Green Ryan R, Bigler Erin D, Froehlich Alyson, Prigge Molly B D, Zielinski Brandon A, Travers Brittany G, Anderson Jeffrey S, Alexander Andrew, Lange Nicholas, Lainhart Janet E
Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, 1001 SWKT, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
Neuroscience Center, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.
J Pediatr Neuropsychol. 2019 Sep;5(3):77-84. doi: 10.1007/s40817-019-00069-z. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
Although diminished proficiency on tasks that require visual-motor integration (VMI) has been reported in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), very few studies have examined the association between VMI performance and neuroanatomical regions of interest (ROI) involved in motor and perceptual functioning. To address these issues, the current study included an all-male sample of 41 ASD (ages 3-23 years) and 27 typically developing (TD) participants (ages 5-26 years) who completed the Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration (Beery VMI) as part of a comprehensive neuropsychological battery. All participants underwent 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with image quantification (FreeSurfer software v5.3). The groups were statistically matched on age, handedness, and intracranial volume (ICV). ASD participants performed significantly lower on VMI and IQ measures compared with the TD group. VMI performance was significantly correlated with FSIQ and PIQ in the TD group only. No pre-defined neuroanatomical ROIs were significantly different between groups. Significant correlations were observed in the TD group between VMI and total precentral gyrus gray matter volume ( = .51, = .006) and total frontal lobe gray matter volume ( = .46, = .017). There were no significant ROI correlations with Beery VMI performance in ASD participants. At the group level, despite ASD participants exhibiting reduced visuomotor abilities, no systematic relation with motor or sensory-perceptual ROIs was observed. In the TD group, results were consistent with the putative role of the precentral gyrus in motor control along with frontal involvement in planning, organization, and execution monitoring, all essential for VMI performance. Given that similar associations between VMI and ROIs were not observed in those with ASD, neurodevelopment in ASD group participants may not follow homogenous patterns making correlations in these brain regions unlikely to be observed.
尽管有报告称,患有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的个体在需要视觉运动整合(VMI)的任务上表现出能力下降,但很少有研究探讨VMI表现与参与运动和感知功能的神经解剖学感兴趣区域(ROI)之间的关联。为了解决这些问题,本研究纳入了41名ASD男性样本(年龄3 - 23岁)和27名发育正常(TD)的参与者(年龄5 - 26岁),他们完成了作为综合神经心理测试一部分的贝利 - 布克滕尼卡视觉运动整合发育测试(贝利VMI)。所有参与者均接受了3.0T磁共振成像(MRI)及图像量化(FreeSurfer软件v5.3)。两组在年龄、利手和颅内体积(ICV)方面进行了统计学匹配。与TD组相比,ASD参与者在VMI和智商测量方面的表现显著更低。仅在TD组中,VMI表现与FSIQ和PIQ显著相关。两组之间预先定义的神经解剖学ROI没有显著差异。在TD组中观察到VMI与中央前回总灰质体积(r = 0.51,p = 0.006)和额叶总灰质体积(r = 0.46,p = 0.017)之间存在显著相关性。在ASD参与者中,没有观察到ROI与贝利VMI表现之间的显著相关性。在组水平上,尽管ASD参与者表现出视觉运动能力下降,但未观察到与运动或感觉 - 感知ROI的系统关系。在TD组中,结果与中央前回在运动控制中的假定作用一致,同时额叶参与计划、组织和执行监测,这些对于VMI表现都是必不可少的。鉴于在ASD患者中未观察到VMI与ROI之间的类似关联,ASD组参与者的神经发育可能不遵循同质模式,因此在这些脑区不太可能观察到相关性。