Lidauer Saara M, Hoppu Sanna, Kaartinen Kaius, Lidauer Martin H, Kalliomäki Maija-Liisa
Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Emergency Medical Services, Centre for Prehospital Emergency Care, Pirkanmaa Wellbeing Services County, Tampere, Finland.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025 Jul;69(6):e70047. doi: 10.1111/aas.70047.
Pain management is an important part of prehospital care. Pain assessment and recognition are inseparable in adequate pain treatment. However, relatively scarce literature is available from Nordic and European countries. We investigated the current practices of pain assessment and management in the Emergency Medical Service (EMS) of one Finnish hospital area.
The cohort data were originally collected prospectively to assess various quality processes in EMS. This study was designed as a descriptive, retrospective, register-based cohort study, analysing data from 7245 patients encountered by EMS over a one-month period in the Tampere University Hospital area of Finland in 2021. Pain levels were primarily assessed using the numeric rating scale (NRS). Records were combined with auxiliary data from the National Emergency Response Centre Agency. We grouped patients into six age groups and recorded dispatch categories in seven groups to clarify the impact of age and dispatch category on pain assessment and intensity. We used crosstabulation and Pearson's chi-square test for statistical analyses; we also applied a linear mixed model to analyse the effect of pain medication on pain intensity.
Pain was assessed once in 2586 (36%) patients and then reassessed a second time for 707 (27%) of those patients. Age and dispatch category affected pain intensity (p < 0.001): Patients under 66 reported higher pain intensity than patients over 66 years. In dispatch categories, "oxygen deficiency" and "non-mechanical accident or exposure," reported pain intensity was minimal compared to other categories. Of the patients with a pain assessment, 611 (24%) experienced pain equal to or greater than 4 on the NRS scale. We found that assessment with a high NRS level was associated with a higher likelihood of administering potent pain medication.
The prevalence of pain assessment is relatively low. The diverse nature of EMS interventions must be considered when improving pain management strategies.
疼痛管理是院前护理的重要组成部分。在充分的疼痛治疗中,疼痛评估和识别密不可分。然而,北欧和欧洲国家的相关文献相对较少。我们调查了芬兰某医院地区紧急医疗服务(EMS)中疼痛评估和管理的当前实践情况。
队列数据最初是前瞻性收集的,用于评估EMS中的各种质量流程。本研究设计为一项描述性、回顾性、基于登记的队列研究,分析了2021年芬兰坦佩雷大学医院地区EMS在一个月内遇到的7245例患者的数据。疼痛程度主要使用数字评分量表(NRS)进行评估。记录与国家应急响应中心机构的辅助数据相结合。我们将患者分为六个年龄组,并将派遣类别记录为七组,以阐明年龄和派遣类别对疼痛评估和强度的影响。我们使用交叉表和Pearson卡方检验进行统计分析;我们还应用线性混合模型来分析止痛药对疼痛强度的影响。
2586例(36%)患者进行了一次疼痛评估,其中707例(27%)患者随后进行了第二次重新评估。年龄和派遣类别影响疼痛强度(p < 0.001):66岁以下患者报告的疼痛强度高于66岁以上患者。在派遣类别中,与其他类别相比,“缺氧”和“非机械事故或暴露”报告的疼痛强度最小。在进行疼痛评估的患者中,611例(24%)的疼痛程度在NRS量表上等于或大于4。我们发现,NRS评分高的评估与使用强效止痛药的可能性更高相关。
疼痛评估的普及率相对较低。在改进疼痛管理策略时,必须考虑EMS干预措施的多样性。