• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

目标值和流行率影响年轻和老年的视觉觅食。

Target value and prevalence influence visual foraging in younger and older age.

机构信息

Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Department of Neuropsychology and Rehabilitation Psychology, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Visual Attention Lab, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Visual Attention Lab, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Departments of Ophthalmology & Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Vision Res. 2021 Sep;186:87-102. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2021.05.001. Epub 2021 May 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2021.05.001
PMID:34062375
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8978103/
Abstract

The prevalence and reward-value of targets have an influence on visual search. The strength of the effect of an item's reward-value on attentional selection varies substantially between individuals and is potentially sensitive to aging. We investigated individual and age differences in a hybrid foraging task, in which the prevalence and value of multiple target types was varied. Using optimal foraging theory measures, foraging was more efficient overall in younger than older observers. However, the influence of prevalence and value on target selections was similar across age groups, suggesting that the underlying cognitive mechanisms are preserved in older age. When prevalence was varied but target value was balanced, younger and older observers preferably selected the most frequent target type and were biased to select another instance of the previously selected target type. When value was varied, younger and older observers showed a tendency to select high-value targets, but preferences were more diverse between individuals. When value and prevalence were inversely related, some observers showed particularly strong preferences for high-valued target types, while others showed a preference for high-prevalent, albeit low-value, target types. In younger adults, individual differences in the selection choices correlated with a personality index, suggesting that avoiding selections of low-value targets may be related to reward-seeking behaviour.

摘要

目标的出现频率和奖励价值对视觉搜索有影响。个体之间对物品奖励价值的注意力选择的影响强度差异很大,并且可能对衰老敏感。我们在混合觅食任务中调查了个体和年龄差异,其中多个目标类型的出现频率和价值都有所不同。使用最佳觅食理论措施,在年轻观察者中,觅食的总体效率高于老年观察者。然而,在年龄组之间,出现频率和价值对目标选择的影响相似,这表明在老年中保留了潜在的认知机制。当出现频率变化但目标价值平衡时,年轻和老年观察者更喜欢选择最常见的目标类型,并偏向于选择先前选择的目标类型的另一个实例。当价值变化时,年轻和老年观察者倾向于选择高价值的目标,但个体之间的偏好更为多样化。当价值和出现频率成反比时,一些观察者对高价值目标类型表现出特别强烈的偏好,而另一些观察者则偏好高出现频率但价值较低的目标类型。在年轻成年人中,选择选择的个体差异与人格指数相关,这表明避免选择低价值的目标可能与寻求奖励的行为有关。

相似文献

1
Target value and prevalence influence visual foraging in younger and older age.目标值和流行率影响年轻和老年的视觉觅食。
Vision Res. 2021 Sep;186:87-102. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2021.05.001. Epub 2021 May 29.
2
Hybrid foraging search in younger and older age.老年和年轻个体中的混合觅食搜索。
Psychol Aging. 2019 Sep;34(6):805-820. doi: 10.1037/pag0000387. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
3
Hybrid value foraging: How the value of targets shapes human foraging behavior.混合价值觅食:目标价值如何塑造人类觅食行为。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Apr;80(3):609-621. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1471-x.
4
The selection balance: Contrasting value, proximity and priming in a multitarget foraging task.选择平衡:多目标觅食任务中的对比价值、接近度和启动效应。
Cognition. 2022 Jan;218:104935. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104935. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
5
Hybrid foraging search: Searching for multiple instances of multiple types of target.混合觅食搜索:搜索多种类型目标的多个实例。
Vision Res. 2016 Feb;119:50-9. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.12.006. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
6
Foraging tempo: Human run patterns in multiple-target search are constrained by the rate of successive responses.觅食节奏:在多目标搜索中,人类的奔跑模式受到连续反应率的限制。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Feb;75(2):297-312. doi: 10.1177/1747021820961640. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
7
Physical Salience and Value-Driven Salience Operate through Different Neural Mechanisms to Enhance Attentional Selection.物理凸显和价值驱动凸显通过不同的神经机制增强注意选择。
J Neurosci. 2020 Jul 8;40(28):5455-5464. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1198-19.2020. Epub 2020 May 29.
8
Frontal, Striatal, and Medial Temporal Sensitivity to Value Distinguishes Risk-Taking from Risk-Aversive Older Adults during Decision Making.额叶、纹状体和内侧颞叶对价值的敏感性在决策过程中区分了冒险型与规避风险型老年人。
J Neurosci. 2016 Dec 7;36(49):12498-12509. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1386-16.2016.
9
How humans react to changing rewards during visual foraging.人类在视觉觅食过程中如何对不断变化的奖励做出反应。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Nov;79(8):2299-2309. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1411-9.
10
Visual foraging and executive functions: A developmental perspective.视觉觅食与执行功能:发展视角
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Feb;193:203-213. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.01.005. Epub 2019 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Attention directs actions in visual foraging.注意力引导视觉觅食中的行动。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 6;15(1):15788. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97986-1.
2
The effect of target scarcity on visual foraging.目标稀缺对视觉觅食的影响。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Dec 4;11(12):240060. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240060. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Risky hybrid foraging: The impact of risk, reward value, and prevalence on foraging behavior in hybrid visual search.有风险的混合觅食:风险、奖励价值和发生率对混合视觉搜索中觅食行为的影响。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Nov 14. doi: 10.1037/xge0001652.
4
Foraging as sampling without replacement: A Bayesian statistical model for estimating biases in target selection.无替换采样觅食:一种用于估计目标选择偏差的贝叶斯统计模型。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Jan 24;18(1):e1009813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009813. eCollection 2022 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Order, please! Explicit sequence learning in hybrid search in younger and older age.请点餐!在年轻和老年的混合搜索中进行明确的序列学习。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Aug;49(6):1220-1235. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01157-2. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
2
Learning in anticipation of reward and punishment: perspectives across the human lifespan.期待奖惩的学习:人类生命周期的观点。
Neurobiol Aging. 2020 Dec;96:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.08.011. Epub 2020 Aug 22.
3
Visual Selection: Usually Fast and Automatic; Seldom Slow and Volitional.视觉选择:通常快速且自动;很少缓慢且出于意志。
J Cogn. 2018 May 14;1(1):29. doi: 10.5334/joc.13.
4
Dynamics of visual attention revealed in foraging tasks.视觉注意力在觅食任务中的动态变化。
Cognition. 2020 Jan;194:104032. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104032. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
5
Cognitive and motivational selectivity in healthy aging.健康老龄化中的认知和动机选择性。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2019 Nov;10(6):e1512. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1512. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
6
Cue-related processing accounts for age differences in phasic alerting.线索相关加工解释了相位警觉中年龄差异的原因。
Neurobiol Aging. 2019 Jul;79:93-100. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.03.017. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
7
Guidance and selection history in hybrid foraging visual search.混合觅食视觉搜索中的引导与选择历史
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Apr;81(3):637-653. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-01649-5.
8
Arousal increases neural gain via the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system in younger adults but not in older adults.在年轻人中,觉醒通过蓝斑 - 去甲肾上腺素系统增加神经增益,但在老年人中则不然。
Nat Hum Behav. 2018;2:356-366. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0344-1. Epub 2018 May 7.
9
Hybrid value foraging: How the value of targets shapes human foraging behavior.混合价值觅食:目标价值如何塑造人类觅食行为。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Apr;80(3):609-621. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1471-x.
10
Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention.选择历史:奖励如何调节视觉注意的选择性。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Apr;25(2):514-538. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1380-y.