedures for any reason between 1 January 2016 ando 31 December 2019.
The shortest patient level travel distance and time was calculated using the Department of Health Journey Time Statistics using Transport Accessibility and Connectivity Calculator software and Dijkstra's algorithm.
The primary outcome is emergency readmission within 30 days. Secondary outcomes are mortality within 90 days and length of inpatient stay.
6880 patients underwent RevKR at 36 tertiary referral centres. There was a weak correlation between social deprivation and travel distance, with patients from the most deprived areas travelling longer distances. Overall, 30-day readmission was not statistically associated with longer driving distance (OR 1.00 95% CI 0.99 to 1.02) or peak driving times (OR 1.00 95% CI 0.99 to 1.01).
There was no association between increasing travel distance and time on perioperative outcomes for RevKR patients.
接受全膝关节置换翻修术(RevKR)的患者在活动时常常存在困难,且越来越依赖家庭支持。英国不断发展的医疗实践旨在将这些患者集中在专门的中心进行管理,以期改善治疗效果。这种做法将导致这类较为虚弱的患者群体的出行距离和时间增加。我们希望研究患者因这项复杂的骨科手术预计出行的距离和时间类型,并探讨这些因素对患者治疗效果的影响。
基于医院病历统计数据的回顾性观察研究。采用多变量调整逻辑回归模型来研究患者出行距离和时间与围手术期治疗效果之间的关系。
2016年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间前往三级转诊中心就诊的患者。三级转诊中心定义为前一年进行超过49例翻修手术的医疗机构。
2016年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间因任何原因接受RevKR手术的成年患者。
使用卫生部行程时间统计数据,通过交通可达性和连通性计算器软件以及迪杰斯特拉算法计算患者最短的出行距离和时间。
主要结局指标为30天内急诊再入院。次要结局指标为90天内死亡率和住院时间。
36家三级转诊中心的6880例患者接受了RevKR手术。社会剥夺与出行距离之间存在微弱关联,来自最贫困地区的患者出行距离更长。总体而言,30天再入院率与更长的驾车距离(比值比1.00,95%置信区间0.99至1.02)或驾车高峰时间(比值比1.00,95%置信区间0.99至1.01)无统计学关联。
RevKR患者出行距离和时间的增加与围手术期治疗效果之间无关联。