• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过退伍军人事务部(VA)或医疗保险(Medicare),或两者来获取糖尿病药物:决策因素、挑战及信息需求

Filling Diabetes Medications Through VA or Medicare, or Both: Factors in Decision Making, Challenges, and Informational Needs.

作者信息

Hung Anna, Shapiro Abigail, Weidenbacher Hollis J, Brown Adrian D, Thomas Greeshma M, Lawrence Ellen B, Van Loon Katherine, Berkowitz Theodore S, Steinhauser Karen, Smith Valerie A, Kullgren Jeffrey T, Fagerlin Angela, Reed Shelby D, Maciejewski Matthew L, Thorpe Carolyn T

机构信息

Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.

Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2025 May 6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09576-6.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-025-09576-6
PMID:40329025
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Veterans' dual use of VA and Medicare Part D to fill diabetes medications is common and has advantages as well as disadvantages.

OBJECTIVE

To understand the factors Veterans and their care partners consider when choosing whether to fill their diabetes medications through VA only, Part D only, or both, as well as their medication acquisition challenges and informational needs.

APPROACH

Semi-structured interviews between April and September 2023. Transcripts were analyzed via descriptive content analysis with deductive and inductive approaches.

PARTICIPANTS

In total, 24 Veterans and 12 care partners.

MAIN MEASURES

Drivers of choice, medication acquisition challenges, and informational needs that Veterans and care partners report when choosing where to fill their diabetes medications.

KEY RESULTS

Cost, followed by formulary access, were main drivers of where Veterans and their care partners chose to fill their diabetes medications. Drive time, convenience, and preference for a particular provider were also considered, and care partners expressed a desire to streamline all of a Veteran's care to VA or Medicare for convenience and time savings. Veterans and care partners had mixed experiences with dual use, with some expressing frustration related to communication challenges between providers and incompatibilities between different health systems. Health-related risks associated with dual use were rarely mentioned. Veteran and care partner informational needs included relative costs and availability of medications on the formularies, and there was a preference to have direct access to information alongside telephone-based pharmacy support.

CONCLUSIONS

Cost and then medication access as well as drive time, convenience, and preference for a particular provider influenced Veteran and care partner choices on where to fill medications. Care partners often preferred one system. Differences and incompatibilities between VA and Medicare at times led to frustration and challenges filling medications. Information and support are needed to help Veterans and their care partners.

摘要

背景

退伍军人同时使用退伍军人事务部(VA)和医疗保险D部分来获取糖尿病药物的情况很常见,且有其利弊。

目的

了解退伍军人及其护理伙伴在选择仅通过VA、仅通过D部分还是同时通过两者来获取糖尿病药物时所考虑的因素,以及他们在药物获取方面面临的挑战和信息需求。

方法

2023年4月至9月进行半结构化访谈。通过描述性内容分析,采用演绎和归纳方法对访谈记录进行分析。

参与者

共有24名退伍军人和12名护理伙伴。

主要测量指标

退伍军人和护理伙伴在选择何处获取糖尿病药物时报告的选择驱动因素、药物获取挑战和信息需求。

关键结果

成本,其次是药品目录准入,是退伍军人及其护理伙伴选择何处获取糖尿病药物的主要驱动因素。驾驶时间、便利性以及对特定医疗机构的偏好也被纳入考虑,护理伙伴表示希望为方便和节省时间,将退伍军人的所有护理整合到VA或医疗保险中。退伍军人和护理伙伴在同时使用两种途径方面有不同的经历,一些人对提供者之间的沟通挑战以及不同医疗系统之间的不兼容性表示沮丧。很少有人提及同时使用两种途径带来的健康相关风险。退伍军人和护理伙伴的信息需求包括药品目录上药物的相对成本和可获得性,并且他们更倾向于在获得电话药房支持的同时能直接获取信息。

结论

成本、药品获取以及驾驶时间、便利性和对特定提供者的偏好影响了退伍军人和护理伙伴在何处获取药物的选择。护理伙伴通常更喜欢一种系统。VA和医疗保险之间的差异和不兼容性有时会导致在获取药物时产生沮丧和挑战。需要提供信息和支持来帮助退伍军人及其护理伙伴。

相似文献

1
Filling Diabetes Medications Through VA or Medicare, or Both: Factors in Decision Making, Challenges, and Informational Needs.通过退伍军人事务部(VA)或医疗保险(Medicare),或两者来获取糖尿病药物:决策因素、挑战及信息需求
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 May 6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09576-6.
2
Caregiver and provider perspectives on dual VA and Medicare Part D medication use in veterans with suspected dementia or cognitive impairment.照顾者和提供者对疑似痴呆或认知障碍的退伍军人同时使用 VA 和 Medicare Part D 药物的看法。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2022 Jan 5;79(2):94-101. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxab343.
3
Veteran Experiences Seeking Non-pharmacologic Approaches for Pain.退伍军人寻求非药物性疼痛治疗方法的经历。
Mil Med. 2018 Nov 1;183(11-12):e628-e634. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy018.
4
Why Veterans Choose VA Versus non-VA Emergency Care: A Qualitative Study.为什么退伍军人选择 VA 而非非-VA 紧急护理:一项定性研究。
Mil Med. 2024 Nov 5;189(11-12):e2655-e2664. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usae259.
5
The Impact of Dual Health Care System Use for Obtaining Prescription Medications on Nonadherence in Veterans With Type 2 Diabetes.双重医疗保健系统用于获取处方药物对 2 型糖尿病退伍军人用药依从性的影响。
Ann Pharmacother. 2019 Jul;53(7):675-682. doi: 10.1177/1060028019828681. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
6
"It's Like Finding Your Way Through the Labyrinth": a Qualitative Study of Veterans' Experiences Accessing Healthcare.“就像在迷宫中找到出路”:一项定性研究退伍军人获得医疗保健服务的体验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Mar;39(4):596-602. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08442-7. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
7
Erectile Dysfunction Medication Use in Veterans Eligible for Medicare Part D.符合医疗保险处方药计划资格的退伍军人使用勃起功能障碍药物。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Jul;22(7):818-24. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.7.818.
8
Web-based patient portal use and medication overlap from VA and private-sector pharmacies among older veterans.基于网络的患者门户使用情况以及老年退伍军人在退伍军人事务部和私营部门药店之间的药物重叠情况。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Aug;27(8):983-994. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.8.983.
9
The impact of patient-provider relationships on choosing between VA and VA-purchased care: A qualitative study of health care decision-making among rural veterans.患者与医疗服务提供者关系对退伍军人事务部(VA)医疗服务与VA购买的医疗服务选择的影响:一项关于农村退伍军人医疗决策的定性研究
J Rural Health. 2024 Jun;40(3):430-437. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12804. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
10
User Testing of the Veteran Delegation Tool: Qualitative Inquiry.退伍军人授权工具的用户测试:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 23;25:e40634. doi: 10.2196/40634.

本文引用的文献

1
Real-world use of a medication out-of-pocket cost estimator in primary care one year after Medicare regulation.医疗保险法规实施一年后,初级医疗中药物自付费用估算器的实际应用情况。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 May;72(5):1548-1552. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18774. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
2
Diabetes, gaps in care coordination, and preventable adverse events.糖尿病、护理协调差距和可预防的不良事件。
Am J Manag Care. 2023 Jun 1;29(6):e162-e168. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2023.89374.
3
The effects of patient out-of-pocket costs on insulin use among people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes with Medicare Advantage insurance-2014-2018.
2014 年至 2018 年间,具有联邦医疗保险优势计划的 1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者自付费用对胰岛素使用的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb;59(1):e14152. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14152. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
4
Self-reported gaps in care coordination and preventable adverse outcomes among older adults receiving home health care.老年人接受家庭保健服务时自我报告的护理协调差距和可预防的不良后果。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Mar;71(3):810-820. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18135. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
5
Frailty, gaps in care coordination, and preventable adverse events.虚弱,护理协调中的差距,以及可预防的不良事件。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jun 2;22(1):476. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03164-7.
6
How can healthcare organizations improve cost-of-care conversations? A qualitative exploration of clinicians' perspectives.医疗机构如何改善医疗成本沟通?对临床医生观点的定性探讨。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Aug;105(8):2708-2714. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.04.005. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
7
Changes in Type 2 Diabetes Medication Utilization and Costs in the United States, 2014-2019.2014-2019 年美国 2 型糖尿病药物使用和费用的变化。
Med Care. 2021 Sep 1;59(9):789-794. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001597.
8
Prescription drug coverage satisfaction, cost-reducing behavior, and medication nonadherence among Medicare beneficiaries with type 2 diabetes.医疗保险受益的 2 型糖尿病患者的处方药覆盖满意度、降低成本行为和药物不依从性。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Jun;27(6):696-705. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.6.696.
9
Association Between Patients' Self-Reported Gaps in Care Coordination and Preventable Adverse Outcomes: a Cross-Sectional Survey.患者报告的医疗协调差距与可预防不良结局之间的关联:一项横断面调查。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Dec;35(12):3517-3524. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06047-y. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
10
Impact of Higher Insulin Prices on Out-of-Pocket Costs in Medicare Part D.胰岛素价格上涨对医疗保险D部分自付费用的影响。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Apr;43(4):e50-e51. doi: 10.2337/dc19-1294. Epub 2020 Feb 10.