Hussain Sarah, Lehmann Harold, Buresh Megan E, Niessen Timothy M, Fingerhood Michael I, Ahmed Nazeer, Cavallio Kelly, Maslen Andrew, Knight Amy M
Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Department of Pharmacy, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
Appl Clin Inform. 2025 Mar;16(2):393-401. doi: 10.1055/a-2508-7086. Epub 2025 May 7.
Not all patients at risk for opioid overdose are prescribed naloxone when discharged from the emergency department or hospital. Clinical decision support (CDS) can be used to promote clinical best practices, such as naloxone prescribing; however, it may be ignored due to knowledge deficiencies or alert fatigue.
Assess the effect of academic detailing on responses to a CDS alert recommending a naloxone prescription for patients at risk of opioid overdose.
A pre/postquality improvement study of 2,161 active providers at a 400-bed academic medical center. The first intervention was an educational email to all providers. The second intervention was individual emails to 150 providers who infrequently ordered naloxone in response to the alert. The main outcome measure was prescription-to-alert ratios, defined as the number of naloxone prescriptions signed in response to the alert divided by the number of times the alert fired.
The first academic detailing intervention resulted in a prescription-to-alert ratio increase from 32.6 to 51.7%, a 19.1% absolute increase when comparing the approximately 8 months before and after the email was sent (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16.3-21.9%, < 0.001). The second intervention resulted in an increased prescription-to-alert ratio from 9.3 to 50.6%, an absolute increase of 41.3% when comparing the nearly 8 months before and after the emails were sent (95% CI: 36.9-45.7%, < 0.001). Improvements were seen across all services and all provider roles, particularly for advanced practice providers, and were sustained for 8 months.
Academic detailing can be used to augment responses to CDS for patients with opioid dependence. Further study is needed to see if this effect can be replicated with CDS for other high priority conditions, and whether academic detailing with one alert might improve responses to other alerts as well, potentially decreasing alert fatigue.
并非所有有阿片类药物过量风险的患者在从急诊科或医院出院时都会被开具纳洛酮。临床决策支持(CDS)可用于推广临床最佳实践,如开具纳洛酮处方;然而,由于知识不足或警报疲劳,它可能会被忽视。
评估学术指导对CDS警报响应的影响,该警报建议为有阿片类药物过量风险的患者开具纳洛酮处方。
对一家拥有400张床位的学术医疗中心的2161名在职医护人员进行前后质量改进研究。第一次干预是向所有医护人员发送一封教育邮件。第二次干预是向150名很少根据警报开具纳洛酮的医护人员发送个性化邮件。主要结局指标是处方与警报比率,定义为因警报而开具的纳洛酮处方数量除以警报触发次数。
第一次学术指导干预使处方与警报比率从32.6%提高到51.7%,在发送邮件前后约8个月的比较中,绝对提高了19.1%(95%置信区间[CI]:16.3 - 21.9%,P < 0.001)。第二次干预使处方与警报比率从9.3%提高到50.6%,在发送邮件前后近8个月的比较中,绝对提高了41.3%(95% CI:36.9 - 45.7%,P < 0.001)。所有科室和所有医护人员角色均有改善,尤其是高级执业医护人员,且持续了8个月。
学术指导可用于增强对阿片类药物依赖患者的CDS响应。需要进一步研究,以确定这种效果是否能在针对其他高优先级病症的CDS中得到复制,以及针对一个警报的学术指导是否也能改善对其他警报的响应,从而潜在地减少警报疲劳。