• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对上学出勤问题的认知行为干预:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。

Cognitive Behavioral Interventions for School Attendance Problems: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Jakobsen Sarah, Tølbøll Katrine B, Thastum Mikael, Lomholt Johanne J

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

TrygFonden's Centre for Child Research, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2025 May 8. doi: 10.1007/s10578-025-01847-x.

DOI:10.1007/s10578-025-01847-x
PMID:40335864
Abstract

This pre-registered (#CRD42024509947) systematic review synthesized evidence on cognitive behavioral interventions (CBTs) for youths with school attendance problems (SAPs). The PsycINFO, PubMed, ERIC, and Scopus databases were searched through 1985-2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, and open trials (OTs) evaluating SAP-focused CBT. Data were synthesized narratively and through meta-analysis. Four RCTs and eleven OTs met eligibility criteria, including 932 youths. Meta-analyses revealed small to large uncontrolled pre- to post-intervention effects for school attendance (g = 1.02), anxiety (g = - 0.57), depression (g = - 0.66), and behavioral problems (g = - 0.40), which were maintained at follow-up. When compared to a control, CBT had a medium effect on school attendance (g = 0.44) but non-significant effects on anxiety (g = - 0.09) and depression (g = - 0.14). While the results hold promise for SAP-focused CBTs, evidence was limited by study heterogeneity, bias risks, methodological limitations, and inconsistent outcome measures, highlighting the needed for further RCTs.

摘要

这项预先注册(#CRD42024509947)的系统评价综合了关于针对有上学出勤问题(SAP)的青少年的认知行为干预(CBT)的证据。通过检索1985年至2024年的PsycINFO、PubMed、ERIC和Scopus数据库,查找评估以SAP为重点的CBT的随机对照试验(RCT)、非随机对照试验和开放试验(OT)。数据通过叙述性综合和荟萃分析进行综合。四项RCT和十一项OT符合纳入标准,包括932名青少年。荟萃分析显示,干预前到干预后在上学出勤(g = 1.02)、焦虑(g = -0.57)、抑郁(g = -0.66)和行为问题(g = -0.40)方面有小到中等程度的未控制效应,这些效应在随访时得以维持。与对照组相比,CBT对上学出勤有中等效应(g = 0.44),但对焦虑(g = -0.09)和抑郁(g = -0.14)的效应不显著。虽然结果显示以SAP为重点的CBT有前景,但证据受到研究异质性、偏倚风险、方法学局限性和不一致的结局测量的限制,突出了进一步进行RCT的必要性。

相似文献

1
Cognitive Behavioral Interventions for School Attendance Problems: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.针对上学出勤问题的认知行为干预:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2025 May 8. doi: 10.1007/s10578-025-01847-x.
2
The Effectiveness of Modular Transdiagnostic Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Versus Treatment as Usual for Youths Displaying School Attendance Problems: A Randomized Controlled Trial.《针对存在上学问题的青少年,采用模块化跨诊断认知行为疗法与常规治疗的效果比较:一项随机对照试验》
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2024 Sep;52(9):1397-1412. doi: 10.1007/s10802-024-01196-8. Epub 2024 May 13.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Mobile apps to reduce depressive symptoms and alcohol use in youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis: A systematic review.减少青少年抑郁症状和酒精使用的移动应用程序:一项系统评价和荟萃分析:一项系统评价。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 26;20(2):e1398. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1398. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.
6
A comparison of the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural interventions based on delivery features for elevated symptoms of depression in adolescents: A systematic review.基于交付特征的认知行为干预对青少年抑郁症状加重的有效性比较:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 7;20(1):e1376. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1376. eCollection 2024 Mar.
7
Feasibility Study of Back2School, a Modular Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for Youth With School Attendance Problems.针对存在上学出勤问题的青少年的模块化认知行为干预“重返校园”的可行性研究。
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 6;11:586. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00586. eCollection 2020.
8
Psychological interventions for co-occurring depression and substance use disorders.针对并发抑郁症和物质使用障碍的心理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 26;2019(11):CD009501. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009501.pub2.
9
Psychological interventions for improving adherence to inhaled therapies in people with cystic fibrosis.心理干预对改善囊性纤维化患者吸入治疗依从性的作用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 29;3(3):CD013766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013766.pub2.
10
Psychological Interventions for Pediatric Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.儿童创伤后应激障碍的心理干预:系统评价与网状Meta分析
JAMA Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 1;82(2):130-141. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.3908.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effectiveness of Modular Transdiagnostic Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Versus Treatment as Usual for Youths Displaying School Attendance Problems: A Randomized Controlled Trial.《针对存在上学问题的青少年,采用模块化跨诊断认知行为疗法与常规治疗的效果比较:一项随机对照试验》
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2024 Sep;52(9):1397-1412. doi: 10.1007/s10802-024-01196-8. Epub 2024 May 13.
2
Effectiveness of Usual-Care Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adolescents with School Absenteeism.常规认知行为疗法对青少年逃学的疗效。
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2022 Nov;50(6):436-446. doi: 10.1024/1422-4917/a000883. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
3
Modifiable Parent Factors Associated with Child and Adolescent School Refusal: A Systematic Review.
可改变的父母因素与儿童和青少年学校拒绝:系统评价。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2023 Oct;54(5):1459-1475. doi: 10.1007/s10578-022-01358-z. Epub 2022 Apr 10.
4
Outcome of a Multi-modal CBT-based Treatment Program for Chronic School Refusal.基于多模式认知行为疗法的慢性学校拒绝治疗方案的结果
Glob Pediatr Health. 2021 Mar 30;8:2333794X211002952. doi: 10.1177/2333794X211002952. eCollection 2021.
5
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
6
A Scoping Review of Constructs Measured Following Intervention for School Refusal: Are We Measuring Up?对学校拒绝行为干预后所测量结构的范围综述:我们是否达标?
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 20;11:1744. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01744. eCollection 2020.
7
Review: The association between anxiety and poor attendance at school - a systematic review.综述:焦虑与学校出勤率低之间的关联——一项系统综述。
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2019 Sep;24(3):205-216. doi: 10.1111/camh.12322. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
8
A Multidimensional, Multi-tiered System of Supports Model to Promote School Attendance and Address School Absenteeism.促进就学和解决逃学问题的多维多层支持系统模式。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2020 Sep;23(3):316-337. doi: 10.1007/s10567-020-00317-1.
9
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
10
The association between child and adolescent depression and poor attendance at school: A systematic review and meta-analysis.儿童和青少年抑郁与学业不良之间的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Feb 15;245:928-938. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.11.055. Epub 2018 Nov 7.