• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性缺血性卒中的溶栓治疗:进展与更新

Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke: development and update.

作者信息

Lin Jiashuo, Zuo Wenbo, Jin Huijuan, He Quanwei, Chen Shengcai, Hu Bo, Wan Yan

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.

出版信息

Brain Commun. 2025 Apr 28;7(3):fcaf164. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf164. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1093/braincomms/fcaf164
PMID:40331091
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12053151/
Abstract

Thrombolytic therapy is a cornerstone in managing acute ischaemic stroke, marking significant advancements in treatment. Various generations of thrombolytics play crucial roles in different strategies, including intravenous thrombolysis, bridging therapy and thrombolysis beyond the conventional time window. The continuous development of thrombolytics has brought notable improvements. Compared to first-generation urokinase, second-generation alteplase and third-generation tenecteplase offer significant pharmacological advantages, such as enhanced fibrin specificity and longer half-lives. Tenecteplase demonstrates non-inferiority to alteplase regarding efficacy and safety, with the added benefit of a more convenient administration method. Ongoing trials continue to reveal additional evidence. Furthermore, other thrombolytic agents, including reteplase and non-immunogenic recombinant staphylokinase, are gaining increasing interest in the medical community. This review examines the structural characteristics, pharmacological properties, efficacy and safety profiles of these thrombolytic drugs. It also provides a detailed analysis of the performance of thrombolytic therapy in different acute ischaemic stroke patient subgroups, aiming to trace the evolution of these treatments and compare their effectiveness in acute ischaemic stroke. The goal is to offer a scientific basis for clinical practices and future development of thrombolytic therapies.

摘要

溶栓治疗是急性缺血性脑卒中治疗的基石,标志着治疗取得了重大进展。不同代际的溶栓药物在不同策略中发挥着关键作用,包括静脉溶栓、桥接治疗以及超越传统时间窗的溶栓治疗。溶栓药物的不断发展带来了显著改善。与第一代尿激酶相比,第二代阿替普酶和第三代替奈普酶具有显著的药理学优势,如增强的纤维蛋白特异性和更长的半衰期。替奈普酶在疗效和安全性方面不劣于阿替普酶,且给药方法更便捷。正在进行的试验不断揭示更多证据。此外,其他溶栓药物,包括瑞替普酶和非免疫原性重组葡激酶,在医学界正受到越来越多的关注。本综述考察了这些溶栓药物的结构特征、药理学特性、疗效和安全性概况。还对不同急性缺血性脑卒中患者亚组中溶栓治疗的表现进行了详细分析,旨在追溯这些治疗方法的演变,并比较它们在急性缺血性脑卒中中的有效性。目的是为溶栓治疗的临床实践和未来发展提供科学依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3da1/12053151/e5cda662f7c3/fcaf164_ga.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3da1/12053151/e5cda662f7c3/fcaf164_ga.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3da1/12053151/e5cda662f7c3/fcaf164_ga.jpg

相似文献

1
Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke: development and update.急性缺血性卒中的溶栓治疗:进展与更新
Brain Commun. 2025 Apr 28;7(3):fcaf164. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf164. eCollection 2025.
2
Non-immunogenic recombinant staphylokinase versus alteplase for patients with acute ischaemic stroke 4·5 h after symptom onset in Russia (FRIDA): a randomised, open label, multicentre, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial.俄罗斯(FRIDA)研究:症状发作后 4.5 小时的急性缺血性脑卒中患者使用非免疫原性重组葡激酶与阿替普酶的比较:一项随机、开放标签、多中心、平行组、非劣效性试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2021 Sep;20(9):721-728. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00210-6.
3
Tenecteplase or Alteplase: What Is the Thrombolytic Agent of the Future?替奈普酶还是阿替普酶:未来的溶栓药物是什么?
Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2022;24(10):503-513. doi: 10.1007/s11940-022-00733-4. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
4
Thrombolytic agents for acute ischaemic stroke treatment: the past, present and future.急性缺血性脑卒中溶栓治疗药物:过去、现在与未来。
CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2013 Mar;12(2):145-54. doi: 10.2174/18715273113129990057.
5
Thrombolysis (different doses, routes of administration and agents) for acute ischaemic stroke.急性缺血性卒中的溶栓治疗(不同剂量、给药途径和药物)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 May 31;2013(5):CD000514. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000514.pub3.
6
Thrombolytic therapy for patients with acute ischemic stroke: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials.急性缺血性中风患者的溶栓治疗:随机试验的系统评价和网状荟萃分析
Front Neurol. 2025 Jan 7;15:1490476. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1490476. eCollection 2024.
7
Tenecteplase versus alteplase for the management of acute ischaemic stroke in Norway (NOR-TEST 2, part A): a phase 3, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint, non-inferiority trial.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗挪威急性缺血性卒中(NOR-TEST 2,A部分):一项3期随机开放标签盲终点非劣效性试验
Lancet Neurol. 2022 Jun;21(6):511-519. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00124-7. Epub 2022 May 4.
8
Clinical potential of intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute ischaemic stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中患者动脉内溶栓治疗的临床潜力
CNS Drugs. 2003;17(4):213-24. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200317040-00001.
9
Third generation thrombolytics for the treatment of ischemic stroke.用于治疗缺血性中风的第三代溶栓剂。
Curr Opin Investig Drugs. 2002 Dec;3(12):1729-32.
10
Tenecteplase versus alteplase in acute ischaemic cerebrovascular events (TRACE-2): a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性脑血管事件的疗效对比(TRACE-2):一项3期、多中心、开放标签、随机对照、非劣效性试验
Lancet. 2023 Feb 25;401(10377):645-654. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02600-9. Epub 2023 Feb 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of bridging intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.机械取栓术前桥接静脉溶栓的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2025 Sep 3:15910199251368728. doi: 10.1177/15910199251368728.

本文引用的文献

1
Tenecteplase thrombolytic therapy for acute ischaemic stroke in China: a real-world, multicentre, retrospective, controlled study.中国替奈普酶溶栓治疗急性缺血性卒中:一项真实世界、多中心、回顾性对照研究
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2024 Nov 13. doi: 10.1136/svn-2024-003381.
2
Tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute stroke within 4·5 h of onset (ATTEST-2): a randomised, parallel group, open-label trial.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗发病 4·5 h 内急性脑卒中的比较(ATTEST-2):一项随机、平行分组、开放标签试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2024 Nov;23(11):1087-1096. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00377-6.
3
Dual Antiplatelet Versus Alteplase for Early Neurologic Deterioration in Minor Stroke With Versus Without Large Vessel Occlusion: Prespecified Post Hoc Analysis of the ARAMIS Trial.
双联抗血小板与阿替普酶治疗小卒中伴与不伴大血管闭塞患者早期神经功能恶化:ARAMIS 试验的预设事后分析。
Stroke. 2024 Nov;55(11):2590-2598. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048248. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
4
Reteplase versus Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke.瑞替普酶与阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2024 Jun 27;390(24):2264-2273. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2400314. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
5
Functional Outcome and Hemorrhage Rates After Bridging Therapy With Tenecteplase or Alteplase in Patients With Large Ischemic Core.大缺血核心患者应用替奈普酶或阿替普酶桥接治疗后的功能结局和出血率。
Neurology. 2024 Jul 9;103(1):e209398. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209398. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
6
Tenecteplase versus standard of care for minor ischaemic stroke with proven occlusion (TEMPO-2): a randomised, open label, phase 3 superiority trial.替奈普酶治疗伴证实闭塞的小面积缺血性脑卒中与标准治疗的比较(TEMPO-2):一项随机、开放标签、3 期优效性试验。
Lancet. 2024 Jun 15;403(10444):2597-2605. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00921-8. Epub 2024 May 17.
7
Stroke.中风。
Lancet. 2024 Jun 29;403(10446):2820-2836. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00642-1. Epub 2024 May 14.
8
Intravenous thrombolysis in patients with recent intake of direct oral anticoagulants: A target trial analysis after the liberalization of institutional guidelines.近期服用直接口服抗凝药物患者的静脉溶栓治疗:机构指南放宽后的目标试验分析。
Eur Stroke J. 2024 Dec;9(4):959-967. doi: 10.1177/23969873241252751. Epub 2024 May 13.
9
Real-world data of tenecteplase vs. alteplase in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a single-center analysis.替奈普酶与阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性卒中的真实世界数据:一项单中心分析。
Front Neurol. 2024 Apr 19;15:1386386. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1386386. eCollection 2024.
10
Global incidence, prevalence, years lived with disability (YLDs), disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 371 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.全球疾病、伤害和危险因素负担研究 2021 年,1990-2021 年全球 204 个国家和地区及 811 个次国家地区 371 种疾病和伤害的发病率、患病率、伤残损失生命年(YLDs)、伤残调整生命年(DALYs)以及健康期望寿命(HALE):系统分析
Lancet. 2024 May 18;403(10440):2133-2161. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00757-8. Epub 2024 Apr 17.