Ramos André Luis Paes, Seta Marismary Horsth De, Battesini Marcelo
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca. Programa de Pós-graduação em Saúde Pública. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Gestão de Organizações Públicas. Santa Maria, RS, Brasil.
Rev Saude Publica. 2025 May 2;59:e6. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2025059006346. eCollection 2025.
To analyze efficiency in primary health care in Brazilian state capitals in the period 2008-2019, considering the management model: direct public administration or administration assigned to third parties.
This is an evaluative study with an analytical objective, using publicly available secondary data, analyzed cross-sectionally (2019) and longitudinally (2008, 2012, 2016, and 2019). Demographic and socioeconomic data and seven indicators related to primary health care were used to characterize the cities and their primary health care (primary care coverage, hospitalizations for primary care-sensitive conditions, tuberculosis cures, infant, maternal, and premature mortality due to chronic conditions, incidence of congenital syphilis). To these indicators were added health and primary health care expenditures and data envelopment analysis focused on outputs (without admitting a reduction in expenditures) to calculate efficiency in 2008, 2012, 2016, and 2019. The Malmquist index was used to identify possible productivity gains between 2008 and 2019.
Four capitals identified as being managed by third parties (São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Porto Alegre, and Fortaleza) did not achieve greater efficiency compared to direct public administration, nor did they evolve when comparing their own results over time. In 2019, and in the longitudinal approach, only capitals managed by direct public administration obtained the maximum relative efficiency index in the comparison between capitals. Twelve capitals with direct public administration remained efficient in all years, while those with third-party administration consistently showed weak inefficiency in primary health care, i.e. in the period studied, the relationship between investments in primary health care and results obtained is lower than that achieved by the efficient capitals.
We found no evidence of efficiency gains with the adoption of third-party management. It should be noted that productive efficiency does not necessarily mean that health needs are met.
分析2008 - 2019年巴西州首府初级卫生保健的效率,同时考虑管理模式:直接公共管理或委托第三方管理。
这是一项具有分析目标的评估研究,使用公开可得的二手数据,进行横断面分析(2019年)和纵向分析(2008年、2012年、2016年和2019年)。利用人口和社会经济数据以及七个与初级卫生保健相关的指标来描述各城市及其初级卫生保健情况(初级保健覆盖率、初级保健敏感疾病住院率、结核病治愈率、慢性病导致的婴儿、孕产妇和早产死亡率、先天性梅毒发病率)。在这些指标基础上,增加了卫生和初级卫生保健支出,并采用聚焦产出的数据包络分析(不考虑支出减少情况)来计算2008年、2012年、2016年和2019年的效率。使用Malmquist指数来确定2008年至2019年期间可能的生产率提升。
四个被确定为由第三方管理的首府(圣保罗、里约热内卢、阿雷格里港和福塔莱萨)与直接公共管理相比,并未实现更高的效率,而且随着时间推移比较自身结果时也没有进步。在2019年的纵向分析中,只有由直接公共管理的首府在首府间比较中获得了最大相对效率指数。十二个采用直接公共管理的首府在所有年份都保持高效,而那些委托第三方管理的首府在初级卫生保健方面一直表现出明显的低效率,即在研究期间,初级卫生保健投资与所取得结果之间的关系低于高效首府所达到的水平。
我们没有发现采用第三方管理能提高效率的证据。应当指出,生产效率并不一定意味着卫生需求得到满足。