Takaoka Yuri, Tsurinaga Yuki, Hiraguchi Yukiko, Hamada Masaaki, Nakano Atsuko, Kawakami Tomoko, Okafuji Ikuo, Iwakoshi Nayu, Doi Masaaki, Otsuka Keita, Sugimoto Yukiko, Iba Norihito, Kumon Junko, Ueno Rumi, Nakano Tamana, Yamaguchi Tomohiro, Fuksawa Yohei, Shigekawa Amane, Yoshida Yukinori, Kameda Makoto
Department of Pediatrics, Osaka Prefectural Hospital Organization Osaka Habikino Medical Center, Habikino, Osaka, Japan.
Department of Pediatrics, Osaka Saiseikai Nakatsu Hospital, Shibata, Kita, Osaka, Japan.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2025 Apr 10;4(3):100471. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2025.100471. eCollection 2025 Aug.
Clinical research on pediatric shrimp allergy is limited.
We sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and safety of testing methods for shrimp allergy.
An oral food challenge (OFC) for shrimp was conducted on Japanese children with suspected shrimp allergy. Before the OFC, shrimp-, tropomyosin-, house dust mite-, and cockroach-specific IgE levels were measured, along with skin prick tests (SPTs). OFC results using epinephrine as a safety indicator determined persistent, mild, or tolerant shrimp allergy.
Sixty-six children (median age, 6 years) underwent the OFC. All patients demonstrated house dust mite-specific IgE level exceeding 0.35 IUA/mL. Sixteen were diagnosed with persistent shrimp allergy, defined by Anaphylaxis Scoring Aichi scores greater than or equal to 10 or scores of 5 with urticaria. A 15-year-old required epinephrine for anaphylaxis. Eight children with negative results (scores ≤ 9) reported mild symptoms after repeated home ingestion following the OFC. Median SPT wheal diameters in persistent, mild allergic, and tolerant groups were similarly elevated (8.5 vs 9.5 vs 8.0 mm; = .99). Patients with persistent shrimp allergy had higher median shrimp- and tropomyosin-specific IgE level than those classified as mild or tolerant (shrimp: 73.5 vs 30.0 vs 9.4 IUA/mL; = .01; tropomyosin: 68.0 vs 41.9 vs 11.5 IUA/mL; = .16). Receiver-operating characteristic analysis determined optimal IgE cutoff values as 58.2 IUA/mL for shrimp-specific IgE and 33.5 IUA/mL for tropomyosin-specific IgE.
SPT showed limited symptom correlation, whereas shrimp-specific IgE demonstrated greater diagnostic value than tropomyosin-specific IgE. No IgE cutoff accurately predicts a successfully passed OFC.
关于儿童虾过敏的临床研究有限。
我们试图评估虾过敏检测方法的诊断准确性和安全性。
对疑似虾过敏的日本儿童进行虾的口服食物激发试验(OFC)。在OFC之前,测量虾、原肌球蛋白、屋尘螨和蟑螂特异性IgE水平,以及皮肤点刺试验(SPT)。以肾上腺素作为安全指标的OFC结果确定持续性、轻度或耐受性虾过敏。
66名儿童(中位年龄6岁)接受了OFC。所有患者的屋尘螨特异性IgE水平均超过0.35 IUA/mL。16名被诊断为持续性虾过敏,定义为过敏性休克爱知评分大于或等于10或伴有荨麻疹的评分为5分。一名15岁儿童因过敏反应需要使用肾上腺素。8名结果为阴性(评分≤9)的儿童在OFC后在家中反复食用后报告有轻微症状。持续性、轻度过敏和耐受性组的SPT风团直径中位数同样升高(8.5 vs 9.5 vs 8.0 mm;P = 0.99)。持续性虾过敏患者的虾和原肌球蛋白特异性IgE水平中位数高于分类为轻度或耐受性的患者(虾:73.5 vs 30.0 vs 9.4 IUA/mL;P = 0.01;原肌球蛋白:68.0 vs 41.9 vs 11.5 IUA/mL;P = 0.16)。受试者工作特征分析确定虾特异性IgE的最佳IgE临界值为58.2 IUA/mL,原肌球蛋白特异性IgE为33.5 IUA/mL。
SPT显示出有限的症状相关性,而虾特异性IgE比原肌球蛋白特异性IgE具有更大的诊断价值。没有IgE临界值能准确预测成功通过的OFC。