Xavier Andrew R, Siddiqui Amir M, Kirmani Jawad F, Hanel Ricardo A, Yahia Abutaher M, Qureshi Adnan I
Department of Neurology and Neurosciences, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey - New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey 07103, USA.
CNS Drugs. 2003;17(4):213-24. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200317040-00001.
Acute ischaemic stroke is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity around the world. An arterial occlusive lesion is found in the majority of patients with acute ischaemic stroke, and recanalisation has been shown to result in a better clinical outcome. The only widely approved recanalisation strategy is the use of intravenous alteplase (recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator; tPA) within 3 hours of stroke onset. However, this therapy has limitations, and alternative or supplemental recanalisation strategies need to be considered in a large number of patients with acute ischaemic stroke. One such promising strategy is intra-arterial thrombolysis. This article reviews the pharmacology of the various drugs used for intra-arterial thrombolysis in the setting of acute ischaemic stroke and the results of the clinical trials that have studied their benefit. Three generations of thrombolytic agents have been available for clinical use so far. The first-generation agents such as streptokinase and urokinase were the first to be studied in acute stroke, and a number of positive case reports and series of their intra-arterial use have been reported from around the world. Second-generation products include alteplase and pro-urokinase. The clinical benefits of intra-arterial pro-urokinase were recently proven in a randomised, placebo-controlled study. Third-generation agents, such as reteplase, lanoteplase and tenecteplase, offer superior recanalisation rates with limited systemic adverse effects and might prove to be the agents of choice for intra-arterial acute stroke thrombolysis in the future. The exact administration regimens as well as the identification of patient sub-populations most likely to benefit from intra-arterial thrombolysis are subjects of current investigations, and hopefully firmer guidelines will be established in the next few years, once the results of the clinical trials are available.
急性缺血性中风是全球死亡和发病的主要原因。大多数急性缺血性中风患者存在动脉闭塞性病变,而再通已被证明可带来更好的临床结果。唯一广泛认可的再通策略是在中风发作3小时内使用静脉注射阿替普酶(重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂;tPA)。然而,这种治疗方法存在局限性,对于大量急性缺血性中风患者,需要考虑替代或补充性的再通策略。动脉内溶栓就是这样一种有前景的策略。本文综述了在急性缺血性中风情况下用于动脉内溶栓的各种药物的药理学以及研究其益处的临床试验结果。到目前为止,已有三代溶栓药物可供临床使用。第一代药物如链激酶和尿激酶是最早在急性中风中进行研究的,世界各地已报道了许多关于其动脉内使用的阳性病例报告和系列研究。第二代产品包括阿替普酶和尿激酶原。动脉内尿激酶原的临床益处最近在一项随机、安慰剂对照研究中得到证实。第三代药物,如瑞替普酶、拉诺替普酶和替奈普酶,再通率更高,全身不良反应有限,未来可能被证明是动脉内急性中风溶栓的首选药物。确切的给药方案以及确定最可能从动脉内溶栓中获益的患者亚组是当前研究的课题,一旦临床试验结果出来,有望在未来几年制定更明确的指南。