Suppr超能文献

没有证据表明在自闭症谱系障碍儿童中,贝利-布克滕尼卡视觉-运动整合发育测试存在最小临床重要差异。

No evidence of a minimal clinically important difference for the Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration in children with autism spectrum disorder.

作者信息

Ohl Alisha, Schelly David

机构信息

Occupational Therapy Department, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY, USA.

出版信息

Br J Occup Ther. 2022 Jul;85(7):549-556. doi: 10.1177/03080226211057834. Epub 2021 Dec 12.

Abstract

The Beery Visual-Motor Integration (VMI) battery of tests are some of the most commonly used assessments in pediatric occupational therapy, often used to measure change over time. However, the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) has not been estimated for interpreting change scores. We estimated the MCID for the Beery VMI battery of tests in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Four occupational therapists collected data in a public elementary school on 64 children with ASD. The Beery VMI battery was administered to children with ASD twice, approximately 11 months apart. To estimate MCID values, Beery VMI battery scores were anchored to 15-point Likert questions measuring occupational therapists' ratings of functional change over three domains: fine motor skills, handwriting, and activities of daily living (ADLs). Using this anchor-based method, we were unable to estimate MCID values for the Beery VMI battery. Children's Beery VMI battery scores did not change significantly over the course of the school year, and there was only one weak correlation between VMI battery change scores and therapists' ratings of change. The inability to estimate Beery VMI battery MCID values for children with ASD adds further support for research cautioning the use of the Beery VMI as an outcome measure.

摘要

贝利视觉运动整合(VMI)测试组合是儿科职业治疗中最常用的评估方法之一,常用于衡量随时间的变化。然而,尚未估计出用于解释变化分数的最小临床重要差异(MCID)。我们估计了自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童贝利VMI测试组合的MCID。四名职业治疗师在一所公立小学收集了64名ASD儿童的数据。对ASD儿童进行了两次贝利VMI测试组合,两次测试间隔约11个月。为了估计MCID值,将贝利VMI测试组合的分数与15点李克特量表问题挂钩,这些问题衡量职业治疗师对三个领域功能变化的评分:精细运动技能、书写和日常生活活动(ADL)。使用这种基于锚定的方法,我们无法估计贝利VMI测试组合的MCID值。在本学年期间,儿童的贝利VMI测试组合分数没有显著变化,并且VMI测试组合变化分数与治疗师的变化评分之间只有一个弱相关性。无法估计ASD儿童贝利VMI测试组合的MCID值,这进一步支持了告诫不要将贝利VMI用作结果指标的研究。

相似文献

3
Beery VMI performance in autism spectrum disorder.贝利视觉运动整合能力测试在自闭症谱系障碍中的表现
Child Neuropsychol. 2016;22(7):795-817. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2015.1056131. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
6

本文引用的文献

2
6
Treatment patterns in children with autism in the United States.美国自闭症儿童的治疗模式。
Autism Res. 2019 Mar;12(3):517-526. doi: 10.1002/aur.2070. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
7
Philosophical Base of Occupational Therapy.职业治疗的哲学基础。
Am J Occup Ther. 2017 Nov/Dec;71(Supplement_2):7112410045P1. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2017.716S06.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验