Grillo Elizabeth U
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, West Chester University of Pennsylvania, West Chester, PA.
J Voice. 2025 May 7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.04.005.
The Global Voice Prevention and Therapy Model (GVPTM) with the Estill Voice Model (EVM) involves four concepts: 1) training multiple new voice targets to meet all the vocal demands of the client, 2) using an integrated implicit-explicit instructional approach, 3) switching between voice targets, and 4) facilitating voice practice in a bottom-up speech hierarchy. As a preliminary investigation into the four concepts, the current study compared the GVPTM with EVM to a modified version of the GVPTM (MGVPTM) with EVM that eliminated concepts 1 (only one new resonant voice was trained) and 3 (no switching between voice targets) and kept concepts 2 and 4.
Four professional teachers were randomized into one of two conditions in a single-subject design counterbalanced with alternating treatments and baselines (ie, ABACA or ACABA). In condition 1 (ABACA), the GVPTM was first followed by MGVPTM. In condition 2 (ACABA), the MGVPTM was first followed by the GVPTM. Baseline measures included fundamental frequency (f), participant self-ratings of overall voice quality, roughness, and strain, the Voice Handicap Index (VHI)-10, Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI), survey questions, and answers to questions via an exit interview.
The results indicated significant differences for f and self-ratings of overall vocal quality, roughness, and strain from pre to post for the GVPTM and MGVPTM. VHI-10 and VFI factors 1, 2, and 3 yielded no differences from pre to post. Overall, the participants viewed all four concepts in the GVPTM favorably and suggested it was limiting to learn only one new resonant voice with no switching between voice targets in the MGVPTM.
Speech-language pathologists may consider using all four concepts in voice therapy sessions represented via targets, ingredients, and mechanisms of action of the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System.
全球嗓音预防与治疗模型(GVPTM)与埃斯蒂尔嗓音模型(EVM)涉及四个概念:1)训练多个新的嗓音目标以满足客户所有的发声需求;2)采用综合的内隐-外显教学方法;3)在嗓音目标之间进行切换;4)在自下而上的言语层次结构中促进嗓音练习。作为对这四个概念的初步调查,本研究将GVPTM与EVM和经过修改的GVPTM(MGVPTM)与EVM进行了比较,后者消除了概念1(仅训练一种新的共鸣嗓音)和概念3(不在嗓音目标之间进行切换),保留了概念2和4。
在一项单被试设计中,四名专业教师被随机分配到两种条件之一,采用交替治疗和基线的平衡设计(即ABACA或ACABA)。在条件1(ABACA)中,先采用GVPTM,后采用MGVPTM。在条件2(ACABA)中,先采用MGVPTM,后采用GVPTM。基线测量包括基频(f)、参与者对整体嗓音质量、粗糙度和紧张度的自我评分、嗓音障碍指数(VHI)-10、嗓音疲劳指数(VFI)、调查问卷问题以及通过退出访谈获得的问题答案。
结果表明,GVPTM和MGVPTM在从治疗前到治疗后的f以及整体嗓音质量、粗糙度和紧张度的自我评分方面存在显著差异。VHI-10以及VFI的因素1、2和3在治疗前到治疗后没有差异。总体而言,参与者对GVPTM中的所有四个概念评价良好,并认为在MGVPTM中只学习一种新的共鸣嗓音且不在嗓音目标之间进行切换具有局限性。
言语语言病理学家在嗓音治疗课程中可考虑通过康复治疗规范系统的目标、要素和作用机制来运用所有这四个概念。