• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与腰椎固定术后EOS X线摄影相比,C型臂在手术中评估骨盆入射角和腰椎前凸的准确性。

The accuracy of C-ARM in evaluating pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis during surgery compared with EOS radiography after lumbar fixation.

作者信息

Semiromi Hasan Toghraei, Chehrassan Mohammadreza, Bahardoust Mansour, Ghandhari Hasan, Esmaeli Abbas, Nikouei Farshad

机构信息

Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Yahyaeian Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2025 May 6;25(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02921-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12893-025-02921-w
PMID:40329329
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12054205/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Achieving the global spinal alignment, especially the pelvis, in spine surgeries is considered the most important factor in the success of these surgeries, which requires an accurate evaluation of the correction angles measured during surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the mobile C-arm X-ray machine (C-ARM) for measuring lumbar lordosis (LL) and pelvic incidence (PI) parameters during lumbar fixation.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 59 lumbar fixation candidates who underwent surgery between 2020 and 2022 at our medical center, were examined. PI and LL parameters were measured at the fusion site with fluoroscopy, during surgery with C-ARM, and after surgery with EOS locally.

RESULTS

The mean age was 54.69 ± 17.62 years. 42 (71.2%) were female. The mean PI based on intraoperative C-ARM and post-surgery EOS findings were 54.57 ± 11.19 and 54.83 ± 11.17, respectively, which this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.9). The mean LL estimate based on C-ARM and EOS findings was similar (P: 0.44).A significant positive linear correlation was observed for the mean PI (r: 0.97, p: 0.001) and LL (r: 0.99, p: 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The mean PI and LL angle during operation (measured with C-ARM) was similar to the mean of these parameters in EOS imaging findings after surgery. C-ARM can be used as a convenient device in the operating room with high precision to measure PI and LL values in spine surgeries.

摘要

背景

在脊柱手术中实现整体脊柱对线,尤其是骨盆对线,被认为是这些手术成功的最重要因素,这需要准确评估手术过程中测量的矫正角度。本研究旨在评估移动C形臂X光机(C形臂)在腰椎固定手术中测量腰椎前凸(LL)和骨盆入射角(PI)参数的准确性。

方法

在这项前瞻性研究中,对2020年至2022年期间在我们医疗中心接受手术的59名腰椎固定手术候选患者进行了检查。在融合部位通过透视测量PI和LL参数,在手术中使用C形臂测量,术后在当地使用EOS测量。

结果

平均年龄为54.69±17.62岁。42名(71.2%)为女性。基于术中C形臂和术后EOS检查结果的平均PI分别为54.57±11.19和54.83±11.17,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.9)。基于C形臂和EOS检查结果的平均LL估计值相似(P:0.44)。平均PI(r:0.97,p:0.001)和LL(r:0.99,p:0.001)之间存在显著的正线性相关性。

结论

手术过程中(用C形臂测量)的平均PI和LL角度与术后EOS成像检查结果中这些参数的平均值相似。C形臂可作为手术室中一种方便的设备,以高精度测量脊柱手术中的PI和LL值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c082/12054205/8bb25e292a38/12893_2025_2921_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c082/12054205/f7157d0e8d0c/12893_2025_2921_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c082/12054205/8bb25e292a38/12893_2025_2921_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c082/12054205/f7157d0e8d0c/12893_2025_2921_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c082/12054205/8bb25e292a38/12893_2025_2921_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The accuracy of C-ARM in evaluating pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis during surgery compared with EOS radiography after lumbar fixation.与腰椎固定术后EOS X线摄影相比,C型臂在手术中评估骨盆入射角和腰椎前凸的准确性。
BMC Surg. 2025 May 6;25(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02921-w.
2
Association of Sagittal Spinopelvic Realignment with Correction in Lower Lumbar Lordosis after Surgical Treatment in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis.矢状位脊柱骨盆参数矫正与退行性腰椎侧凸后路矫形术后下腰椎前凸改善的相关性。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Oct;13(7):2034-2042. doi: 10.1111/os.13138. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
3
Georg Schmorl Prize of the German Spine Society (DWG) 2017: correction of spino-pelvic alignment with relordosing mono- and bisegmental TLIF spondylodesis.2017年德国脊柱协会(DWG)格奥尔格·施莫尔奖:通过后凸单节段和双节段经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)进行脊柱-骨盆对线矫正
Eur Spine J. 2018 Apr;27(4):789-796. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5503-6. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
4
[Consistency comparison of the parameters of the lumbar spine-pelvic sagittal plane between the whole-spine EOS images system and traditional X-ray].全脊柱EOS影像系统与传统X线腰椎-骨盆矢状面参数的一致性比较
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2021 Jul 25;34(11):1082-6. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2021.11.018.
5
The Lumbar Pelvic Angle, the Lumbar Component of the T1 Pelvic Angle, Correlates With HRQOL, PI-LL Mismatch, and it Predicts Global Alignment.腰椎骨盆角、T1 骨盆角的腰椎成分与 HRQOL、PI-LL 不匹配相关,可预测整体对线。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 May 15;43(10):681-687. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002346.
6
Optimal Pelvic Incidence Minus Lumbar Lordosis Mismatch after Long Posterior Instrumentation and Fusion for Adult Degenerative Scoliosis.成人退变性脊柱侧凸后路长节段内固定融合术后骨盆入射角与腰椎前凸角的最佳失配情况
Orthop Surg. 2017 Aug;9(3):304-310. doi: 10.1111/os.12343.
7
Lumbo-pelvic related indexes: impact on adult spinal deformity surgery.腰骶骨盆相关指标:对成人脊柱畸形手术的影响
Eur Spine J. 2015 Jun;24(6):1212-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3402-z. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
8
Spine-Pelvis-Hip Alignments in Degenerative Spinal Deformity Patients and Associated Procedure of One-Stage Long-Fusion with Multiple-Level PLIF or Apical-Vertebra Three Column Osteotomy-a Clinical and Radiographic Analysis Study.退变性脊柱畸形患者的脊柱骨盆髋部对线及其一期长节段融合伴多节段 PLIF 或顶椎三柱截骨术的相关手术:一项临床与影像学分析研究。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Oct;13(7):2008-2017. doi: 10.1111/os.13059. Epub 2021 Sep 19.
9
Impact of pelvic anteversion on spinopelvic alignment in an asymptomatic population: a dynamic perspective of standing and sitting.骨盆前倾对无症状人群脊柱骨盆矢状位排列的影响:站立位和坐位的动态观察。
Spine J. 2024 Sep;24(9):1732-1739. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.04.001. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
10
Is pelvic incidence a constant, as everyone knows? Changes of pelvic incidence in surgically corrected adult sagittal deformity.众所周知,骨盆入射角是一个固定值吗?手术矫正的成人矢状面畸形中骨盆入射角的变化。
Eur Spine J. 2016 Nov;25(11):3707-3714. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4199-0. Epub 2015 Aug 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of the type of brace on head to pelvis sagittal alignment of adolescents with Scheuermann's kyphosis.支具类型对Scheuermann 脊柱后凸症青少年头到骨盆矢状面排列的影响。
Assist Technol. 2023 Sep 3;35(5):399-408. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2022.2102092. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
2
Influence of Sagittal Lumbopelvic Morphotypes on the Range of Motion of Human Lumbar Spine: An In Vitro Cadaveric Study.矢状面腰骶部形态类型对人体腰椎活动范围的影响:一项体外尸体研究。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 May 20;9(5):224. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9050224.
3
Trends in lumbar spinal fusion-a literature review.
腰椎融合术的发展趋势——文献综述
J Spine Surg. 2020 Dec;6(4):752-761. doi: 10.21037/jss-20-492.
4
Sagittal balance of the spine.脊柱矢状平衡。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Feb;107(1S):102769. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.102769. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
5
The spino-pelvic ratio: a novel global sagittal parameter associated with clinical outcomes in adult spinal deformity patients.骨盆倾斜度比值:与成人脊柱畸形患者临床结果相关的一种新的整体矢状参数。
Eur Spine J. 2020 Sep;29(9):2354-2361. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06472-x. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
6
Intraoperatively predicting postoperative sagittal balance using intraoperative X-rays.术中使用术中X线预测术后矢状面平衡。
J Clin Neurosci. 2019 May;63:48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.02.008. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
7
Accuracy of the lateral cage placement under intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy in oblique lateral interbody fusion.术中C形臂荧光透视引导下斜外侧椎间融合术中椎间融合器外侧放置的准确性
J Orthop Sci. 2018 Nov;23(6):918-922. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.07.010. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
8
Radiological outcome of postoperative sagittal balance on standing radiographs in comparison to intraoperative radiographs in prone position when performing lumbar spinal fusion.在进行腰椎融合手术时,站立位X线片上术后矢状面平衡的影像学结果与俯卧位术中X线片的比较。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Oct;137(10):1319-1325. doi: 10.1007/s00402-017-2755-2. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
9
Image quality and effective dose of a robotic flat panel 3D C-arm vs computed tomography.机器人平板3D C型臂与计算机断层扫描的图像质量和有效剂量
Int J Med Robot. 2016 Dec;12(4):743-750. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1718. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
10
Validation of a new computer-assisted tool to measure spino-pelvic parameters.一种用于测量脊柱-骨盆参数的新型计算机辅助工具的验证
Spine J. 2015 Dec 1;15(12):2493-502. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.08.067. Epub 2015 Sep 4.