Suppr超能文献

评估骑行过程中乳酸积累的最大速率和估计的最大乳酸稳态。

Evaluating the maximal rate of lactate accumulation and estimated maximal lactate steady state in cycling.

作者信息

Sablain Mattice, Sperlich Billy, Meixner Benedikt, Caen Kevin, Vermeire Kobe, Boone Jan

机构信息

Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Watersportlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.

Integrative & Experimental Exercise Science & Training, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Appl Physiol. 2025 May 8. doi: 10.1007/s00421-025-05751-z.

Abstract

This study examined the reliability of the maximal rate of blood lactate (BLa) accumulation (VLa) and the, thereof, derived calculated power output at maximal La steady state (cP-MLSS). Additionally, cP-MLSS was compared with the second La thresholds determined by experts (LT), being an accurate and often used threshold concept. 13 physically active male participants (length: 182 ± 4 cm; body mass: 76.3 ± 5.8 kg) completed a step incremental protocol to determine (60.5 ± 5.8 mL·min·kg) and LT. Additionally, a 15-s isokinetic sprint test was conducted on four separate occasions to determine VLa. cP-MLSS was calculated using a mathematical model based on VLa, and body mass. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and coefficients of variation (CV%) were used to assess reliability. A paired sample T test was used to compare cP-MLSS (mean value of the 4 test days) and LT. We found good reliability for VLa (ICC = 0.80) and excellent reliability for cP-MLSS (ICC = 0.99). Moreover, LT (277 ± 41 W) and cP-MLSS (282 ± 43 W) were not significantly different. However, comparison revealed relatively wide limits of agreement (-39 to 29 W). This study concludes that VLa and cP-MLSS are reliable measures but need further research and refinement to be used as valid parameters in training and performance contexts.

摘要

本研究考察了血乳酸(BLa)最大积累速率(VLa)及其在最大乳酸稳态(cP-MLSS)时推导计算的功率输出的可靠性。此外,将cP-MLSS与专家确定的第二个乳酸阈值(LT)进行了比较,LT是一个准确且常用的阈值概念。13名身体活跃的男性参与者(身高:182±4厘米;体重:76.3±5.8千克)完成了一项逐步递增方案以确定VLa(60.5±5.8毫升·分钟·千克)和LT。此外,在四个不同场合进行了15秒等速冲刺测试以确定VLa。cP-MLSS使用基于VLa、身高和体重的数学模型进行计算。组内相关系数(ICC)和变异系数(CV%)用于评估可靠性。采用配对样本T检验比较cP-MLSS(4个测试日的平均值)和LT。我们发现VLa具有良好的可靠性(ICC = 0.80),cP-MLSS具有出色的可靠性(ICC = 0.99)。此外,LT(277±41瓦)和cP-MLSS(282±43瓦)无显著差异。然而,比较显示一致性界限相对较宽(-39至29瓦)。本研究得出结论,VLa和cP-MLSS是可靠的测量指标,但在训练和表现情境中用作有效参数还需要进一步研究和完善。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验