Suppr超能文献

2014 年至 2018 年间,具有联邦医疗保险优势计划的 1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者自付费用对胰岛素使用的影响。

The effects of patient out-of-pocket costs on insulin use among people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes with Medicare Advantage insurance-2014-2018.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice & Science, Optum Labs, Visiting Fellow, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.

Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah Pharmacotherapy Outcomes Research Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb;59(1):e14152. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14152. Epub 2023 Mar 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify the association between insulin out-of-pocket costs (OOPC) and adherence to insulin in Medicare Advantage (MA) patients.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING

The study is based on Optum Labs Data Warehouse, a longitudinal, real-world data asset with de-identified administrative claims and electronic health record data.

STUDY DESIGN

Using descriptive and multivariable logistic regression analyses, we identified the likelihood of patients with diabetes having ≥60 consecutive days between an expected insulin fill date and the actual fill date (refill lapse) by OOPC, categorized by $0, >$0-$20 (reference), >$20-$35, >$35-$50, and > $50 per 30-day supply.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: The study included MA enrollees with type 1 or type 2 diabetes and prescription claims for insulin between 2014 and 2018.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Those with average insulin OOPC per 30-day supply >$35 or $0 were more likely to have an insulin refill lapse versus OOPC of >$0 to $20, with odds ratios ranging 1.18 (95% CI 1.13-1.22) to 1.74 (95% CI 1.66-1.83) depending on OOPC group and diabetes type.

CONCLUSIONS

Capping average insulin OOPC at $35 per 30-day supply may help avoid cost-related insulin non-adherence in MA patients; efforts to address non-cost barriers to medication adherence remain important.

摘要

目的

确定医疗保险优势计划(MA)患者的胰岛素自付费用(OOPC)与胰岛素依从性之间的关联。

数据来源和研究设置

本研究基于 Optum Labs 数据仓库,这是一个具有去识别管理索赔和电子健康记录数据的纵向、真实世界数据资产。

研究设计

使用描述性和多变量逻辑回归分析,我们根据 OOPC 确定了患有糖尿病的患者在预期胰岛素填充日期和实际填充日期(填充 lapse)之间具有≥60 天连续天数的可能性,OOPC 分为 0 美元、$0-$20(参考)、>$20-$35、>$35-$50 和>$50 美元/30 天供应量。

数据收集/提取方法:该研究包括 2014 年至 2018 年间具有 1 型或 2 型糖尿病和胰岛素处方的 MA 参保人。

主要发现

与 OOPC 大于$0 至$20 的患者相比,OOPC 大于$35 或 0 美元的患者更有可能出现胰岛素填充 lapse,其优势比范围为 1.18(95% CI 1.13-1.22)至 1.74(95% CI 1.66-1.83),具体取决于 OOPC 组和糖尿病类型。

结论

将胰岛素 OOPC 的平均水平限制在 35 美元/30 天供应量可能有助于避免 MA 患者因费用相关而不依从胰岛素治疗;努力解决药物依从性的非成本障碍仍然很重要。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验