Suppr超能文献

跨专业协作能力达成调查(ICCAS)的验证

Validation of the interprofessional collaborative competency attainment survey (ICCAS).

作者信息

Archibald Douglas, Trumpower David, MacDonald Colla J

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, C.T. Lamont Centre for Research in Primary Care, University of Ottawa , Ottawa, Ontario , Canada and.

出版信息

J Interprof Care. 2014 Nov;28(6):553-8. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2014.917407. Epub 2014 May 14.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to obtain evidence regarding the validity and reliability of an instrument to measure the self-reported competencies of interprofessional care in interprofessional education programs. Five hundred and eighty-four students and clinicians in Canada and New Zealand who were registered in 15 interprofessional education undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing professional development programs completed the Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS) using a retrospective pre-test/post-test design. Factor analyses showed the presence of two factors in the pre-program items and one factor in the post-program items. Tests conducted provided evidence in support of the validity and reliability of the ICCAS as a self-assessment instrument for interprofessional collaborative practice. Internal consistency was high for items loading on factor 1 (α = 0.96) and factor 2 (α = 0.94) in the pre-program assessment and for the items in the post-program assessment (α = 0.98). The transition from a two factor solution to a single factor structure suggests interventions influence learners' understanding of interprofessional care by promoting the recognition of the high degree of interrelation among interprofessional care competencies. Scores on the ICCAS are reliable and predict meaningful outcomes with regard to attitudes toward interprofessional competency attainment.

摘要

本研究的目的是获取关于一种工具有效性和可靠性的证据,该工具用于测量跨专业教育项目中自我报告的跨专业护理能力。加拿大和新西兰的584名学生及临床医生,他们注册于15个跨专业教育本科、研究生及继续专业发展项目,采用回顾性前测/后测设计完成了跨专业协作能力达成调查(ICCAS)。因子分析表明,项目前的条目存在两个因子,项目后的条目存在一个因子。所进行的测试为支持ICCAS作为跨专业协作实践自我评估工具的有效性和可靠性提供了证据。在项目前评估中,加载于因子1(α = 0.96)和因子2(α = 0.94)的条目以及项目后评估中的条目内部一致性较高(α = 0.98)。从双因子解决方案到单因子结构的转变表明,干预措施通过促进对跨专业护理能力之间高度相关性的认识来影响学习者对跨专业护理的理解。ICCAS的分数是可靠的,并且能够预测关于跨专业能力达成态度方面的有意义结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验