Suppr超能文献

对影响爱尔兰职业治疗师研究参与度的定性调查。

A qualitative investigation of influences on occupational therapists' research involvement in Ireland.

作者信息

Dwyer Christopher P, Keane Alexandra, Casey Dympna, Rogers Fionnuala M, Hynes Sinéad M

机构信息

Technological University of the Shannon: Midlands, Athlone Institute of Technology, Athlone, Ireland.

School of Health Sciences, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.

出版信息

Br J Occup Ther. 2023 Apr;86(4):320-330. doi: 10.1177/03080226221136812. Epub 2022 Dec 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To fulfil the desire for evidence-based practice, there is impetus for occupational therapy (OT) to make research a priority and to encourage research engagement.

PURPOSE

This study's aim was to explore occupational therapists' reasons for and for not getting involved in research and to determine potential barriers and enablers to engaging in research.

METHODS

Three focus groups were conducted with five participants each. Data were thematically analysed.

FINDINGS

Occupational therapists' reasons for expressing interest in getting involved in research were having an interest in the condition and/or the symptoms being studied; promoting client support and service development; and 'upskilling'. Three themes emerged from the thematic analysis: (1) motivation to get involved in research can be influenced; (2) 'firefighting': barriers and organisational culture; and (3) The nature of research needs consideration from an occupational therapist perspective.

IMPLICATIONS

Findings suggest that though occupational therapists are able to get involved in research, it remains that there are difficulties in doing so (e.g., organisational culture); and such difficulties may outweigh both reasons and enablers to such involvement. Reasons for expressing interest, enablers, barriers and the relationships among them warrant further investigation and consideration with respect to involving occupational therapists in research.

摘要

背景

为了满足循证实践的需求,职业治疗(OT)领域有动力将研究作为优先事项并鼓励参与研究。

目的

本研究的目的是探讨职业治疗师参与和不参与研究的原因,并确定参与研究的潜在障碍和促进因素。

方法

进行了三个焦点小组,每个小组有五名参与者。对数据进行了主题分析。

结果

职业治疗师表示有兴趣参与研究的原因包括对所研究的病症和/或症状感兴趣;促进客户支持和服务发展;以及“提升技能”。主题分析产生了三个主题:(1)参与研究的动机可能受到影响;(2)“救火”:障碍和组织文化;(3)从职业治疗师的角度需要考虑研究的性质。

启示

研究结果表明,尽管职业治疗师能够参与研究,但这样做仍然存在困难(例如组织文化);而且这些困难可能超过参与研究的理由和促进因素。就职业治疗师参与研究而言,表达兴趣的原因、促进因素、障碍以及它们之间的关系值得进一步调查和考虑。

相似文献

9
Wheelchair-mounted robotic arms: a survey of occupational therapists' practices and perspectives.轮椅式机械臂:职业治疗师实践与观点的调查。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Nov;18(8):1421-1430. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2021.2017030. Epub 2021 Dec 22.

本文引用的文献

3
Caribbean public health: achievements and future challenges.
Lancet Public Health. 2019 Jul;4(7):e324. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30102-1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验