Häske D, Schempf B, Gaier G, Niederberger C
Rettungsdienst, DRK Kreisverband Reutlingen, Obere Wässere 1, 72764, Reutlingen, Deutschland,
Anaesthesist. 2014 Mar;63(3):209-16. doi: 10.1007/s00101-014-2301-3. Epub 2014 Feb 23.
In the context of the new education program for German paramedics, a discussion has been fueled regarding the emergency care competencies of paramedics. In 1999 a system for training and qualification of paramedics was established in the emergency medical service (EMS) area of Reutlingen (Germany), including an algorithm for analgesia using ketamine and midazolam. Under defined circumstances analgesia may be administered to patients in the absence of a physician.
The objectives of the study were to evaluate the effectiveness of pain reduction measured by a recognized assessment scale and the safety of analgesia with ketamine and midazolam administered by paramedics. This study specifically focused on the medical results and associated processes and not on the legal aspects.
In a retrospective analysis analgesia performed by paramedics who had undergone standardized training with annual controls and under medical supervision was investigated with regard to administration processes and efficacy. Analysis endpoints included vital signs at baseline and on transfer to the emergency department, pain score as defined by a numeric rating scale (NRS 0-10), the amount of ketamine administered and the occurrence of side effects (e.g. respiratory and circulatory disorders, nausea, qualitative and quantitative disturbance of consciousness).
A total of 528 instances of analgesia performed by paramedics were registered. The average patient age was 48 ± 23 years (range 5-95 years). Trauma to the extremities was the most common indication for the administration of analgesia with 48 % and 38 % attributable to the upper and lower extremities, respectively. Serious complications were not observed. Administration of analgesia resulted in a highly significant reduction in pain scores (NRS p<0.0001). Mean initial pain score was 8 with an interquartile range (IQR) of 7-8 and a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of 7.5-7.9 which was decreased to 3 (IQR 2-3, 95% CI 2.2-2.7) on transfer to the emergency department. The number of patients with a pain score of NRS ≤4 in the emergency department was 96 % (n=506). All other vital signs were essentially unchanged and the rate of side effects was low (2.8 %). Potentially life-threatening complications were not reported. The mean midazolam dosage administered was 1 ± 0.4 mg and the mean dosage of ketamine was 27 ± 12 mg. The investigation was limited by restricted documentation and patients who were not treated with analgesics were not included in the study.
After appropriate training and regular control analgesia administered by paramedics in the present system was safely and effectively applied.
在德国护理人员新教育计划的背景下,引发了关于护理人员急救能力的讨论。1999年,在德国罗伊特林根的紧急医疗服务(EMS)领域建立了护理人员培训和资格认证系统,包括使用氯胺酮和咪达唑仑进行镇痛的算法。在特定情况下,可在没有医生在场的情况下对患者进行镇痛。
本研究的目的是通过公认的评估量表评估疼痛减轻的有效性以及护理人员使用氯胺酮和咪达唑仑进行镇痛的安全性。本研究特别关注医疗结果和相关过程,而非法律方面。
在一项回顾性分析中,对接受过标准化培训且每年接受检查并在医疗监督下的护理人员所实施的镇痛进行了给药过程和疗效方面的调查。分析终点包括基线时和转至急诊科时的生命体征、数字评分量表(NRS 0 - 10)定义的疼痛评分、氯胺酮给药量以及副作用的发生情况(如呼吸和循环系统紊乱、恶心、意识的定性和定量障碍)。
共记录了护理人员实施的528例镇痛案例。患者平均年龄为48±23岁(范围5 - 95岁)。四肢创伤是最常见的镇痛适应证,其中上肢创伤占48%,下肢创伤占38%。未观察到严重并发症。镇痛给药使疼痛评分显著降低(NRS p<0.0001)。初始平均疼痛评分为8分,四分位间距(IQR)为7 - 8分,95%置信区间(95%CI)为7.5 - 7.9分,转至急诊科时降至3分(IQR 2 - 3分,95%CI 2.2 - 2.7分)。在急诊科疼痛评分为NRS≤4分的患者比例为96%(n = 506)。所有其他生命体征基本未变,副作用发生率较低(2.8%)。未报告有潜在生命危险的并发症。咪达唑仑平均给药剂量为1±0.4mg,氯胺酮平均剂量为27±12mg。该调查受到记录有限的限制,未接受镇痛治疗的患者未纳入研究。
在本系统中,护理人员经过适当培训并定期接受检查后,所实施的镇痛是安全有效的。