• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏磁共振特征追踪技术进行节段应变分析对慢性心肌缺血性瘢痕评估的诊断准确性

Diagnostic accuracy of segmental strain analysis by cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking for chronic myocardial ischemic scar assessment.

作者信息

Mousa Mohammed, Mahmoud Islam, Elkammash Tarek, Gad Azza, Noureldin Radwa

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.

Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.

出版信息

Magn Reson Imaging. 2025 Sep;121:110408. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2025.110408. Epub 2025 May 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.mri.2025.110408
PMID:40339946
Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE

This study investigates the potential of segmental strain parameters derived from cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using feature tracking (FT) to detect chronic ischemic scars in patients with ischemic heart disease, offering an alternative to late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI, which has limitations such as long scan times and contraindications to gadolinium.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 47 patients with chronic coronary syndrome and 20 healthy controls were enrolled, with CMR examinations performed on a 1.5 Tesla MRI system. Strain parameters were analyzed from 1072 myocardial segments. Myocardial segments were categorized into four groups: healthy controls, remote myocardium (no late gadolinium enhancement), scarred-viable (<50 % scar transmurality), and nonviable (>50 % scar transmurality).

RESULTS

Results showed significant differences in segmental peak circumferential strain (SPCS), peak radial strain (SPRS), and peak longitudinal strain (SPLS) between scarred viable and nonviable segments compared to remote and control segments, with all p-values <0.001. Specifically, SPCS had a superior ability to distinguish scarred myocardium from remote tissue, showing an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.77, with a sensitivity of 71.5 % and specificity of 70 %. For differentiating nonviable from viable myocardium, SPCS achieved an AUC of 0.80, with a sensitivity of 82.02 % and specificity of 70.21 %.

CONCLUSION

CMR-FT strain analysis is promising complementary tool, particularly in situations where contrast administration is contraindicated or when a rapid, non-contrast assessment of myocardial viability and potential scar burden is desired.

摘要

原理与目的

本研究探讨了利用特征跟踪(FT)从电影磁共振成像(MRI)中获取的节段应变参数检测缺血性心脏病患者慢性缺血性瘢痕的潜力,为钆延迟增强(LGE)MRI提供了一种替代方法,后者存在扫描时间长和钆剂禁忌等局限性。

患者与方法

共纳入47例慢性冠状动脉综合征患者和20例健康对照者,在1.5特斯拉MRI系统上进行心脏磁共振成像(CMR)检查。对1072个心肌节段的应变参数进行分析。心肌节段分为四组:健康对照、远隔心肌(无钆延迟增强)、瘢痕存活心肌(瘢痕透壁率<50%)和无存活心肌(瘢痕透壁率>50%)。

结果

结果显示,与远隔心肌和对照节段相比,瘢痕存活心肌节段与无存活心肌节段之间的节段峰值圆周应变(SPCS)、峰值径向应变(SPRS)和峰值纵向应变(SPLS)存在显著差异,所有p值均<0.001。具体而言,SPCS区分瘢痕心肌与远隔组织的能力更强,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.77,敏感性为71.5%,特异性为70%。对于区分无存活心肌与存活心肌,SPCS的AUC为0.80,敏感性为82.02%,特异性为70.21%。

结论

CMR-FT应变分析是一种很有前景的辅助工具,特别是在有钆剂使用禁忌的情况下,或者需要对心肌存活能力和潜在瘢痕负荷进行快速、无对比剂评估的情况下。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy of segmental strain analysis by cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking for chronic myocardial ischemic scar assessment.心脏磁共振特征追踪技术进行节段应变分析对慢性心肌缺血性瘢痕评估的诊断准确性
Magn Reson Imaging. 2025 Sep;121:110408. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2025.110408. Epub 2025 May 6.
2
Segmental strain analysis for the detection of chronic ischemic scars in non-contrast cardiac MRI cine images.节段应变分析在非对比心脏 MRI 电影图像中检测慢性缺血性瘢痕。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 11;11(1):12376. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90283-7.
3
Strain analysis using feature tracking cardiac magnetic resonance (FT-CMR) in the assessment of myocardial viability in chronic ischemic patients.采用特征跟踪心脏磁共振(FT-CMR)进行应变分析评估慢性缺血患者的心肌存活性。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Feb;37(2):587-596. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-02018-w. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
4
Segmental strain for scar detection in acute myocardial infarcts and in follow-up exams using non-contrast CMR cine sequences.利用非对比增强 CMR 电影序列检测急性心肌梗死及随访检查中的瘢痕节段应变。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 May 18;22(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02664-z.
5
Speckle-Tracking Layer-Specific Analysis of Myocardial Deformation and Evaluation of Scar Transmurality in Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease.斑点追踪分层心肌应变分析及评价慢性缺血性心脏病瘢痕透壁程度。
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017 Jul;30(7):667-675. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2017.03.015. Epub 2017 May 13.
6
Regional myocardial strain by cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking for detection of scar in ischemic heart disease.心脏磁共振特征追踪技术检测缺血性心脏病瘢痕的区域性心肌应变。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 May;68:190-196. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2020.02.009. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
7
Clinical value of dark-blood late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance without additional magnetization preparation.无额外磁化准备的黑血晚期钆增强心血管磁共振的临床价值。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2019 Jul 29;21(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12968-019-0556-1.
8
Clinical experience of strain imaging using DENSE for detecting infarcted cardiac segments.使用DENSE应变成像检测梗死心肌节段的临床经验。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015 Jun 24;17(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12968-015-0155-8.
9
Native T1 mapping to detect extent of acute and chronic myocardial infarction: comparison with late gadolinium enhancement technique.利用天然T1映射检测急性和慢性心肌梗死范围:与延迟钆增强技术的比较
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Mar;35(3):517-527. doi: 10.1007/s10554-018-1467-1. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
10
Layer-specific analysis of myocardial deformation for assessment of infarct transmurality: comparison of strain-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance with 2D speckle tracking echocardiography.心肌变形的分层分析评估梗死透壁程度:应变编码心血管磁共振与二维斑点追踪超声心动图的比较。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Jun;14(6):570-8. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jes229. Epub 2012 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Hybrid biomaterials-based radiosensitizers: Preparations and their applications in enhancing tumor radiotherapy.基于混合生物材料的放射增敏剂:制备方法及其在增强肿瘤放射治疗中的应用。
Mater Today Bio. 2025 Aug 9;34:102186. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.102186. eCollection 2025 Oct.