Endara-Mina Jesús, Escudero Cristopher-Josue, Carreño Kerly, Intriago Cesar, López-Carrera Rafael
Ecuavolcan Research Group, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito, ECU.
Research, Hospital de Especialidades Eugenio Espejo, Quito, ECU.
Cureus. 2025 Apr 8;17(4):e81908. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81908. eCollection 2025 Apr.
Carotid stenosis (CS) is closely associated with cognitive decline, primarily affecting memory, attention, and executive function. This relationship is explained by mechanisms such as chronic cerebral hypoperfusion and asymptomatic microembolism. Interventions like carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) have demonstrated potential benefits in restoring cerebral perfusion; however, outcomes are variable, particularly in domains such as executive function. These differences may be attributed to patient characteristics, the degree of stenosis, and the technique employed. Revascularization is more commonly associated with the stabilization of cognitive decline rather than the active improvement of cognitive function. CEA has shown superiority over CAS in promoting recovery of cerebral connectivity and hemodynamic stability. Improvements have been documented using instruments such as the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), especially in patients with baseline cognitive impairment. Complications such as postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) and hyperperfusion syndrome underscore the importance of appropriate patient selection, taking into account factors such as advanced age, hypertension, and bilateral stenosis. Biomarkers such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios are associated with a higher risk of postoperative cognitive deterioration. Imaging modalities, including functional magnetic resonance imaging, support evidence of functional recovery following CEA. Questions remain regarding the long-term benefits, optimal selection criteria, and predictive value of biomarkers, all of which represent key areas for future research.
颈动脉狭窄(CS)与认知功能下降密切相关,主要影响记忆、注意力和执行功能。这种关系可通过慢性脑灌注不足和无症状微栓塞等机制来解释。颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)和颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)等干预措施已显示出在恢复脑灌注方面的潜在益处;然而,结果存在差异,尤其是在执行功能等领域。这些差异可能归因于患者特征、狭窄程度和所采用的技术。血运重建更常与认知功能下降的稳定相关,而非认知功能的积极改善。在促进脑连接恢复和血流动力学稳定方面,CEA已显示出优于CAS。使用蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)等工具已记录到改善情况,尤其是在基线认知障碍患者中。术后认知功能障碍(POCD)和高灌注综合征等并发症凸显了考虑高龄、高血压和双侧狭窄等因素进行适当患者选择的重要性。中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值和血小板与淋巴细胞比值等生物标志物与术后认知恶化的较高风险相关。包括功能磁共振成像在内的影像学检查方法为CEA术后功能恢复提供了证据支持。关于长期益处、最佳选择标准和生物标志物的预测价值等问题仍然存在,所有这些都是未来研究的关键领域。