Runyon Maggie C, Trout Kimberly K, Copel Linda Carman, Moriarty Helene
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2025;50(5):259-268. doi: 10.1097/NMC.0000000000001118. Epub 2025 Aug 13.
This integrative review used Whittemore and Knafl's (2005) framework to critique the available quantitative evidence examining multiple types, prevalence, and impact of psychological trauma in labor and delivery nurses. This review synthesizes the quantitative evidence on multiple types of trauma in this population.
Inclusion criteria were quantitative and mixed-methods studies of labor and delivery nurses examining types of trauma as defined by Foli's Middle-Range Theory of Nurses' Psychological Trauma. Studies on patient trauma from nursing care were excluded. CINAHL, Scopus, Medline, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were searched for studies electronically available through April 8, 2024. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools facilitated quality and bias assessments. A conceptual model based on Foli's theory contextualizes the findings.
Nine studies (five cross-sectional descriptive, one longitudinal, and three mixed-methods) are included in this review. Across all studies, unique aspects of the labor and birth nurse role were found to contribute to trauma, including exposure to perinatal death and fetal demise, high rates of patient trauma, an increasingly medicalized birth environment, and emotional burnout. Labor and birth nurses experienced psychosomatic symptoms, negative effects on their relationships and quality of life, and increased rates of attrition, although nurses also identified specific system supports to decrease these effects.
Limited research exists on the types of and impact of trauma experienced by labor and delivery nurses. This integrative review aims to address this gap in knowledge, while also suggesting implications for future research and policy. There is emerging evidence that post-traumatic growth is possible in this population with system support, yet many nurses are unaware of or have inadequate access to such resources. More research is needed to fully understand the magnitude of this population's psychological trauma and provide effective support strategies.
本整合性综述采用了惠特莫尔和克纳夫(2005年)的框架,对现有的定量证据进行批判性分析,这些证据考察了分娩护士心理创伤的多种类型、发生率及其影响。本综述综合了该人群多种创伤类型的定量证据。
纳入标准为关于分娩护士的定量和混合方法研究,这些研究考察了福利的护士心理创伤中程理论所定义的创伤类型。排除关于护理过程中患者创伤的研究。通过电子方式检索CINAHL、Scopus、Medline、PubMed和科学网数据库,检索截至2024年4月8日可获取的研究。乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的批判性评价工具有助于进行质量和偏倚评估。基于福利理论的概念模型将研究结果置于情境中。
本综述纳入了9项研究(5项横断面描述性研究、1项纵向研究和3项混合方法研究)。在所有研究中,发现分娩护士角色的独特方面会导致创伤,包括接触围产期死亡和胎儿死亡、患者创伤发生率高、分娩环境日益医学化以及情绪倦怠。分娩护士出现了身心症状,对其人际关系和生活质量产生了负面影响,离职率也有所上升,不过护士们也确定了具体的系统支持措施来减轻这些影响。
关于分娩护士所经历创伤的类型及其影响的研究有限。本整合性综述旨在填补这一知识空白,同时也为未来的研究和政策提出启示。有新证据表明,在系统支持下,这一人群有可能实现创伤后成长,但许多护士并不知晓此类资源或无法充分获取。需要更多研究来全面了解该人群心理创伤的严重程度,并提供有效的支持策略。