• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小学阶段的书写:比较标准化测试并评估书写运动参数的影响。

Handwriting in primary school: comparing standardized tests and evaluating impact of grapho-motor parameters.

作者信息

Sparaci Laura, Fantasia Valentina, Bonsignori Chiara, Provenzale Cecilia, Formica Domenico, Taffoni Fabrizio

机构信息

Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies (ISTC), National Research Council (CNR) of Italy, Via Nomentana 56, 00161 Rome, Italy.

Department of Philosophy and Cognitive Science, Faculties of the Humanities and Theology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Read Writ. 2025;38(5):1409-1434. doi: 10.1007/s11145-024-10562-3. Epub 2024 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1007/s11145-024-10562-3
PMID:40337598
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12052790/
Abstract

A growing number of primary school students experience difficulties with grapho-motor skills involved in handwriting, which impact both form and content of their texts. Therefore, it is important to assess and monitor handwriting skills in primary school via standardized tests and detect specific grapho-motor parameters (GMPs) which impact handwriting legibility. Multiple standardized tools are available to assess grapho-motor skills in primary school, yet little is known on between-test agreement, on impact of specific GMPs on children's overall performance and on which GMPs may be specifically hard to tackle for children that are starting to consolidate their handwriting skills. These data would be extremely relevant for clinicians, therapists and educators, who have to choose among different assessment tools as well as design tailored intervention strategies to reach adequate performance on different GMPs in cases of poor handwriting. To gain better understanding of currently available standardized tools, we compared overall performance of 39 Italian primary school children (19 second graders and 20 third graders) experiencing difficulties with handwriting on three standardized tests for grapho-motor skills assessment and explored the impact of individual GMPs on child performance. Results showed some agreement between tests considering all children in our sample, but no agreement in second grade and only limited agreement in third grade. Data also allowed highlighting significant correlations between some GMP scores and children's overall performance in our sample. Finally, children in our sample appeared to experience specific difficulties with some GMPs, such as letter joins and alignment.

摘要

越来越多的小学生在涉及书写的书写运动技能方面遇到困难,这影响了他们文本的形式和内容。因此,通过标准化测试评估和监测小学阶段的书写技能,并检测影响书写清晰度的特定书写运动参数(GMPs)非常重要。有多种标准化工具可用于评估小学阶段的书写运动技能,但对于测试间的一致性、特定GMPs对儿童整体表现的影响以及哪些GMPs对于开始巩固书写技能的儿童可能特别难以解决,人们了解甚少。这些数据对于临床医生、治疗师和教育工作者极为重要,他们必须在不同的评估工具中进行选择,并设计量身定制的干预策略,以便在书写不佳的情况下在不同的GMPs上达到足够的表现。为了更好地了解当前可用的标准化工具,我们比较了39名有书写困难的意大利小学生(19名二年级学生和20名三年级学生)在三项用于书写运动技能评估的标准化测试中的整体表现,并探讨了各个GMPs对儿童表现的影响。结果显示,考虑到我们样本中的所有儿童,测试之间存在一些一致性,但二年级时不存在一致性,三年级时只有有限的一致性。数据还凸显了我们样本中一些GMP分数与儿童整体表现之间的显著相关性。最后,我们样本中的儿童在一些GMPs方面似乎遇到了特定困难,比如字母连接和对齐。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6eda/12052790/24757ab759b8/11145_2024_10562_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6eda/12052790/fb1ac4f85425/11145_2024_10562_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6eda/12052790/24757ab759b8/11145_2024_10562_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6eda/12052790/fb1ac4f85425/11145_2024_10562_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6eda/12052790/24757ab759b8/11145_2024_10562_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Handwriting in primary school: comparing standardized tests and evaluating impact of grapho-motor parameters.小学阶段的书写:比较标准化测试并评估书写运动参数的影响。
Read Writ. 2025;38(5):1409-1434. doi: 10.1007/s11145-024-10562-3. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
2
Evaluating Handwriting Skills through Human-Machine Interaction: A New Digitalized System for Parameters Extraction.通过人机交互评估书写技能:一种用于参数提取的新型数字化系统。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2022 Jul;2022:5128-5131. doi: 10.1109/EMBC48229.2022.9871538.
3
Fine motor deficiencies in children diagnosed as DCD based on poor grapho-motor ability.基于不良书写运动能力被诊断为发育协调障碍的儿童存在精细运动缺陷。
Hum Mov Sci. 2001 Mar;20(1-2):161-82. doi: 10.1016/s0167-9457(01)00033-1.
4
Handwriting in Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder: Is Legibility the Only Indicator of a Poor Performance?发展性协调障碍儿童的书写:难以辨认是否是表现不佳的唯一指标?
Occup Ther Health Care. 2022 Oct;36(4):353-367. doi: 10.1080/07380577.2021.1986873. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
5
Analyzing Occupational Performance of Children With Handwriting Difficulties: Parent and Teacher Experiences and Perspectives.分析有书写困难儿童的职业表现:家长和教师的经历与观点。
Occup Ther Int. 2025 Feb 26;2025:8882049. doi: 10.1155/oti/8882049. eCollection 2025.
6
Comparison of cursive handwriting instruction programs among students without identified problems.未发现问题的学生之间草书书写指导课程的比较。
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2009;29(2):170-81. doi: 10.1080/01942630902784738.
7
Motor functions of higher education students with dysgraphia.伴书写障碍的大学生的运动功能。
Res Dev Disabil. 2019 Nov;94:103479. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2019.103479. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
8
Test-retest reliability of the evaluation tool of children's handwriting-manuscript.儿童手写印刷体评估工具的重测信度
Am J Occup Ther. 1998 Apr;52(4):248-55. doi: 10.5014/ajot.52.4.248.
9
Practice schedule and testing per se affect children's transfer abilities in a grapho-motor task.练习时间安排和测试本身会影响儿童在图形运动任务中的迁移能力。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2022 Mar;215:105323. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105323. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
10
Validating the use of the evaluation tool of children's handwriting-manuscript to identify handwriting difficulties and detect change in school-age children.验证使用儿童手写体评估工具识别书写困难和检测学龄儿童变化的有效性。
Am J Occup Ther. 2012 Jul-Aug;66(4):414-21. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2012.003558.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploratory Investigation of Handwriting Disorders in School-Aged Children from First to Fifth Grade.一至五年级学龄儿童书写障碍的探索性调查
Children (Basel). 2023 Sep 6;10(9):1512. doi: 10.3390/children10091512.
2
Validation of the Concise Assessment Scale for Children's Handwriting (BHK) in an Italian Population.儿童笔迹简明评估量表(BHK)在意大利人群中的效度验证。
Children (Basel). 2023 Jan 27;10(2):223. doi: 10.3390/children10020223.
3
New Methods for Unraveling Imitation Accuracy Differences Between Children with Autism and Typically Developing Peers.
揭示自闭症儿童与普通发展同伴之间模仿准确性差异的新方法。
Percept Mot Skills. 2022 Dec;129(6):1749-1774. doi: 10.1177/00315125221126215. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
4
Evaluating Handwriting Skills through Human-Machine Interaction: A New Digitalized System for Parameters Extraction.通过人机交互评估书写技能:一种用于参数提取的新型数字化系统。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2022 Jul;2022:5128-5131. doi: 10.1109/EMBC48229.2022.9871538.
5
How Do Spelling, Handwriting Speed, and Handwriting Quality Develop During Primary School? Cross-Classified Growth Curve Analysis of Children's Writing Development.小学阶段拼写、书写速度和书写质量是如何发展的?儿童写作发展的交叉分类增长曲线分析。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 23;12:685681. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.685681. eCollection 2021.
6
Advantage of Handwriting Over Typing on Learning Words: Evidence From an N400 Event-Related Potential Index.手写在单词学习方面优于打字:来自N400事件相关电位指标的证据。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Jun 10;15:679191. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.679191. eCollection 2021.
7
Phenotyping features in the genesis of pre-scriptural gestures in children to assess handwriting developmental levels.在儿童前语言手势的起源中进行表型特征分析,以评估书写发育水平。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 12;11(1):731. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79315-w.
8
The Importance of Cursive Handwriting Over Typewriting for Learning in the Classroom: A High-Density EEG Study of 12-Year-Old Children and Young Adults.课堂学习中手写体相较于打字的重要性:一项针对12岁儿童和青年成人的高密度脑电图研究
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 28;11:1810. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01810. eCollection 2020.
9
Extending the Spectrum of Dysgraphia: A Data Driven Strategy to Estimate Handwriting Quality.扩展失写症谱系:一种基于数据驱动的估计书写质量的策略。
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 21;10(1):3140. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60011-8.
10
Differences in Brain Activity After Learning With the Use of a Digital Pen vs. an Ink Pen-An Electroencephalography Study.使用数字笔与墨水笔学习后大脑活动的差异——一项脑电图研究
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Aug 9;13:275. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00275. eCollection 2019.