• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The effects of patient out-of-pocket costs on insulin use among people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes with Medicare Advantage insurance-2014-2018.2014 年至 2018 年间,具有联邦医疗保险优势计划的 1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者自付费用对胰岛素使用的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb;59(1):e14152. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14152. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
2
The effects of patient out-of-pocket costs for insulin on medication adherence and health care utilization in patients with commercial insurance; 2007-2018.2007-2018 年,商业保险患者胰岛素自付费用对药物依从性和医疗保健利用的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 May;28(5):494-506. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.21481. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
3
A Multichannel Medication Adherence Intervention Influences Patient and Prescriber Behavior.多通道药物依从性干预影响患者和处方行为。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 May;22(5):526-38. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.5.526.
4
Consequences of forgoing prescription drug subsidies among low-income Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes.放弃处方药物补贴对患有糖尿病的低收入医疗保险受益人的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct;57(5):1136-1144. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13990. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
5
The Association Between Type of Insurance Plan, Out-of-Pocket Cost, and Adherence to Antihypertensive Medications in Medicare Supplement Insurance Enrollees.医疗保险计划类型、自付费用与医疗保险补充计划参保者抗高血压药物治疗依从性之间的关系。
Am J Hypertens. 2024 Jul 15;37(8):631-639. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpae062.
6
Comparison of Diabetes Medications Used by Adults With Commercial Insurance vs Medicare Advantage, 2016 to 2019.2016 年至 2019 年商业保险与医疗保险优势计划中成年人使用的糖尿病药物比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2035792. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.35792.
7
Physician variation in the de-adoption of ineffective statin and fibrate therapy.医生在停用无效的他汀类药物和贝特类药物治疗方面的差异。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct;56(5):919-931. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13630. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
8
The effects of coding intensity in Medicare Advantage on plan benefits and finances.医疗保险优势计划中编码强度对计划福利和财务的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr;56(2):178-187. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13591. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
9
Comparison of Out-of-Pocket Spending on Ultra-Expensive Drugs in Medicare Part D vs Commercial Insurance.医疗保险部分 D 与商业保险中超昂贵药物自付费用比较。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 May 5;4(5):e231090. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.1090.
10
Low-Cost Generic Program Use by Medicare Beneficiaries: Implications for Medication Exposure Misclassification in Administrative Claims Data.医疗保险受益人的低成本通用药物计划使用:对行政索赔数据中药物暴露错误分类的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Jun;22(6):741-51. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.6.741.

引用本文的文献

1
Neighbourhood deprivation and quality of comprehensive diabetes care: findings from a national retrospective cohort study of US Medicare Advantage enrollees.邻里贫困与综合糖尿病护理质量:一项针对美国医疗保险优势参保人的全国性回顾性队列研究结果
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 28;15(7):e092971. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092971.
2
Adherence to GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors by out-of-pocket spending among Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes.医疗保险糖尿病受益人的自付费用对胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂和钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂的依从性。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Jul 16. doi: 10.1111/dom.16619.
3
Financial Toxicity in Diabetes: The State of What We Know.糖尿病中的经济毒性:我们所知的现状。
Curr Diab Rep. 2025 May 13;25(1):32. doi: 10.1007/s11892-025-01588-0.
4
Filling Diabetes Medications Through VA or Medicare, or Both: Factors in Decision Making, Challenges, and Informational Needs.通过退伍军人事务部(VA)或医疗保险(Medicare),或两者来获取糖尿病药物:决策因素、挑战及信息需求
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 May 6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09576-6.
5
Patient Out-of-Pocket Costs for Type 2 Diabetes Medications When Aging Into Medicare.当步入老年医保时,2 型糖尿病药物的患者自付费用。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2420724. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.20724.
6
Insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: Insights into clinical efficacy, patient-reported outcomes, and adherence challenges.2型糖尿病的胰岛素治疗:临床疗效、患者报告结局及依从性挑战的见解
World J Diabetes. 2024 May 15;15(5):828-852. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v15.i5.828.

本文引用的文献

1
9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023.9. 血糖治疗的药物学方法:2023 年糖尿病的护理标准。
Diabetes Care. 2023 Jan 1;46(Suppl 1):S140-S157. doi: 10.2337/dc23-S009.
2
Association of Out-of-Pocket Spending With Insulin Adherence in Medicare Part D.医疗保险处方药中外购支出与胰岛素依从性的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2033988. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.33988.
3
Effect of Medication Copayment on Adherence and Discontinuation in Medicare Beneficiaries with Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Administrative Claims Database Analysis.药物自付费用对医疗保险受益的2型糖尿病患者依从性和停药情况的影响:一项回顾性行政索赔数据库分析
Diabetes Ther. 2018 Oct;9(5):1979-1993. doi: 10.1007/s13300-018-0489-y. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
4
Insulin Access and Affordability Working Group: Conclusions and Recommendations.胰岛素可及性与可负担性工作组:结论与建议
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jun;41(6):1299-1311. doi: 10.2337/dci18-0019. Epub 2018 May 8.
5
Medication Adherence With Diabetes Medication: A Systematic Review of the Literature.糖尿病药物治疗的服药依从性:文献系统综述
Diabetes Educ. 2016 Feb;42(1):34-71. doi: 10.1177/0145721715619038. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
6
Validating the adapted Diabetes Complications Severity Index in claims data.验证索赔数据中经过改编的糖尿病并发症严重程度指数。
Am J Manag Care. 2012 Nov;18(11):721-6.
7
Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries.使用来自 6 个国家的数据更新和验证 Charlson 合并症指数和评分,以用于医院出院摘要的风险调整。
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Mar 15;173(6):676-82. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq433. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
8
Cost sharing, adherence, and health outcomes in patients with diabetes.糖尿病患者的费用分担、依从性和健康结果。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Aug;16(8):589-600.

2014 年至 2018 年间,具有联邦医疗保险优势计划的 1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者自付费用对胰岛素使用的影响。

The effects of patient out-of-pocket costs on insulin use among people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes with Medicare Advantage insurance-2014-2018.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice & Science, Optum Labs, Visiting Fellow, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.

Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah Pharmacotherapy Outcomes Research Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb;59(1):e14152. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14152. Epub 2023 Mar 29.

DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.14152
PMID:36992575
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10771896/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify the association between insulin out-of-pocket costs (OOPC) and adherence to insulin in Medicare Advantage (MA) patients.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING

The study is based on Optum Labs Data Warehouse, a longitudinal, real-world data asset with de-identified administrative claims and electronic health record data.

STUDY DESIGN

Using descriptive and multivariable logistic regression analyses, we identified the likelihood of patients with diabetes having ≥60 consecutive days between an expected insulin fill date and the actual fill date (refill lapse) by OOPC, categorized by $0, >$0-$20 (reference), >$20-$35, >$35-$50, and > $50 per 30-day supply.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: The study included MA enrollees with type 1 or type 2 diabetes and prescription claims for insulin between 2014 and 2018.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Those with average insulin OOPC per 30-day supply >$35 or $0 were more likely to have an insulin refill lapse versus OOPC of >$0 to $20, with odds ratios ranging 1.18 (95% CI 1.13-1.22) to 1.74 (95% CI 1.66-1.83) depending on OOPC group and diabetes type.

CONCLUSIONS

Capping average insulin OOPC at $35 per 30-day supply may help avoid cost-related insulin non-adherence in MA patients; efforts to address non-cost barriers to medication adherence remain important.

摘要

目的

确定医疗保险优势计划(MA)患者的胰岛素自付费用(OOPC)与胰岛素依从性之间的关联。

数据来源和研究设置

本研究基于 Optum Labs 数据仓库,这是一个具有去识别管理索赔和电子健康记录数据的纵向、真实世界数据资产。

研究设计

使用描述性和多变量逻辑回归分析,我们根据 OOPC 确定了患有糖尿病的患者在预期胰岛素填充日期和实际填充日期(填充 lapse)之间具有≥60 天连续天数的可能性,OOPC 分为 0 美元、$0-$20(参考)、>$20-$35、>$35-$50 和>$50 美元/30 天供应量。

数据收集/提取方法:该研究包括 2014 年至 2018 年间具有 1 型或 2 型糖尿病和胰岛素处方的 MA 参保人。

主要发现

与 OOPC 大于$0 至$20 的患者相比,OOPC 大于$35 或 0 美元的患者更有可能出现胰岛素填充 lapse,其优势比范围为 1.18(95% CI 1.13-1.22)至 1.74(95% CI 1.66-1.83),具体取决于 OOPC 组和糖尿病类型。

结论

将胰岛素 OOPC 的平均水平限制在 35 美元/30 天供应量可能有助于避免 MA 患者因费用相关而不依从胰岛素治疗;努力解决药物依从性的非成本障碍仍然很重要。