• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生态高效农业中的性别差异。

Gender-based differences in eco-efficient farming.

作者信息

Fertő Imre, Baráth Lajos, Bojnec Štefan

机构信息

HUN-REN Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Tóth K. u. 4, Budapest, 1112, Hungary.

Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8, Budapest, 1097, Hungary.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 May 7;15(1):15895. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00584-4.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-00584-4
PMID:40335544
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12059167/
Abstract

This study investigates gender-based differences in eco-efficiency among Hungarian field crop farms, using data from the Farm Accountancy Data Network between 2015 and 2020. Applying Data Envelopment Analysis and Blinder-Oaxaca decompositions, we reveal a consistent eco-efficiency advantage for women-headed farms, particularly at mid-quantiles of eco-efficiency distribution. This advantage is largely attributed to women's ability to optimize resource use effectively, though unexplained factors also contribute, suggesting potential differences in management practices. Results highlight that women-led farms often adopt eco-efficient practices that may contribute to sustainability goals. These findings highlight the need for policies that support women farmers' access to resources, knowledge, and innovation in eco-friendly farming practices, helping to enhance sustainability in agricultural production. Encouraging women participation in sustainable agricultural entrepreneurship could play a critical role in driving eco-efficiency across the crop sector, ultimately contributing to environmental resilience and rural socio-economic development.

摘要

本研究利用2015年至2020年农场会计数据网络的数据,调查了匈牙利大田作物农场生态效率的性别差异。通过应用数据包络分析和布林德-奥萨卡分解,我们发现女性主导的农场在生态效率方面具有持续优势,尤其是在生态效率分布的中位数区间。这一优势很大程度上归因于女性有效优化资源利用的能力,不过未解释的因素也有影响,这表明管理实践可能存在差异。结果表明,女性主导的农场通常采用有助于实现可持续发展目标的生态高效做法。这些发现凸显了制定政策的必要性,这些政策应支持女农民获取资源、知识以及采用生态友好型耕作方式的创新方法,从而有助于提高农业生产的可持续性。鼓励女性参与可持续农业创业,对于推动整个作物部门的生态效率可能发挥关键作用,最终有助于增强环境适应力和农村社会经济发展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c48a/12059167/bc5349151677/41598_2025_584_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c48a/12059167/a071735dfc3a/41598_2025_584_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c48a/12059167/bc5349151677/41598_2025_584_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c48a/12059167/a071735dfc3a/41598_2025_584_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c48a/12059167/bc5349151677/41598_2025_584_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Gender-based differences in eco-efficient farming.生态高效农业中的性别差异。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 7;15(1):15895. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00584-4.
2
Farm to Fork strategy and restrictions on the use of chemical inputs: Impacts on the various types of farming and territories of Italy.从农场到餐桌战略和化学投入物使用限制:对意大利各种类型农业和地区的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Mar 1;810:152259. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152259. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
3
Mixed crop-livestock systems: an economic and environmental-friendly way of farming?种养结合系统:一种经济环保的农业方式?
Animal. 2012 Oct;6(10):1722-30. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112000675. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
4
Enhancing environmental sustainability in transferred farmlands through rural e-commerce: insights from China.通过农村电子商务提高转移耕地的环境可持续性:来自中国的见解。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Apr;31(17):25388-25405. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-32699-y. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
5
Optimization of coupling crop and livestock production system's eco-efficiency in northern China based on a life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis method.基于生命周期评估和数据包络分析方法的中国北方农牧耦合生产系统生态效率优化
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Apr 15;921:170852. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170852. Epub 2024 Feb 10.
6
Application of Precision Agriculture Technologies for Sustainable Crop Production and Environmental Sustainability: A Systematic Review.精准农业技术在可持续作物生产和环境可持续性中的应用:系统评价。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2024 Oct 9;2024:2126734. doi: 10.1155/2024/2126734. eCollection 2024.
7
Assessing farming eco-efficiency: a Data Envelopment Analysis approach.评估农业生态效率:数据包络分析方法。
J Environ Manage. 2011 Apr;92(4):1154-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.025. Epub 2010 Dec 28.
8
Relevance of farm-scale indicators and tools for farmers to assess sustainability of their mixed crop-ruminant livestock systems.农场规模指标和工具对农民评估其混合作物-反刍动物牲畜系统可持续性的相关性。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Nov 10;950:175218. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175218. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
9
Adoption of Sustainable Agriculture Practices among Farmers in Kentucky, USA.美国肯塔基州农民对可持续农业实践的采用。
Environ Manage. 2018 Dec;62(6):1060-1072. doi: 10.1007/s00267-018-1109-3. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
10
How eco-efficient are crop farms in the Southern Amazon region? Insights from combining agent-based simulations with robust order-m eco-efficiency estimation.南方亚马逊地区的农作物农场的生态效率有多高?基于代理的模拟与稳健的序贯生态效率评估相结合的观点。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 May 1;819:153072. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153072. Epub 2022 Jan 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Empowering women in sustainable agriculture.赋权妇女参与可持续农业。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 26;14(1):7110. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57933-y.
2
Agri-environmental policies from 1960 to 2022.1960年至2022年的农业环境政策。
Nat Food. 2024 Apr;5(4):323-331. doi: 10.1038/s43016-024-00945-8. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
3
Influence of university agricultural technology extension on efficient and sustainable agriculture.大学农业技术推广对高效可持续农业的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 28;14(1):4874. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55641-1.
4
Adapting crop production to climate change and air pollution at different scales.在不同尺度上使作物生产适应气候变化和空气污染。
Nat Food. 2023 Oct;4(10):854-865. doi: 10.1038/s43016-023-00858-y. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
5
Does participation in agri-environmental schemes increase eco-efficiency?参与农业环境计划是否能提高生态效率?
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jan 1;906:167518. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167518. Epub 2023 Oct 7.
6
EU-27 ecological footprint was primarily driven by food consumption and exceeded regional biocapacity from 2004 to 2014.2004 年至 2014 年期间,欧盟 27 国的生态足迹主要受食品消费驱动,超过了区域生物承载力。
Nat Food. 2023 Sep;4(9):810-822. doi: 10.1038/s43016-023-00843-5. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
7
Changes in global food consumption increase GHG emissions despite efficiency gains along global supply chains.尽管全球供应链的效率有所提高,但全球粮食消费的变化仍导致温室气体排放增加。
Nat Food. 2023 Jun;4(6):483-495. doi: 10.1038/s43016-023-00768-z. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
8
Gender-based violence in food systems.基于性别的粮食系统暴力。
Nat Food. 2023 Jun;4(6):472-475. doi: 10.1038/s43016-023-00777-y. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
9
Countries influence the trade-off between crop yields and nitrogen pollution.各国影响着作物产量与氮污染之间的权衡。
Nat Food. 2020 Nov;1(11):713-719. doi: 10.1038/s43016-020-00185-6. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
10
Consolidation of agricultural land can contribute to agricultural sustainability in China.土地整治有利于中国农业的可持续发展。
Nat Food. 2021 Dec;2(12):1014-1022. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00415-5. Epub 2021 Dec 16.