Suppr超能文献

[德国老年创伤急救中心(DGU®):在德国的分布与发展]

[Centers for geriatric trauma DGU® : Distribution and development in Germany].

作者信息

Stolberg-Stolberg Josef, Ramadan Charlotte, Köppe Jeanette, Iking Janette, Fischhuber Karen, Blätzinger Markus, Raschke Michael J, Katthagen J Christoph

机构信息

Arbeitsgruppe "Mathematical Surgery", Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Deutschland.

Klinik für Unfall‑, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Gebäude W1, 48149, Münster, Deutschland.

出版信息

Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2025 Jul;128(7):525-532. doi: 10.1007/s00113-025-01568-9. Epub 2025 May 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Due to the demographic changes, including the need for more orthogeriatric co-management, addressing the healthcare of geriatric patients is an important issue.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to create an overview of the fundamental characteristics of centers for geriatric trauma ATZ-DGU including the distribution of departments and cooperations as well as the level of trauma care. The distribution of sites across Germany was compared to hospital and population data.

METHODS

Certified German ATZ-DGU were assigned to Trauma Center DGU (TC) certification data (levels III-I) via institutional numbers. They were evaluated descriptively and correlations with several parameters at the federal states level were added.

RESULTS

Due to cooperations 188 institutions formed 147 ATZ-DGU and 152 provided orthogeriatric co-management in domo. Of the facilities with trauma surgery departments 86% (n = 168) were certified as TCs (level II = 33% > III = 30% > I = 22%). The number of ATZ-DGU per German state was correlated with the number of hospitals (r = 0.88), inhabitants (r = 0.92) and cases in total (r = 0.92, p < 0.001 each) but not with the proportion of people older than 65 years (p > 0.05). With only 14 facilities, the new federal states of Germany seemed to be disadvantaged and also showed great disparities compared to each other.

CONCLUSION

The levels of trauma care revealed a distribution referring to the different focus of the two certificates: treatment of the severely injured vs. geriatric co-treatment. On average, the population in the new German states was older, while there were less ATZ-DGU; however, there seemed to be a slight tendency towards improvement.

摘要

背景

由于人口结构的变化,包括对更多老年骨科联合管理的需求,解决老年患者的医疗保健问题是一个重要课题。

目的

本研究的目的是概述老年创伤中心ATZ-DGU的基本特征,包括科室分布、合作情况以及创伤护理水平。将德国各地的中心分布情况与医院和人口数据进行比较。

方法

通过机构编号将德国认证的ATZ-DGU分配到创伤中心DGU(TC)认证数据(III-I级)。对其进行描述性评估,并增加与联邦州一级几个参数的相关性分析。

结果

通过合作,188个机构组成了147个ATZ-DGU,152个机构在国内提供老年骨科联合管理。在设有创伤外科的机构中,86%(n = 168)被认证为TC(II级 = 33% > III级 = 30% > I级 = 22%)。德国每个州的ATZ-DGU数量与医院数量(r = 0.88)、居民数量(r = 0.92)和总病例数(r = 0.92,p均< 0.001)相关,但与65岁以上人群的比例无关(p > 0.05)。德国新联邦州只有14个机构,似乎处于劣势,且彼此之间也存在很大差异。

结论

创伤护理水平显示出与两种认证的不同重点相关的分布情况:重伤患者的治疗与老年联合治疗。平均而言,德国新联邦州的人口年龄较大,而ATZ-DGU较少;然而,似乎有轻微的改善趋势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验