Jeremy Jill, Hinitt Joanne, Spandagou Ilektra
Sydney School of Education and Social Work, Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.
Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Br J Occup Ther. 2025 May;88(5):302-313. doi: 10.1177/03080226241295601. Epub 2025 Feb 23.
Globally occupational therapists are collaborating with teachers to support the inclusion of students with disabilities in mainstream schools. To begin to understand how collaboration promotes inclusion, this study aimed to measure occupational therapists and teachers perceived collaborative practice.
A quantitative cross-sectional analysis of occupational therapists and teachers in mainstream primary schools in three Australian states was conducted via an anonymous online survey. Eligible participants were recruited via self-selection and snowballing, resulting in a nonprobability sample of 108 occupational therapists and 33 primary teachers. The Teacher - Therapist Collaboration Index, an instrument based on an existing conceptual framework and associated tool was developed to measure perceived collaborative practice.
Occupational therapist and teacher profiles were similar. Both professions report above average collaborative practice, although teachers rated themselves more collaborative on two components. Ratings did not significantly differ by profession, demographic, or background. Personal, professional and systems influences positively correlated with collaboration ratings, with systems having the strongest relationship.
Systems changes may be necessary to improve collaboration. Therapists could use the framework and measurement instrument as tools to plan, execute and evaluate their collaborative practice.
在全球范围内,职业治疗师正与教师合作,以支持残疾学生融入主流学校。为了开始理解合作如何促进融合,本研究旨在衡量职业治疗师和教师所感知的合作实践。
通过一项匿名在线调查,对澳大利亚三个州主流小学的职业治疗师和教师进行了定量横断面分析。符合条件的参与者通过自我选择和滚雪球抽样的方式招募,最终得到了一个由108名职业治疗师和33名小学教师组成的非概率样本。基于现有的概念框架和相关工具开发了教师 - 治疗师合作指数,以衡量所感知的合作实践。
职业治疗师和教师的概况相似。两个职业都报告了高于平均水平的合作实践,尽管教师在两个方面给自己的合作评分更高。评分在职业、人口统计学或背景方面没有显著差异。个人、专业和系统影响与合作评分呈正相关,其中系统的关系最为密切。
可能需要进行系统变革以改善合作。治疗师可以使用该框架和测量工具作为规划、执行和评估其合作实践的工具。