Jakobsen Sarah, Tølbøll Katrine B, Thastum Mikael, Lomholt Johanne J
Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
TrygFonden's Centre for Child Research, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2025 May 8. doi: 10.1007/s10578-025-01847-x.
This pre-registered (#CRD42024509947) systematic review synthesized evidence on cognitive behavioral interventions (CBTs) for youths with school attendance problems (SAPs). The PsycINFO, PubMed, ERIC, and Scopus databases were searched through 1985-2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, and open trials (OTs) evaluating SAP-focused CBT. Data were synthesized narratively and through meta-analysis. Four RCTs and eleven OTs met eligibility criteria, including 932 youths. Meta-analyses revealed small to large uncontrolled pre- to post-intervention effects for school attendance (g = 1.02), anxiety (g = - 0.57), depression (g = - 0.66), and behavioral problems (g = - 0.40), which were maintained at follow-up. When compared to a control, CBT had a medium effect on school attendance (g = 0.44) but non-significant effects on anxiety (g = - 0.09) and depression (g = - 0.14). While the results hold promise for SAP-focused CBTs, evidence was limited by study heterogeneity, bias risks, methodological limitations, and inconsistent outcome measures, highlighting the needed for further RCTs.
这项预先注册(#CRD42024509947)的系统评价综合了关于针对有上学出勤问题(SAP)的青少年的认知行为干预(CBT)的证据。通过检索1985年至2024年的PsycINFO、PubMed、ERIC和Scopus数据库,查找评估以SAP为重点的CBT的随机对照试验(RCT)、非随机对照试验和开放试验(OT)。数据通过叙述性综合和荟萃分析进行综合。四项RCT和十一项OT符合纳入标准,包括932名青少年。荟萃分析显示,干预前到干预后在上学出勤(g = 1.02)、焦虑(g = -0.57)、抑郁(g = -0.66)和行为问题(g = -0.40)方面有小到中等程度的未控制效应,这些效应在随访时得以维持。与对照组相比,CBT对上学出勤有中等效应(g = 0.44),但对焦虑(g = -0.09)和抑郁(g = -0.14)的效应不显著。虽然结果显示以SAP为重点的CBT有前景,但证据受到研究异质性、偏倚风险、方法学局限性和不一致的结局测量的限制,突出了进一步进行RCT的必要性。