Suppr超能文献

巴西首都的初级保健效率与管理模式:2008 - 2019年

Efficiency of primary care in Brazilian capitals and management models: 2008-2019.

作者信息

Ramos André Luis Paes, Seta Marismary Horsth De, Battesini Marcelo

机构信息

Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca. Programa de Pós-graduação em Saúde Pública. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

Universidade Federal de Santa Maria. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Gestão de Organizações Públicas. Santa Maria, RS, Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Saude Publica. 2025 May 2;59:e6. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2025059006346. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze efficiency in primary health care in Brazilian state capitals in the period 2008-2019, considering the management model: direct public administration or administration assigned to third parties.

METHODS

This is an evaluative study with an analytical objective, using publicly available secondary data, analyzed cross-sectionally (2019) and longitudinally (2008, 2012, 2016, and 2019). Demographic and socioeconomic data and seven indicators related to primary health care were used to characterize the cities and their primary health care (primary care coverage, hospitalizations for primary care-sensitive conditions, tuberculosis cures, infant, maternal, and premature mortality due to chronic conditions, incidence of congenital syphilis). To these indicators were added health and primary health care expenditures and data envelopment analysis focused on outputs (without admitting a reduction in expenditures) to calculate efficiency in 2008, 2012, 2016, and 2019. The Malmquist index was used to identify possible productivity gains between 2008 and 2019.

RESULTS

Four capitals identified as being managed by third parties (São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Porto Alegre, and Fortaleza) did not achieve greater efficiency compared to direct public administration, nor did they evolve when comparing their own results over time. In 2019, and in the longitudinal approach, only capitals managed by direct public administration obtained the maximum relative efficiency index in the comparison between capitals. Twelve capitals with direct public administration remained efficient in all years, while those with third-party administration consistently showed weak inefficiency in primary health care, i.e. in the period studied, the relationship between investments in primary health care and results obtained is lower than that achieved by the efficient capitals.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence of efficiency gains with the adoption of third-party management. It should be noted that productive efficiency does not necessarily mean that health needs are met.

摘要

目的

分析2008 - 2019年巴西州首府初级卫生保健的效率,同时考虑管理模式:直接公共管理或委托第三方管理。

方法

这是一项具有分析目标的评估研究,使用公开可得的二手数据,进行横断面分析(2019年)和纵向分析(2008年、2012年、2016年和2019年)。利用人口和社会经济数据以及七个与初级卫生保健相关的指标来描述各城市及其初级卫生保健情况(初级保健覆盖率、初级保健敏感疾病住院率、结核病治愈率、慢性病导致的婴儿、孕产妇和早产死亡率、先天性梅毒发病率)。在这些指标基础上,增加了卫生和初级卫生保健支出,并采用聚焦产出的数据包络分析(不考虑支出减少情况)来计算2008年、2012年、2016年和2019年的效率。使用Malmquist指数来确定2008年至2019年期间可能的生产率提升。

结果

四个被确定为由第三方管理的首府(圣保罗、里约热内卢、阿雷格里港和福塔莱萨)与直接公共管理相比,并未实现更高的效率,而且随着时间推移比较自身结果时也没有进步。在2019年的纵向分析中,只有由直接公共管理的首府在首府间比较中获得了最大相对效率指数。十二个采用直接公共管理的首府在所有年份都保持高效,而那些委托第三方管理的首府在初级卫生保健方面一直表现出明显的低效率,即在研究期间,初级卫生保健投资与所取得结果之间的关系低于高效首府所达到的水平。

结论

我们没有发现采用第三方管理能提高效率的证据。应当指出,生产效率并不一定意味着卫生需求得到满足。

相似文献

1
Efficiency of primary care in Brazilian capitals and management models: 2008-2019.
Rev Saude Publica. 2025 May 2;59:e6. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2025059006346. eCollection 2025.
2
[Colon and rectal cancer mortality in Brazilian capitals, 1980-1997].
Arq Gastroenterol. 2005 Jan-Mar;42(1):63-70. doi: 10.1590/s0004-28032005000100014. Epub 2005 Jun 22.
3
[Primary health care and Social Organizations in capitals in the Southeast Region of Brazil: 2009 and 2014].
Cad Saude Publica. 2019;35(4):e00089118. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00089118. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
4
[Data envelopment analysis for evaluating public hospitals in Brazilian state capitals].
Rev Saude Publica. 2007 Jun;41(3):427-35. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102006005000023.
9
Analysis of financial resources for public health in Brazilian capitals: a time trend ecological study.
Cad Saude Publica. 2022 Jan 12;38(1):e00311620. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00311620. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of health-care privatisation on the quality of care.
Lancet Public Health. 2024 Mar;9(3):e199-e206. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00003-3.
3
Large-scale implementation of the Family Health Strategy in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: evidence and challenges.
Cien Saude Colet. 2021 Jun;26(6):2075-2082. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232021266.01012021. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
4
The economic crisis and primary health care in the SUS of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Cien Saude Colet. 2019 Dec;24(12):4593-4598. doi: 10.1590/1413-812320182412.25432019. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
5
Underfunding and federal budget of SUS: preliminary references for additional resource allocation.
Cien Saude Colet. 2019 Dec;24(12):4405-4415. doi: 10.1590/1413-812320182412.25892019. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
6
[Primary health care and Social Organizations in capitals in the Southeast Region of Brazil: 2009 and 2014].
Cad Saude Publica. 2019;35(4):e00089118. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00089118. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
8
[Social Healthcare Organizations: a phenomenological expression of healthcare privatization in Brazil].
Cad Saude Publica. 2018 Feb 5;34(1):e00194916. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00194916.
9
Evaluation of the performance of actions and outcomes in primary health care.
Rev Saude Publica. 2017;51:86. doi: 10.11606/S1518-8787.2017051006831. Epub 2017 Sep 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验