Majeed Tazeen, Taylor Jo, Breuer Erica, Nepal Smriti, Remond Marc, Grant Luke, Hampton Stephen, Sullivan Elizabeth
School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
The Poche Centre for Indigenous Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health. The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
PLoS One. 2025 May 8;20(5):e0323118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323118. eCollection 2025.
The transition from custody to community is a critical juncture for people exiting custody, necessitating substantial support. However, the programs and services providing this support are often fragmented and lack a unified approach in terms of terminology, design, resourcing, timing, delivery, and monitoring and evaluation. This study sought to establish an agreed terminology and promote a broader consensus on best practices relating to these programs and services.
We used a two-phased Delphi methodology to provide a structured, formal, and iterative process for gathering and refining the opinions of subject experts, knowledge holders, and people with lived experiences. Using purposive sampling, 160 national and international participants were invited to participate. Comprehensive study protocol has already been published elsewhere.
This modified two-phased Delphi study delivers a set of 40 best-practice statements that can be adapted to the individual needs and contexts of different programs and services. These best-practice statements clarify several key themes, including language and terminology, program aims and outcomes, best-practice principles, the significance of an interconnected phased approach, timing related to services and programs, responsibility for funding and coordination of programs, and monitoring and evaluation. This study introduces an umbrella term, 'Transitional and Post-Release Support Programs (TPSP)', to describe programs and services for people exiting custody and provides best-practice statements that can enhance access, documentation, monitoring, and evaluation processes.
This study underscores the importance of a value-based approach in TPSPs to foster purposive program design and a human rights-aligned approach to service provision for people exiting custody. The use of umbrella term and the best-practice statements will promote the use of humane, dignified language, a streamlined, timely, structured, and collaborative discourse, and a more cohesive approach to service provision for people exiting custody.
从拘留场所过渡到社区,对于刑满释放人员而言是一个关键节点,需要大量支持。然而,提供此类支持的项目和服务往往零散,在术语、设计、资源配置、时机、交付以及监测和评估等方面缺乏统一方法。本研究旨在确立统一术语,并就这些项目和服务的最佳实践达成更广泛共识。
我们采用两阶段德尔菲法,提供一个结构化、正式且迭代的过程,以收集和完善主题专家、知识持有者以及有亲身经历者的意见。通过目的抽样,邀请了160名国内和国际参与者参与。全面的研究方案已在其他地方发表。
这项经过改进的两阶段德尔菲研究得出了一套40条最佳实践声明,可根据不同项目和服务的个体需求及背景进行调整。这些最佳实践声明阐明了几个关键主题,包括语言和术语、项目目标和成果、最佳实践原则、相互关联的分阶段方法的重要性、与服务和项目相关的时机、项目资金和协调的责任以及监测和评估。本研究引入了一个总括术语“过渡与释放后支持项目(TPSP)”,用于描述针对刑满释放人员的项目和服务,并提供了可加强获取、记录、监测和评估流程的最佳实践声明。
本研究强调了在过渡与释放后支持项目中采用基于价值观的方法以促进有目的的项目设计以及为刑满释放人员提供与人权相符的服务方法的重要性。总括术语和最佳实践声明的使用将促进使用人道、有尊严的语言,形成简化、及时、结构化且协作性的论述,并以更具凝聚力的方式为刑满释放人员提供服务。